Cargando…

Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization

Locating a tactile stimulus on the body seems effortless and straightforward. However, the perceived location of a tactile stimulation can differ from its physical location [1, 2, 3]. Tactile mislocalizations can depend on the timing of successive stimulations [2, 4, 5], tactile motion mechanisms [6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dupin, Lucile, Haggard, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032
_version_ 1783394464279035904
author Dupin, Lucile
Haggard, Patrick
author_facet Dupin, Lucile
Haggard, Patrick
author_sort Dupin, Lucile
collection PubMed
description Locating a tactile stimulus on the body seems effortless and straightforward. However, the perceived location of a tactile stimulation can differ from its physical location [1, 2, 3]. Tactile mislocalizations can depend on the timing of successive stimulations [2, 4, 5], tactile motion mechanisms [6], or processes that “remap” stimuli from skin locations to external space coordinates [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. We report six experiments demonstrating that the perception of tactile localization on a static body part is strongly affected by the displacement between the locations of two successive task-irrelevant actions. Participants moved their index finger between two keys. Each keypress triggered synchronous tactile stimulation at a randomized location on the immobilized wrist or forehead. Participants reported the location of the second tactile stimulation relative to the first. The direction of either active finger movements or passive finger displacements biased participants’ tactile orientation judgements (experiment 1). The effect generalized to tactile stimuli delivered to other body sites (experiment 2). Two successive keypresses, by different fingers at distinct locations, reproduced the effect (experiment 3). The effect remained even when the hand that moved was placed far from the tactile stimulation site (experiments 4 and 5). Temporal synchrony within 600 ms between the movement and tactile stimulations was necessary for the effect (experiment 6). Our results indicate that a dynamic displacement vector, defined as the location of one sensorimotor event relative to the one before, plays a strong role in structuring tactile spatial perception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6370943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63709432019-02-21 Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization Dupin, Lucile Haggard, Patrick Curr Biol Article Locating a tactile stimulus on the body seems effortless and straightforward. However, the perceived location of a tactile stimulation can differ from its physical location [1, 2, 3]. Tactile mislocalizations can depend on the timing of successive stimulations [2, 4, 5], tactile motion mechanisms [6], or processes that “remap” stimuli from skin locations to external space coordinates [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. We report six experiments demonstrating that the perception of tactile localization on a static body part is strongly affected by the displacement between the locations of two successive task-irrelevant actions. Participants moved their index finger between two keys. Each keypress triggered synchronous tactile stimulation at a randomized location on the immobilized wrist or forehead. Participants reported the location of the second tactile stimulation relative to the first. The direction of either active finger movements or passive finger displacements biased participants’ tactile orientation judgements (experiment 1). The effect generalized to tactile stimuli delivered to other body sites (experiment 2). Two successive keypresses, by different fingers at distinct locations, reproduced the effect (experiment 3). The effect remained even when the hand that moved was placed far from the tactile stimulation site (experiments 4 and 5). Temporal synchrony within 600 ms between the movement and tactile stimulations was necessary for the effect (experiment 6). Our results indicate that a dynamic displacement vector, defined as the location of one sensorimotor event relative to the one before, plays a strong role in structuring tactile spatial perception. Cell Press 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6370943/ /pubmed/30686734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dupin, Lucile
Haggard, Patrick
Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization
title Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization
title_full Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization
title_fullStr Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization
title_short Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization
title_sort dynamic displacement vector interacts with tactile localization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032
work_keys_str_mv AT dupinlucile dynamicdisplacementvectorinteractswithtactilelocalization
AT haggardpatrick dynamicdisplacementvectorinteractswithtactilelocalization