Cargando…
Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization
Locating a tactile stimulus on the body seems effortless and straightforward. However, the perceived location of a tactile stimulation can differ from its physical location [1, 2, 3]. Tactile mislocalizations can depend on the timing of successive stimulations [2, 4, 5], tactile motion mechanisms [6...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cell Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032 |
_version_ | 1783394464279035904 |
---|---|
author | Dupin, Lucile Haggard, Patrick |
author_facet | Dupin, Lucile Haggard, Patrick |
author_sort | Dupin, Lucile |
collection | PubMed |
description | Locating a tactile stimulus on the body seems effortless and straightforward. However, the perceived location of a tactile stimulation can differ from its physical location [1, 2, 3]. Tactile mislocalizations can depend on the timing of successive stimulations [2, 4, 5], tactile motion mechanisms [6], or processes that “remap” stimuli from skin locations to external space coordinates [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. We report six experiments demonstrating that the perception of tactile localization on a static body part is strongly affected by the displacement between the locations of two successive task-irrelevant actions. Participants moved their index finger between two keys. Each keypress triggered synchronous tactile stimulation at a randomized location on the immobilized wrist or forehead. Participants reported the location of the second tactile stimulation relative to the first. The direction of either active finger movements or passive finger displacements biased participants’ tactile orientation judgements (experiment 1). The effect generalized to tactile stimuli delivered to other body sites (experiment 2). Two successive keypresses, by different fingers at distinct locations, reproduced the effect (experiment 3). The effect remained even when the hand that moved was placed far from the tactile stimulation site (experiments 4 and 5). Temporal synchrony within 600 ms between the movement and tactile stimulations was necessary for the effect (experiment 6). Our results indicate that a dynamic displacement vector, defined as the location of one sensorimotor event relative to the one before, plays a strong role in structuring tactile spatial perception. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6370943 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cell Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63709432019-02-21 Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization Dupin, Lucile Haggard, Patrick Curr Biol Article Locating a tactile stimulus on the body seems effortless and straightforward. However, the perceived location of a tactile stimulation can differ from its physical location [1, 2, 3]. Tactile mislocalizations can depend on the timing of successive stimulations [2, 4, 5], tactile motion mechanisms [6], or processes that “remap” stimuli from skin locations to external space coordinates [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. We report six experiments demonstrating that the perception of tactile localization on a static body part is strongly affected by the displacement between the locations of two successive task-irrelevant actions. Participants moved their index finger between two keys. Each keypress triggered synchronous tactile stimulation at a randomized location on the immobilized wrist or forehead. Participants reported the location of the second tactile stimulation relative to the first. The direction of either active finger movements or passive finger displacements biased participants’ tactile orientation judgements (experiment 1). The effect generalized to tactile stimuli delivered to other body sites (experiment 2). Two successive keypresses, by different fingers at distinct locations, reproduced the effect (experiment 3). The effect remained even when the hand that moved was placed far from the tactile stimulation site (experiments 4 and 5). Temporal synchrony within 600 ms between the movement and tactile stimulations was necessary for the effect (experiment 6). Our results indicate that a dynamic displacement vector, defined as the location of one sensorimotor event relative to the one before, plays a strong role in structuring tactile spatial perception. Cell Press 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6370943/ /pubmed/30686734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dupin, Lucile Haggard, Patrick Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization |
title | Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization |
title_full | Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization |
title_fullStr | Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization |
title_short | Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization |
title_sort | dynamic displacement vector interacts with tactile localization |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dupinlucile dynamicdisplacementvectorinteractswithtactilelocalization AT haggardpatrick dynamicdisplacementvectorinteractswithtactilelocalization |