Cargando…

Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) using TwinBeam CT (TBCT) is a new option for radiation oncology simulators. TBCT scanning provides virtual monoenergetic images which are attractive in treatment planning since lower energies offer better contrast for soft tissues, and higher energies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Tonghe, Ghavidel, Beth Bradshaw, Beitler, Jonathan J., Tang, Xiangyang, Lei, Yang, Curran, Walter J., Liu, Tian, Yang, Xiaofeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12539
_version_ 1783394471669399552
author Wang, Tonghe
Ghavidel, Beth Bradshaw
Beitler, Jonathan J.
Tang, Xiangyang
Lei, Yang
Curran, Walter J.
Liu, Tian
Yang, Xiaofeng
author_facet Wang, Tonghe
Ghavidel, Beth Bradshaw
Beitler, Jonathan J.
Tang, Xiangyang
Lei, Yang
Curran, Walter J.
Liu, Tian
Yang, Xiaofeng
author_sort Wang, Tonghe
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) using TwinBeam CT (TBCT) is a new option for radiation oncology simulators. TBCT scanning provides virtual monoenergetic images which are attractive in treatment planning since lower energies offer better contrast for soft tissues, and higher energies reduce noise. A protocol is needed to achieve optimal performance of this feature. In this study, we investigated the TBCT scan schema with the head‐and‐neck radiotherapy workflow at our clinic and selected the optimal energy with best contrast‐noise‐ratio (CNR) in organs‐at‐risks (OARs) delineation for head‐and‐neck treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We synthesized monochromatic images from 40 keV to 190 keV at 5 keV increments from data acquired by TBCT. We collected the Hounsfield unit (HU) numbers of OARs (brainstem, mandible, spinal cord, and parotid glands), the HU numbers of marginal regions outside OARs, and the noise levels for each monochromatic image. We then calculated the CNR for the different OARs at each energy level to generate a serial of spectral curves for each OAR. Based on these spectral curves of CNR, the mono‐energy corresponding to the max CNR was identified for each OAR of each patient. RESULTS: Computed tomography scans of ten patients by TBCT were used to test the optimal monoenergetic image for the CNR of OAR. Based on the maximized CNR, the optimal energy values were 78.5 ± 5.3 keV for the brainstem, 78.0 ± 4.2 keV for the mandible, 78.5 ± 5.7 keV for the parotid glands, and 78.5 ± 5.3 keV for the spinal cord. Overall, the optimal energy for the maximum CNR of these OARs in head‐and‐neck cancer patients was 80 keV. CONCLUSION: We have proposed a clinically feasible protocol that selects the optimal energy level of the virtual monoenergetic image in TBCT for OAR delineation based on the CNR in head‐and‐neck OAR. This protocol can be applied in TBCT simulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6370994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63709942019-02-21 Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy Wang, Tonghe Ghavidel, Beth Bradshaw Beitler, Jonathan J. Tang, Xiangyang Lei, Yang Curran, Walter J. Liu, Tian Yang, Xiaofeng J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) using TwinBeam CT (TBCT) is a new option for radiation oncology simulators. TBCT scanning provides virtual monoenergetic images which are attractive in treatment planning since lower energies offer better contrast for soft tissues, and higher energies reduce noise. A protocol is needed to achieve optimal performance of this feature. In this study, we investigated the TBCT scan schema with the head‐and‐neck radiotherapy workflow at our clinic and selected the optimal energy with best contrast‐noise‐ratio (CNR) in organs‐at‐risks (OARs) delineation for head‐and‐neck treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We synthesized monochromatic images from 40 keV to 190 keV at 5 keV increments from data acquired by TBCT. We collected the Hounsfield unit (HU) numbers of OARs (brainstem, mandible, spinal cord, and parotid glands), the HU numbers of marginal regions outside OARs, and the noise levels for each monochromatic image. We then calculated the CNR for the different OARs at each energy level to generate a serial of spectral curves for each OAR. Based on these spectral curves of CNR, the mono‐energy corresponding to the max CNR was identified for each OAR of each patient. RESULTS: Computed tomography scans of ten patients by TBCT were used to test the optimal monoenergetic image for the CNR of OAR. Based on the maximized CNR, the optimal energy values were 78.5 ± 5.3 keV for the brainstem, 78.0 ± 4.2 keV for the mandible, 78.5 ± 5.7 keV for the parotid glands, and 78.5 ± 5.3 keV for the spinal cord. Overall, the optimal energy for the maximum CNR of these OARs in head‐and‐neck cancer patients was 80 keV. CONCLUSION: We have proposed a clinically feasible protocol that selects the optimal energy level of the virtual monoenergetic image in TBCT for OAR delineation based on the CNR in head‐and‐neck OAR. This protocol can be applied in TBCT simulation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6370994/ /pubmed/30693665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12539 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Wang, Tonghe
Ghavidel, Beth Bradshaw
Beitler, Jonathan J.
Tang, Xiangyang
Lei, Yang
Curran, Walter J.
Liu, Tian
Yang, Xiaofeng
Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy
title Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy
title_full Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy
title_fullStr Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy
title_short Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy
title_sort optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “twinbeam” dual‐energy ct for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12539
work_keys_str_mv AT wangtonghe optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT ghavidelbethbradshaw optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT beitlerjonathanj optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT tangxiangyang optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT leiyang optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT curranwalterj optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT liutian optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT yangxiaofeng optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy