Cargando…
Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy
PURPOSE: Dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) using TwinBeam CT (TBCT) is a new option for radiation oncology simulators. TBCT scanning provides virtual monoenergetic images which are attractive in treatment planning since lower energies offer better contrast for soft tissues, and higher energies...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12539 |
_version_ | 1783394471669399552 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Tonghe Ghavidel, Beth Bradshaw Beitler, Jonathan J. Tang, Xiangyang Lei, Yang Curran, Walter J. Liu, Tian Yang, Xiaofeng |
author_facet | Wang, Tonghe Ghavidel, Beth Bradshaw Beitler, Jonathan J. Tang, Xiangyang Lei, Yang Curran, Walter J. Liu, Tian Yang, Xiaofeng |
author_sort | Wang, Tonghe |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) using TwinBeam CT (TBCT) is a new option for radiation oncology simulators. TBCT scanning provides virtual monoenergetic images which are attractive in treatment planning since lower energies offer better contrast for soft tissues, and higher energies reduce noise. A protocol is needed to achieve optimal performance of this feature. In this study, we investigated the TBCT scan schema with the head‐and‐neck radiotherapy workflow at our clinic and selected the optimal energy with best contrast‐noise‐ratio (CNR) in organs‐at‐risks (OARs) delineation for head‐and‐neck treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We synthesized monochromatic images from 40 keV to 190 keV at 5 keV increments from data acquired by TBCT. We collected the Hounsfield unit (HU) numbers of OARs (brainstem, mandible, spinal cord, and parotid glands), the HU numbers of marginal regions outside OARs, and the noise levels for each monochromatic image. We then calculated the CNR for the different OARs at each energy level to generate a serial of spectral curves for each OAR. Based on these spectral curves of CNR, the mono‐energy corresponding to the max CNR was identified for each OAR of each patient. RESULTS: Computed tomography scans of ten patients by TBCT were used to test the optimal monoenergetic image for the CNR of OAR. Based on the maximized CNR, the optimal energy values were 78.5 ± 5.3 keV for the brainstem, 78.0 ± 4.2 keV for the mandible, 78.5 ± 5.7 keV for the parotid glands, and 78.5 ± 5.3 keV for the spinal cord. Overall, the optimal energy for the maximum CNR of these OARs in head‐and‐neck cancer patients was 80 keV. CONCLUSION: We have proposed a clinically feasible protocol that selects the optimal energy level of the virtual monoenergetic image in TBCT for OAR delineation based on the CNR in head‐and‐neck OAR. This protocol can be applied in TBCT simulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6370994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63709942019-02-21 Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy Wang, Tonghe Ghavidel, Beth Bradshaw Beitler, Jonathan J. Tang, Xiangyang Lei, Yang Curran, Walter J. Liu, Tian Yang, Xiaofeng J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) using TwinBeam CT (TBCT) is a new option for radiation oncology simulators. TBCT scanning provides virtual monoenergetic images which are attractive in treatment planning since lower energies offer better contrast for soft tissues, and higher energies reduce noise. A protocol is needed to achieve optimal performance of this feature. In this study, we investigated the TBCT scan schema with the head‐and‐neck radiotherapy workflow at our clinic and selected the optimal energy with best contrast‐noise‐ratio (CNR) in organs‐at‐risks (OARs) delineation for head‐and‐neck treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We synthesized monochromatic images from 40 keV to 190 keV at 5 keV increments from data acquired by TBCT. We collected the Hounsfield unit (HU) numbers of OARs (brainstem, mandible, spinal cord, and parotid glands), the HU numbers of marginal regions outside OARs, and the noise levels for each monochromatic image. We then calculated the CNR for the different OARs at each energy level to generate a serial of spectral curves for each OAR. Based on these spectral curves of CNR, the mono‐energy corresponding to the max CNR was identified for each OAR of each patient. RESULTS: Computed tomography scans of ten patients by TBCT were used to test the optimal monoenergetic image for the CNR of OAR. Based on the maximized CNR, the optimal energy values were 78.5 ± 5.3 keV for the brainstem, 78.0 ± 4.2 keV for the mandible, 78.5 ± 5.7 keV for the parotid glands, and 78.5 ± 5.3 keV for the spinal cord. Overall, the optimal energy for the maximum CNR of these OARs in head‐and‐neck cancer patients was 80 keV. CONCLUSION: We have proposed a clinically feasible protocol that selects the optimal energy level of the virtual monoenergetic image in TBCT for OAR delineation based on the CNR in head‐and‐neck OAR. This protocol can be applied in TBCT simulation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6370994/ /pubmed/30693665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12539 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Wang, Tonghe Ghavidel, Beth Bradshaw Beitler, Jonathan J. Tang, Xiangyang Lei, Yang Curran, Walter J. Liu, Tian Yang, Xiaofeng Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy |
title | Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy |
title_full | Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy |
title_short | Optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “TwinBeam” dual‐energy CT for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy |
title_sort | optimal virtual monoenergetic image in “twinbeam” dual‐energy ct for organs‐at‐risk delineation based on contrast‐noise‐ratio in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12539 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangtonghe optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy AT ghavidelbethbradshaw optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy AT beitlerjonathanj optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy AT tangxiangyang optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy AT leiyang optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy AT curranwalterj optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy AT liutian optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy AT yangxiaofeng optimalvirtualmonoenergeticimageintwinbeamdualenergyctfororgansatriskdelineationbasedoncontrastnoiseratioinheadandneckradiotherapy |