Cargando…

Three Therapeutic Strategies: Cinacalcet, Paricalcitol or Both in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment in Hemodialysed Patients During 1-Year Observational Study—A Comparison

Introduction: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) is a common hormonal complication of chronic kidney disease. There are several therapeutic options for sHPT management aiming at calcium-phosphorus balance normalization and decrease of parathormone secretion. Objectives: The aim of this retrospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zawierucha, Jacek, Malyszko, Jolanta, Malyszko, Jacek S., Prystacki, Tomasz, Marcinkowski, Wojciech P., Dryl-Rydzynska, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00040
_version_ 1783394481778720768
author Zawierucha, Jacek
Malyszko, Jolanta
Malyszko, Jacek S.
Prystacki, Tomasz
Marcinkowski, Wojciech P.
Dryl-Rydzynska, Teresa
author_facet Zawierucha, Jacek
Malyszko, Jolanta
Malyszko, Jacek S.
Prystacki, Tomasz
Marcinkowski, Wojciech P.
Dryl-Rydzynska, Teresa
author_sort Zawierucha, Jacek
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) is a common hormonal complication of chronic kidney disease. There are several therapeutic options for sHPT management aiming at calcium-phosphorus balance normalization and decrease of parathormone secretion. Objectives: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was the outcome assessement of three most common therapeutic strategies of secondary hyperparathyroidism treatment with vitamin D receptor activator-paricalcitol, calcimimetic-cinacalcet or both agents administered together during in 12-months period. Methods: One hundred and thirty-one haemodialysed patients with uncontrolled parathyroid hormone secretion have been treated with paricalcitol administered intravenously (group PAR−60 patients) or cinacalcet per os (group CIN−50 patients). The last group (group PAR+CIN−21 patients) received paricalcitol i.v. and oral cinacalcet administered simultaneously. Results: In all groups, the iPTH level decreased significantly, however in group 1 treated with paricalcitol administered intravenously iPTH level decrease was greater than in group 2 treated with cinacalcet and in group 3 treated with paricalcitol and cinacalcet in parallel. The most substantial change of iPTH level was noticed after 3-months of observation. After this period the iPTH level was stabilized and maintained till the end of observation. Safety level of all strategies was comparable. No severe hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia was observed during the whole period of observation. Conclusions: The results of observation show significant advantage of intravenous paricalcitol treatment. Complementing cinacalcet therapy with paricalcitol does not improve treatment outcomes. In case of unsatisfactory results after 3-months treatment, potential continuation should be considered carefully. Among three available therapeutic options, the treatment with paricalcitol i.v. should be considered in all haemodialysed patients with inadequate control of serum PTH level. The second option—with cinacalced administered orally should be considered in PD patients and when severe hypercalcemia occurs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6371033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63710332019-02-25 Three Therapeutic Strategies: Cinacalcet, Paricalcitol or Both in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment in Hemodialysed Patients During 1-Year Observational Study—A Comparison Zawierucha, Jacek Malyszko, Jolanta Malyszko, Jacek S. Prystacki, Tomasz Marcinkowski, Wojciech P. Dryl-Rydzynska, Teresa Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Introduction: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) is a common hormonal complication of chronic kidney disease. There are several therapeutic options for sHPT management aiming at calcium-phosphorus balance normalization and decrease of parathormone secretion. Objectives: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was the outcome assessement of three most common therapeutic strategies of secondary hyperparathyroidism treatment with vitamin D receptor activator-paricalcitol, calcimimetic-cinacalcet or both agents administered together during in 12-months period. Methods: One hundred and thirty-one haemodialysed patients with uncontrolled parathyroid hormone secretion have been treated with paricalcitol administered intravenously (group PAR−60 patients) or cinacalcet per os (group CIN−50 patients). The last group (group PAR+CIN−21 patients) received paricalcitol i.v. and oral cinacalcet administered simultaneously. Results: In all groups, the iPTH level decreased significantly, however in group 1 treated with paricalcitol administered intravenously iPTH level decrease was greater than in group 2 treated with cinacalcet and in group 3 treated with paricalcitol and cinacalcet in parallel. The most substantial change of iPTH level was noticed after 3-months of observation. After this period the iPTH level was stabilized and maintained till the end of observation. Safety level of all strategies was comparable. No severe hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia was observed during the whole period of observation. Conclusions: The results of observation show significant advantage of intravenous paricalcitol treatment. Complementing cinacalcet therapy with paricalcitol does not improve treatment outcomes. In case of unsatisfactory results after 3-months treatment, potential continuation should be considered carefully. Among three available therapeutic options, the treatment with paricalcitol i.v. should be considered in all haemodialysed patients with inadequate control of serum PTH level. The second option—with cinacalced administered orally should be considered in PD patients and when severe hypercalcemia occurs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6371033/ /pubmed/30804890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00040 Text en Copyright © 2019 Zawierucha, Malyszko, Malyszko, Prystacki, Marcinkowski and Dryl-Rydzynska. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Zawierucha, Jacek
Malyszko, Jolanta
Malyszko, Jacek S.
Prystacki, Tomasz
Marcinkowski, Wojciech P.
Dryl-Rydzynska, Teresa
Three Therapeutic Strategies: Cinacalcet, Paricalcitol or Both in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment in Hemodialysed Patients During 1-Year Observational Study—A Comparison
title Three Therapeutic Strategies: Cinacalcet, Paricalcitol or Both in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment in Hemodialysed Patients During 1-Year Observational Study—A Comparison
title_full Three Therapeutic Strategies: Cinacalcet, Paricalcitol or Both in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment in Hemodialysed Patients During 1-Year Observational Study—A Comparison
title_fullStr Three Therapeutic Strategies: Cinacalcet, Paricalcitol or Both in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment in Hemodialysed Patients During 1-Year Observational Study—A Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Three Therapeutic Strategies: Cinacalcet, Paricalcitol or Both in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment in Hemodialysed Patients During 1-Year Observational Study—A Comparison
title_short Three Therapeutic Strategies: Cinacalcet, Paricalcitol or Both in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment in Hemodialysed Patients During 1-Year Observational Study—A Comparison
title_sort three therapeutic strategies: cinacalcet, paricalcitol or both in secondary hyperparathyroidism treatment in hemodialysed patients during 1-year observational study—a comparison
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00040
work_keys_str_mv AT zawieruchajacek threetherapeuticstrategiescinacalcetparicalcitolorbothinsecondaryhyperparathyroidismtreatmentinhemodialysedpatientsduring1yearobservationalstudyacomparison
AT malyszkojolanta threetherapeuticstrategiescinacalcetparicalcitolorbothinsecondaryhyperparathyroidismtreatmentinhemodialysedpatientsduring1yearobservationalstudyacomparison
AT malyszkojaceks threetherapeuticstrategiescinacalcetparicalcitolorbothinsecondaryhyperparathyroidismtreatmentinhemodialysedpatientsduring1yearobservationalstudyacomparison
AT prystackitomasz threetherapeuticstrategiescinacalcetparicalcitolorbothinsecondaryhyperparathyroidismtreatmentinhemodialysedpatientsduring1yearobservationalstudyacomparison
AT marcinkowskiwojciechp threetherapeuticstrategiescinacalcetparicalcitolorbothinsecondaryhyperparathyroidismtreatmentinhemodialysedpatientsduring1yearobservationalstudyacomparison
AT drylrydzynskateresa threetherapeuticstrategiescinacalcetparicalcitolorbothinsecondaryhyperparathyroidismtreatmentinhemodialysedpatientsduring1yearobservationalstudyacomparison