Cargando…

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement

BACKGROUND: Several hundred core outcome set (COS) projects have been systematically identified to date which, if adopted, ensure that researchers measure and report those outcomes that are most likely to be relevant to users of their research. The uptake of a COS by COS users will depend in part on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kirkham, Jamie J., Gorst, Sarah, Altman, Douglas G., Blazeby, Jane M., Clarke, Mike, Tunis, Sean, Williamson, Paula R.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2019
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3230-x

Ejemplares similares

Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The core outcome measures in effectiveness trials (COMET) initiative: five years on
por: Williamson, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

COMET V meeting summary
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
por: Davis, Katherine, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
por: Wuytack, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Citation analysis: a new approach to assess the uptake of core outcome sets
por: Barnes, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Standardising the reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: protocol for the development of a core outcome set and accompanying outcome measurement instrument set (the GASTROS study)
por: Alkhaffaf, Bilal, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Has the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core outcome set influenced the selection of study outcome measures?
por: Kirkham, Jamie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using ClinicalTrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Assessing the impact of a research funder’s recommendation to consider core outcome sets
por: Hughes, Karen L., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptake
por: Barnes, Karen L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Results of an attempt to reproduce the STAP phenomenon
por: Aizawa, Shinichi
Publicado: (2016)

Stap vooruit in onderzoek naar preventie
por: Dera-de Bie, E.
Publicado: (2020)

The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities update (2015)
por: Gargon, E., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
por: Williamson, Paula R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement
por: Zwarenstein, Merrick, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Evaluation of the role of STAP1 in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
por: Danyel, Magdalena, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Core outcome sets in medical research
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

COMET IV meeting summary
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014)
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ
por: Weston, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Selective reporting in clinical trials - an examination of discrepancy rates in pre-specified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to the BMJ
por: Weston, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Representation of published core outcome sets for research in regulatory guidance: protocol
por: Dodd, Susanna, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Methods for standardising and monitoring surgical interventions in RCTs
por: Blencowe, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Guidance to detect, evaluate and prevent the problem of selective reporting in trial publications
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Multi-Round compared to Real-Time Delphi for consensus in core outcome set (COS) development: a randomised trial
por: Quirke, Fiona A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of published core outcome sets with outcomes recommended in regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency: cross sectional analysis
por: Saldanha, Ian J, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_kvnje06mqjm9d9l1pp4h3mtmro