Cargando…

Integrated epigenomic analysis stratifies chromatin remodellers into distinct functional groups

BACKGROUND: ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complexes are responsible for establishing and maintaining the positions of nucleosomes. Chromatin remodellers are targeted to chromatin by transcription factors and non-coding RNA to remodel the chromatin into functional states. However, the influence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giles, Katherine A., Gould, Cathryn M., Du, Qian, Skvortsova, Ksenia, Song, Jenny Z., Maddugoda, Madhavi P., Achinger-Kawecka, Joanna, Stirzaker, Clare, Clark, Susan J., Taberlay, Phillippa C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0258-9
_version_ 1783394542874001408
author Giles, Katherine A.
Gould, Cathryn M.
Du, Qian
Skvortsova, Ksenia
Song, Jenny Z.
Maddugoda, Madhavi P.
Achinger-Kawecka, Joanna
Stirzaker, Clare
Clark, Susan J.
Taberlay, Phillippa C.
author_facet Giles, Katherine A.
Gould, Cathryn M.
Du, Qian
Skvortsova, Ksenia
Song, Jenny Z.
Maddugoda, Madhavi P.
Achinger-Kawecka, Joanna
Stirzaker, Clare
Clark, Susan J.
Taberlay, Phillippa C.
author_sort Giles, Katherine A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complexes are responsible for establishing and maintaining the positions of nucleosomes. Chromatin remodellers are targeted to chromatin by transcription factors and non-coding RNA to remodel the chromatin into functional states. However, the influence of chromatin remodelling on shaping the functional epigenome is not well understood. Moreover, chromatin remodellers have not been extensively explored as a collective group across two-dimensional and three-dimensional epigenomic layers. RESULTS: Here, we have integrated the genome-wide binding profiles of eight chromatin remodellers together with DNA methylation, nucleosome positioning, histone modification and Hi-C chromosomal contacts to reveal that chromatin remodellers can be stratified into two functional groups. Group 1 (BRG1, SNF2H, CHD3 and CHD4) has a clear preference for binding at ‘actively marked’ chromatin and Group 2 (BRM, INO80, SNF2L and CHD1) for ‘repressively marked’ chromatin. We find that histone modifications and chromatin architectural features, but not DNA methylation, stratify the remodellers into these functional groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that chromatin remodelling events are synchronous and that chromatin remodellers themselves should be considered simultaneously and not as individual entities in isolation or necessarily by structural similarity, as they are traditionally classified. Their coordinated function should be considered by preference for chromatin features in order to gain a more accurate and comprehensive picture of chromatin regulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13072-019-0258-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6371444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63714442019-02-21 Integrated epigenomic analysis stratifies chromatin remodellers into distinct functional groups Giles, Katherine A. Gould, Cathryn M. Du, Qian Skvortsova, Ksenia Song, Jenny Z. Maddugoda, Madhavi P. Achinger-Kawecka, Joanna Stirzaker, Clare Clark, Susan J. Taberlay, Phillippa C. Epigenetics Chromatin Research BACKGROUND: ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complexes are responsible for establishing and maintaining the positions of nucleosomes. Chromatin remodellers are targeted to chromatin by transcription factors and non-coding RNA to remodel the chromatin into functional states. However, the influence of chromatin remodelling on shaping the functional epigenome is not well understood. Moreover, chromatin remodellers have not been extensively explored as a collective group across two-dimensional and three-dimensional epigenomic layers. RESULTS: Here, we have integrated the genome-wide binding profiles of eight chromatin remodellers together with DNA methylation, nucleosome positioning, histone modification and Hi-C chromosomal contacts to reveal that chromatin remodellers can be stratified into two functional groups. Group 1 (BRG1, SNF2H, CHD3 and CHD4) has a clear preference for binding at ‘actively marked’ chromatin and Group 2 (BRM, INO80, SNF2L and CHD1) for ‘repressively marked’ chromatin. We find that histone modifications and chromatin architectural features, but not DNA methylation, stratify the remodellers into these functional groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that chromatin remodelling events are synchronous and that chromatin remodellers themselves should be considered simultaneously and not as individual entities in isolation or necessarily by structural similarity, as they are traditionally classified. Their coordinated function should be considered by preference for chromatin features in order to gain a more accurate and comprehensive picture of chromatin regulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13072-019-0258-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6371444/ /pubmed/30755246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0258-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Giles, Katherine A.
Gould, Cathryn M.
Du, Qian
Skvortsova, Ksenia
Song, Jenny Z.
Maddugoda, Madhavi P.
Achinger-Kawecka, Joanna
Stirzaker, Clare
Clark, Susan J.
Taberlay, Phillippa C.
Integrated epigenomic analysis stratifies chromatin remodellers into distinct functional groups
title Integrated epigenomic analysis stratifies chromatin remodellers into distinct functional groups
title_full Integrated epigenomic analysis stratifies chromatin remodellers into distinct functional groups
title_fullStr Integrated epigenomic analysis stratifies chromatin remodellers into distinct functional groups
title_full_unstemmed Integrated epigenomic analysis stratifies chromatin remodellers into distinct functional groups
title_short Integrated epigenomic analysis stratifies chromatin remodellers into distinct functional groups
title_sort integrated epigenomic analysis stratifies chromatin remodellers into distinct functional groups
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0258-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gileskatherinea integratedepigenomicanalysisstratifieschromatinremodellersintodistinctfunctionalgroups
AT gouldcathrynm integratedepigenomicanalysisstratifieschromatinremodellersintodistinctfunctionalgroups
AT duqian integratedepigenomicanalysisstratifieschromatinremodellersintodistinctfunctionalgroups
AT skvortsovaksenia integratedepigenomicanalysisstratifieschromatinremodellersintodistinctfunctionalgroups
AT songjennyz integratedepigenomicanalysisstratifieschromatinremodellersintodistinctfunctionalgroups
AT maddugodamadhavip integratedepigenomicanalysisstratifieschromatinremodellersintodistinctfunctionalgroups
AT achingerkaweckajoanna integratedepigenomicanalysisstratifieschromatinremodellersintodistinctfunctionalgroups
AT stirzakerclare integratedepigenomicanalysisstratifieschromatinremodellersintodistinctfunctionalgroups
AT clarksusanj integratedepigenomicanalysisstratifieschromatinremodellersintodistinctfunctionalgroups
AT taberlayphillippac integratedepigenomicanalysisstratifieschromatinremodellersintodistinctfunctionalgroups