Cargando…

Blood volume analysis as a guide for dry weight determination in chronic hemodialysis patients: a crossover study

BACKGROUND: Volume overload and depletion both lead to high morbidity and mortality. Achieving euvolemia is a challenge in patients with end stage kidney disease on hemodialysis (HD). Blood volume analysis (BVA) uses radiolabeled albumin to determine intravascular blood volume (BV). The measured BV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malha, Line, Fattah, Hasan, Modersitzki, Frank, Goldfarb, David S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1211-7
_version_ 1783394567931822080
author Malha, Line
Fattah, Hasan
Modersitzki, Frank
Goldfarb, David S.
author_facet Malha, Line
Fattah, Hasan
Modersitzki, Frank
Goldfarb, David S.
author_sort Malha, Line
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Volume overload and depletion both lead to high morbidity and mortality. Achieving euvolemia is a challenge in patients with end stage kidney disease on hemodialysis (HD). Blood volume analysis (BVA) uses radiolabeled albumin to determine intravascular blood volume (BV). The measured BV is compared to an ideal BV (validated in healthy controls). We hypothesized that BVA could be used in HD to evaluate the adequacy of the current clinically prescribed “estimated dry weight” (EDW) and to titrate EDW in order to improve overall volume status. We were also interested in the reproducibility of BVA results in end stage kidney disease. METHODS: Twelve adults on chronic HD were recruited; 10 completed the study. BVA (Daxor, New York, NY, USA) was used to measure BV at baseline. EDW was kept the same if the patient was deemed to be euvolemic by BVA otherwise, the prescribed EDW was changed with the aim that measured BV would match ideal BV. A second BVA measurement was done 1–3 months later in order to measure BV again. RESULTS: Based on BVA, 6/10 patients were euvolemic at baseline and 5/10 were euvolemic at the second measurement. When comparing patients who had their prescribed EDW changed after the initial BVA to those who did not, both groups had similar differences between measured and ideal BV (P = 0.75). BV values were unchanged at the second measurement (P = 0.34) and there was no linear correlation between BV change and weight change (r(2) = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study is the first longitudinal measurement of BVA in HD patients. It revealed that changing weight did not proportionally change intravascular BV. BV remained stable for 1–3 months. BVA may not be helpful in clinically stable HD patients but studies on patients with hemodynamic instability and uncertain volume status are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02717533), first registered February 4, 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6371522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63715222019-02-21 Blood volume analysis as a guide for dry weight determination in chronic hemodialysis patients: a crossover study Malha, Line Fattah, Hasan Modersitzki, Frank Goldfarb, David S. BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Volume overload and depletion both lead to high morbidity and mortality. Achieving euvolemia is a challenge in patients with end stage kidney disease on hemodialysis (HD). Blood volume analysis (BVA) uses radiolabeled albumin to determine intravascular blood volume (BV). The measured BV is compared to an ideal BV (validated in healthy controls). We hypothesized that BVA could be used in HD to evaluate the adequacy of the current clinically prescribed “estimated dry weight” (EDW) and to titrate EDW in order to improve overall volume status. We were also interested in the reproducibility of BVA results in end stage kidney disease. METHODS: Twelve adults on chronic HD were recruited; 10 completed the study. BVA (Daxor, New York, NY, USA) was used to measure BV at baseline. EDW was kept the same if the patient was deemed to be euvolemic by BVA otherwise, the prescribed EDW was changed with the aim that measured BV would match ideal BV. A second BVA measurement was done 1–3 months later in order to measure BV again. RESULTS: Based on BVA, 6/10 patients were euvolemic at baseline and 5/10 were euvolemic at the second measurement. When comparing patients who had their prescribed EDW changed after the initial BVA to those who did not, both groups had similar differences between measured and ideal BV (P = 0.75). BV values were unchanged at the second measurement (P = 0.34) and there was no linear correlation between BV change and weight change (r(2) = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study is the first longitudinal measurement of BVA in HD patients. It revealed that changing weight did not proportionally change intravascular BV. BV remained stable for 1–3 months. BVA may not be helpful in clinically stable HD patients but studies on patients with hemodynamic instability and uncertain volume status are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02717533), first registered February 4, 2015. BioMed Central 2019-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6371522/ /pubmed/30744587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1211-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Malha, Line
Fattah, Hasan
Modersitzki, Frank
Goldfarb, David S.
Blood volume analysis as a guide for dry weight determination in chronic hemodialysis patients: a crossover study
title Blood volume analysis as a guide for dry weight determination in chronic hemodialysis patients: a crossover study
title_full Blood volume analysis as a guide for dry weight determination in chronic hemodialysis patients: a crossover study
title_fullStr Blood volume analysis as a guide for dry weight determination in chronic hemodialysis patients: a crossover study
title_full_unstemmed Blood volume analysis as a guide for dry weight determination in chronic hemodialysis patients: a crossover study
title_short Blood volume analysis as a guide for dry weight determination in chronic hemodialysis patients: a crossover study
title_sort blood volume analysis as a guide for dry weight determination in chronic hemodialysis patients: a crossover study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1211-7
work_keys_str_mv AT malhaline bloodvolumeanalysisasaguidefordryweightdeterminationinchronichemodialysispatientsacrossoverstudy
AT fattahhasan bloodvolumeanalysisasaguidefordryweightdeterminationinchronichemodialysispatientsacrossoverstudy
AT modersitzkifrank bloodvolumeanalysisasaguidefordryweightdeterminationinchronichemodialysispatientsacrossoverstudy
AT goldfarbdavids bloodvolumeanalysisasaguidefordryweightdeterminationinchronichemodialysispatientsacrossoverstudy