Cargando…
An empirical tool for estimating the share of unmet need due to healthcare inefficiencies, suboptimal access, and lack of effective technologies
BACKGROUND: Although there has been growing attention to the measurement of unmet need, which is the overall epidemiological burden of disease, current measures ignore the burden that could be eliminated from technological advances or more effective use of current technologies. METHODS: We developed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3914-7 |
_version_ | 1783394578452185088 |
---|---|
author | Incerti, Devin Browne, John Huber, Caroline Baker, Christine L. Makinson, Geoff Goren, Amir Willke, Richard Stevens, Warren |
author_facet | Incerti, Devin Browne, John Huber, Caroline Baker, Christine L. Makinson, Geoff Goren, Amir Willke, Richard Stevens, Warren |
author_sort | Incerti, Devin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although there has been growing attention to the measurement of unmet need, which is the overall epidemiological burden of disease, current measures ignore the burden that could be eliminated from technological advances or more effective use of current technologies. METHODS: We developed a conceptual framework and empirical tool that separates unmet need from met need and subcategorizes the causes of unmet need into suboptimal access to and ineffective use of current technologies and lack of current technologies. Statistical models were used to model the relationship between health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and treatment utilization using data from the National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). Predicted HR-QOL was combined with prevalence data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) to estimate met need and the causes of unmet need due to morbidity in the US and EU5 for five diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, breast cancer, Parkinson’s disease, hepatitis C, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). RESULTS: HR-QOL was positively correlated with adherence to medication and patient-perceived quality and negatively correlated with financial barriers. Met need was substantial across all disease and regions, although significant unmet need remains. While the majority of unmet need was driven by lack of technologies rather than ineffective use of current technologies, there was considerable variation across diseases and regions. Overall unmet need was largest for COPD, which had the highest prevalence of all diseases in this study. CONCLUSION: We developed a methodology that can inform decisions about which diseases to invest in and whether those investments should focus on improving access to currently available technologies or inventing new technologies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-3914-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6371562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63715622019-02-21 An empirical tool for estimating the share of unmet need due to healthcare inefficiencies, suboptimal access, and lack of effective technologies Incerti, Devin Browne, John Huber, Caroline Baker, Christine L. Makinson, Geoff Goren, Amir Willke, Richard Stevens, Warren BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Although there has been growing attention to the measurement of unmet need, which is the overall epidemiological burden of disease, current measures ignore the burden that could be eliminated from technological advances or more effective use of current technologies. METHODS: We developed a conceptual framework and empirical tool that separates unmet need from met need and subcategorizes the causes of unmet need into suboptimal access to and ineffective use of current technologies and lack of current technologies. Statistical models were used to model the relationship between health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and treatment utilization using data from the National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). Predicted HR-QOL was combined with prevalence data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) to estimate met need and the causes of unmet need due to morbidity in the US and EU5 for five diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, breast cancer, Parkinson’s disease, hepatitis C, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). RESULTS: HR-QOL was positively correlated with adherence to medication and patient-perceived quality and negatively correlated with financial barriers. Met need was substantial across all disease and regions, although significant unmet need remains. While the majority of unmet need was driven by lack of technologies rather than ineffective use of current technologies, there was considerable variation across diseases and regions. Overall unmet need was largest for COPD, which had the highest prevalence of all diseases in this study. CONCLUSION: We developed a methodology that can inform decisions about which diseases to invest in and whether those investments should focus on improving access to currently available technologies or inventing new technologies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-3914-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6371562/ /pubmed/30744613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3914-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Incerti, Devin Browne, John Huber, Caroline Baker, Christine L. Makinson, Geoff Goren, Amir Willke, Richard Stevens, Warren An empirical tool for estimating the share of unmet need due to healthcare inefficiencies, suboptimal access, and lack of effective technologies |
title | An empirical tool for estimating the share of unmet need due to healthcare inefficiencies, suboptimal access, and lack of effective technologies |
title_full | An empirical tool for estimating the share of unmet need due to healthcare inefficiencies, suboptimal access, and lack of effective technologies |
title_fullStr | An empirical tool for estimating the share of unmet need due to healthcare inefficiencies, suboptimal access, and lack of effective technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | An empirical tool for estimating the share of unmet need due to healthcare inefficiencies, suboptimal access, and lack of effective technologies |
title_short | An empirical tool for estimating the share of unmet need due to healthcare inefficiencies, suboptimal access, and lack of effective technologies |
title_sort | empirical tool for estimating the share of unmet need due to healthcare inefficiencies, suboptimal access, and lack of effective technologies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3914-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT incertidevin anempiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT brownejohn anempiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT hubercaroline anempiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT bakerchristinel anempiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT makinsongeoff anempiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT gorenamir anempiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT willkerichard anempiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT stevenswarren anempiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT incertidevin empiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT brownejohn empiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT hubercaroline empiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT bakerchristinel empiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT makinsongeoff empiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT gorenamir empiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT willkerichard empiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies AT stevenswarren empiricaltoolforestimatingtheshareofunmetneedduetohealthcareinefficienciessuboptimalaccessandlackofeffectivetechnologies |