Cargando…
Sample sizes based on three popular indices of risks
Sample size justification is a very crucial part in the design of clinical trials. In this paper, the authors derive a new formula to calculate the sample size for a binary outcome given one of the three popular indices of risk difference. The sample size based on the absolute difference is the fund...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30815629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2018-100011 |
_version_ | 1783394603313922048 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Hongyue Wang, Bokai Tu, Xin M Liu, Jinyuan Feng, Changyong |
author_facet | Wang, Hongyue Wang, Bokai Tu, Xin M Liu, Jinyuan Feng, Changyong |
author_sort | Wang, Hongyue |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sample size justification is a very crucial part in the design of clinical trials. In this paper, the authors derive a new formula to calculate the sample size for a binary outcome given one of the three popular indices of risk difference. The sample size based on the absolute difference is the fundamental one, which can be easily used to derive sample size given the risk ratio or OR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6371655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63716552019-02-27 Sample sizes based on three popular indices of risks Wang, Hongyue Wang, Bokai Tu, Xin M Liu, Jinyuan Feng, Changyong Gen Psychiatr Biostatistical Methods in Psychiatry Sample size justification is a very crucial part in the design of clinical trials. In this paper, the authors derive a new formula to calculate the sample size for a binary outcome given one of the three popular indices of risk difference. The sample size based on the absolute difference is the fundamental one, which can be easily used to derive sample size given the risk ratio or OR. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6371655/ /pubmed/30815629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2018-100011 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Biostatistical Methods in Psychiatry Wang, Hongyue Wang, Bokai Tu, Xin M Liu, Jinyuan Feng, Changyong Sample sizes based on three popular indices of risks |
title | Sample sizes based on three popular indices of risks |
title_full | Sample sizes based on three popular indices of risks |
title_fullStr | Sample sizes based on three popular indices of risks |
title_full_unstemmed | Sample sizes based on three popular indices of risks |
title_short | Sample sizes based on three popular indices of risks |
title_sort | sample sizes based on three popular indices of risks |
topic | Biostatistical Methods in Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30815629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2018-100011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghongyue samplesizesbasedonthreepopularindicesofrisks AT wangbokai samplesizesbasedonthreepopularindicesofrisks AT tuxinm samplesizesbasedonthreepopularindicesofrisks AT liujinyuan samplesizesbasedonthreepopularindicesofrisks AT fengchangyong samplesizesbasedonthreepopularindicesofrisks |