Cargando…
Good publication practice guideline 3: Evolving standards for medical writers
Publications in peer-reviewed journals as well as oral and poster presentations for scientific conferences comes under the purview of GPP3 guideline. The GPP3 has kept pace with the changes in publication practices and focusses on every burning aspect of publications. The present paper evaluates the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834200 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_31_18 |
_version_ | 1783394614603939840 |
---|---|
author | Anand, Gaurav Joshi, Mohit |
author_facet | Anand, Gaurav Joshi, Mohit |
author_sort | Anand, Gaurav |
collection | PubMed |
description | Publications in peer-reviewed journals as well as oral and poster presentations for scientific conferences comes under the purview of GPP3 guideline. The GPP3 has kept pace with the changes in publication practices and focusses on every burning aspect of publications. The present paper evaluates the purview of GPP3 guideline in context with the evolving role of medical writer (MW) in the present times. A MW plays an important role to in producing high quality authentic documents. The role of professional MW have previously been emphasised upon in previous versions of GPP guidelines, and have been instrumental in acknowledging role of MWs in medical publications and cementing their existence rather than them being termed as ‘ghostwriters’. Additionally the paper focuses on evolving publication and research presentation standards with reference to other guidelines. The paper also focusses on clarity on reimbursements which is in contrast to other Acts (Sunshine Act). Most importantly, the expectations from subsequent guidelines are also discussed which may form basis of subsequent GPP guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6371703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63717032019-03-04 Good publication practice guideline 3: Evolving standards for medical writers Anand, Gaurav Joshi, Mohit Perspect Clin Res Review Article Publications in peer-reviewed journals as well as oral and poster presentations for scientific conferences comes under the purview of GPP3 guideline. The GPP3 has kept pace with the changes in publication practices and focusses on every burning aspect of publications. The present paper evaluates the purview of GPP3 guideline in context with the evolving role of medical writer (MW) in the present times. A MW plays an important role to in producing high quality authentic documents. The role of professional MW have previously been emphasised upon in previous versions of GPP guidelines, and have been instrumental in acknowledging role of MWs in medical publications and cementing their existence rather than them being termed as ‘ghostwriters’. Additionally the paper focuses on evolving publication and research presentation standards with reference to other guidelines. The paper also focusses on clarity on reimbursements which is in contrast to other Acts (Sunshine Act). Most importantly, the expectations from subsequent guidelines are also discussed which may form basis of subsequent GPP guidelines. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6371703/ /pubmed/30834200 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_31_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Perspectives in Clinical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Anand, Gaurav Joshi, Mohit Good publication practice guideline 3: Evolving standards for medical writers |
title | Good publication practice guideline 3: Evolving standards for medical writers |
title_full | Good publication practice guideline 3: Evolving standards for medical writers |
title_fullStr | Good publication practice guideline 3: Evolving standards for medical writers |
title_full_unstemmed | Good publication practice guideline 3: Evolving standards for medical writers |
title_short | Good publication practice guideline 3: Evolving standards for medical writers |
title_sort | good publication practice guideline 3: evolving standards for medical writers |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834200 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_31_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anandgaurav goodpublicationpracticeguideline3evolvingstandardsformedicalwriters AT joshimohit goodpublicationpracticeguideline3evolvingstandardsformedicalwriters |