Cargando…

Effect of a planned training session on good clinical practice knowledge in research professionals: A pilot study

CONTEXT: Adherence to good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines by the researcher provides public confidence that the rights, safety and well-being of human participants involved in research are protected. It has been observed that researchers require basic GCP training. Considering this, we had decid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Awatagiri, Kasturi, Gadgil, Durga, Kannan, Sadhana, Rane, Pallavi, Bandekar, Bhavesh, Sawant, Nilam, Parikh, Prafulla, Murthy, Vedang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834203
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_146_17
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: Adherence to good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines by the researcher provides public confidence that the rights, safety and well-being of human participants involved in research are protected. It has been observed that researchers require basic GCP training. Considering this, we had decided to conduct a training session on overview of GCP. AIMS: To strengthen the knowledge and awareness regarding GCP. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The design of the study was quasi-experimental one group, pre-test and post-test design and the study was conducted at ACTREC among healthcare professionals at Tata Memorial Centre. METHODS AND MATERIAL: A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect the data in pre and post-test. A total of 138 participants were participated in the study. The training session was pre-planned which included a lecture followed by the question-answer session. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to assess the effect of the planned teaching programme. Macnemar test was used for item wise comparison of pre and post-test scores. Mann Whitney test was used to determine the significant difference between knowledge scores and selected demographic variables. RESULTS: This study has resulted in overall improvement of knowledge with a median difference of 5 with P-value <0.001. There was a statistically significant improvement of knowledge between pre and post-test of those having GCP training in the past, working group and education. CONCLUSIONS: The exercise of holding training program was found to be significant in improving the knowledge base of participants, especially investigators and study coordinators.