Cargando…

Influencing Side-Effects to Medicinal Treatments: A Systematic Review of Brief Psychological Interventions

Background: Nocebo effects contribute to a large proportion of the non-specific side-effects attributed to medications and are mainly generated through negative expectations. Previous reviews show that interventions designed to change participants' expectations have a small effect on pain exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webster, Rebecca K., Rubin, G. James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804822
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00775
_version_ 1783394622968430592
author Webster, Rebecca K.
Rubin, G. James
author_facet Webster, Rebecca K.
Rubin, G. James
author_sort Webster, Rebecca K.
collection PubMed
description Background: Nocebo effects contribute to a large proportion of the non-specific side-effects attributed to medications and are mainly generated through negative expectations. Previous reviews show that interventions designed to change participants' expectations have a small effect on pain experience. They are also effective in reducing side-effects caused by exposure to sham medications. To date, there has been no review of the influence of such interventions on symptoms attributed to real medicinal treatments. Objective: To review studies using a randomized controlled design testing the effect of brief psychological interventions compared to usual practice on the side-effect experience to medicinal treatments in healthy volunteers and patients. Methods: We searched Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and Cochrane CENTRAL using search terms for randomized controlled trials along with “nocebo,” “placebo effect,” “medication,” “side-effects,” and associated terms. Studies were eligible if they studied a human population, used an active medicine, delivered a brief psychological intervention intended to influence side-effect reporting compared to usual care or no intervention, and used a randomized controlled design. Because of the heterogeneity of the literature we used a narrative synthesis and assessed evidence quality using the GRADE approach. Results: Our database search and supplementary search of the reference sections of included studies retrieved 50,140 citations. After screening, full text review and manual reference searches, 27 studies were included. The quality of the studies and evidence was judged to be low. The strongest and most consistent effect came from omitting side-effect information, although surprisingly de-emphasizing side-effects did not affect side-effect reporting. Other techniques, including priming, distraction, and altering the perception of branding, produced mixed results. Conclusion: Brief psychological interventions can influence side-effect reporting to active medications. Research is currently investigating new ways to de-emphasize side-effects whilst still upholding informed consent, but larger confirmatory trials with suitable control groups are needed. The literature in this area would be improved by more detailed reporting of studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6371736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63717362019-02-25 Influencing Side-Effects to Medicinal Treatments: A Systematic Review of Brief Psychological Interventions Webster, Rebecca K. Rubin, G. James Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: Nocebo effects contribute to a large proportion of the non-specific side-effects attributed to medications and are mainly generated through negative expectations. Previous reviews show that interventions designed to change participants' expectations have a small effect on pain experience. They are also effective in reducing side-effects caused by exposure to sham medications. To date, there has been no review of the influence of such interventions on symptoms attributed to real medicinal treatments. Objective: To review studies using a randomized controlled design testing the effect of brief psychological interventions compared to usual practice on the side-effect experience to medicinal treatments in healthy volunteers and patients. Methods: We searched Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and Cochrane CENTRAL using search terms for randomized controlled trials along with “nocebo,” “placebo effect,” “medication,” “side-effects,” and associated terms. Studies were eligible if they studied a human population, used an active medicine, delivered a brief psychological intervention intended to influence side-effect reporting compared to usual care or no intervention, and used a randomized controlled design. Because of the heterogeneity of the literature we used a narrative synthesis and assessed evidence quality using the GRADE approach. Results: Our database search and supplementary search of the reference sections of included studies retrieved 50,140 citations. After screening, full text review and manual reference searches, 27 studies were included. The quality of the studies and evidence was judged to be low. The strongest and most consistent effect came from omitting side-effect information, although surprisingly de-emphasizing side-effects did not affect side-effect reporting. Other techniques, including priming, distraction, and altering the perception of branding, produced mixed results. Conclusion: Brief psychological interventions can influence side-effect reporting to active medications. Research is currently investigating new ways to de-emphasize side-effects whilst still upholding informed consent, but larger confirmatory trials with suitable control groups are needed. The literature in this area would be improved by more detailed reporting of studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6371736/ /pubmed/30804822 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00775 Text en Copyright © 2019 Webster and Rubin. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Webster, Rebecca K.
Rubin, G. James
Influencing Side-Effects to Medicinal Treatments: A Systematic Review of Brief Psychological Interventions
title Influencing Side-Effects to Medicinal Treatments: A Systematic Review of Brief Psychological Interventions
title_full Influencing Side-Effects to Medicinal Treatments: A Systematic Review of Brief Psychological Interventions
title_fullStr Influencing Side-Effects to Medicinal Treatments: A Systematic Review of Brief Psychological Interventions
title_full_unstemmed Influencing Side-Effects to Medicinal Treatments: A Systematic Review of Brief Psychological Interventions
title_short Influencing Side-Effects to Medicinal Treatments: A Systematic Review of Brief Psychological Interventions
title_sort influencing side-effects to medicinal treatments: a systematic review of brief psychological interventions
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804822
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00775
work_keys_str_mv AT websterrebeccak influencingsideeffectstomedicinaltreatmentsasystematicreviewofbriefpsychologicalinterventions
AT rubingjames influencingsideeffectstomedicinaltreatmentsasystematicreviewofbriefpsychologicalinterventions