Cargando…

Native American Perspectives on Health and Traditional Ecological Knowledge

BACKGROUND: Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is a conceptual framework that highlights Indigenous knowledge (IK) systems. Although scientific literature has noted the relevance of TEK for environmental research since the 1980s, little attention has been given to how Native American (NA) schola...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isaac, Gwyneira, Finn, Symma, Joe, Jennie R., Hoover, Elizabeth, Gone, Joseph P., Lefthand-Begay, Clarita, Hill, Stewart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Environmental Health Perspectives 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP1944
_version_ 1783394628975722496
author Isaac, Gwyneira
Finn, Symma
Joe, Jennie R.
Hoover, Elizabeth
Gone, Joseph P.
Lefthand-Begay, Clarita
Hill, Stewart
author_facet Isaac, Gwyneira
Finn, Symma
Joe, Jennie R.
Hoover, Elizabeth
Gone, Joseph P.
Lefthand-Begay, Clarita
Hill, Stewart
author_sort Isaac, Gwyneira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is a conceptual framework that highlights Indigenous knowledge (IK) systems. Although scientific literature has noted the relevance of TEK for environmental research since the 1980s, little attention has been given to how Native American (NA) scholars engage with it to shape tribal-based research on health, nor how non-Native scholars can coordinate their approaches with TEK. This coordination is of particular importance for environmental health sciences (EHS) research exploring interdisciplinary approaches and the integration of environmental and human health. OBJECTIVE: Our perspective on TEK arose from a series of Health and Culture Research Group (HCRG) workshops that identified gaps in existing EHS methodologies that are based on a reliance on Euro-American concepts for assessing environmental exposures in tribal communities. These prior methods neither take into account cultural behavior nor community responses to these. Our objective is to consider NA perspectives on TEK when analyzing relationships between health and the environment and to look at how these may be applied to address this gap. DISCUSSION: The authors—the majority of whom are NA scholars—highlight two research areas that consider health from a TEK perspective: food systems and knowledge of medicinal plants. This research has yielded data, methods, and knowledge that have helped Indigenous communities better define and reduce health risks and protect local natural food resources, and this TEK approach may prove of value to EHS research. CONCLUSION: NA perspectives on TEK resulting from the HCRG workshops provide an opportunity for developing more accurate Indigenous health indicators (IHI) reflecting the conceptualizations of health maintained in these communities. This approach has the potential to bridge the scientific study of exposure with methods addressing a tribal perspective on the sociocultural determinants of health, identifying potential new areas of inquiry in EHS that afford nuanced evaluations of exposures and outcomes in tribal communities. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1944
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6371761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Environmental Health Perspectives
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63717612019-05-02 Native American Perspectives on Health and Traditional Ecological Knowledge Isaac, Gwyneira Finn, Symma Joe, Jennie R. Hoover, Elizabeth Gone, Joseph P. Lefthand-Begay, Clarita Hill, Stewart Environ Health Perspect Commentary BACKGROUND: Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is a conceptual framework that highlights Indigenous knowledge (IK) systems. Although scientific literature has noted the relevance of TEK for environmental research since the 1980s, little attention has been given to how Native American (NA) scholars engage with it to shape tribal-based research on health, nor how non-Native scholars can coordinate their approaches with TEK. This coordination is of particular importance for environmental health sciences (EHS) research exploring interdisciplinary approaches and the integration of environmental and human health. OBJECTIVE: Our perspective on TEK arose from a series of Health and Culture Research Group (HCRG) workshops that identified gaps in existing EHS methodologies that are based on a reliance on Euro-American concepts for assessing environmental exposures in tribal communities. These prior methods neither take into account cultural behavior nor community responses to these. Our objective is to consider NA perspectives on TEK when analyzing relationships between health and the environment and to look at how these may be applied to address this gap. DISCUSSION: The authors—the majority of whom are NA scholars—highlight two research areas that consider health from a TEK perspective: food systems and knowledge of medicinal plants. This research has yielded data, methods, and knowledge that have helped Indigenous communities better define and reduce health risks and protect local natural food resources, and this TEK approach may prove of value to EHS research. CONCLUSION: NA perspectives on TEK resulting from the HCRG workshops provide an opportunity for developing more accurate Indigenous health indicators (IHI) reflecting the conceptualizations of health maintained in these communities. This approach has the potential to bridge the scientific study of exposure with methods addressing a tribal perspective on the sociocultural determinants of health, identifying potential new areas of inquiry in EHS that afford nuanced evaluations of exposures and outcomes in tribal communities. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1944 Environmental Health Perspectives 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6371761/ /pubmed/30675814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP1944 Text en EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted.
spellingShingle Commentary
Isaac, Gwyneira
Finn, Symma
Joe, Jennie R.
Hoover, Elizabeth
Gone, Joseph P.
Lefthand-Begay, Clarita
Hill, Stewart
Native American Perspectives on Health and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title Native American Perspectives on Health and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title_full Native American Perspectives on Health and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title_fullStr Native American Perspectives on Health and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Native American Perspectives on Health and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title_short Native American Perspectives on Health and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title_sort native american perspectives on health and traditional ecological knowledge
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP1944
work_keys_str_mv AT isaacgwyneira nativeamericanperspectivesonhealthandtraditionalecologicalknowledge
AT finnsymma nativeamericanperspectivesonhealthandtraditionalecologicalknowledge
AT joejennier nativeamericanperspectivesonhealthandtraditionalecologicalknowledge
AT hooverelizabeth nativeamericanperspectivesonhealthandtraditionalecologicalknowledge
AT gonejosephp nativeamericanperspectivesonhealthandtraditionalecologicalknowledge
AT lefthandbegayclarita nativeamericanperspectivesonhealthandtraditionalecologicalknowledge
AT hillstewart nativeamericanperspectivesonhealthandtraditionalecologicalknowledge