Cargando…
Does picture background matter? Peopleʼs evaluation of pigs in different farm settings
Pictures of farm animals and their husbandry systems are frequently presented in the media and are mostly connected to discussions surrounding farm animal welfare. How such pictures are perceived by the broader public is not fully understood thus far. It is presumable that the animalsʼ expressions a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30753189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211256 |
_version_ | 1783394685918642176 |
---|---|
author | Busch, Gesa Gauly, Sarah von Meyer-Höfer, Marie Spiller, Achim |
author_facet | Busch, Gesa Gauly, Sarah von Meyer-Höfer, Marie Spiller, Achim |
author_sort | Busch, Gesa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pictures of farm animals and their husbandry systems are frequently presented in the media and are mostly connected to discussions surrounding farm animal welfare. How such pictures are perceived by the broader public is not fully understood thus far. It is presumable that the animalsʼ expressions and body languages as well as their depicted environment or husbandry systems affect public perception. Therefore, the aim of this study is to test how the evaluation of a picture showing a farmed pig is influenced by portrayed attributes, as well as participants’ perceptions of pigs’ abilities in general, and if connection to agriculture has an influence. In an online survey, 1,019 German residents were shown four modified pictures of a pig in a pen. The pictures varied with regards to facial expression and body language of the pig (ʽhappyʼ versus ʽunhappyʼ pig) and the barn setting (straw versus slatted floor pen). Respondents were asked to evaluate both the pen and the welfare of the pig. Two Linear Mixed Models were calculated to analyze effects on pig and pen evaluation. For the pictures, the pen had the largest influence on both pig and pen evaluation, followed by the pigʼs appearance and participants’ beliefs in pigs’ mental and emotional abilities, as well as their connection to agriculture. The welfare of both the ʽhappyʼ and the ʽunhappyʼ pig was assessed to be higher in the straw setting compared to the slatted floor setting in our study, and even the ʽunhappy pigʼ on straw was perceived more positively than the ʽhappy pigʼ on slatted floor. The straw pen was evaluated as being better than the slatted floor pen on the pictures we presented but the pens also differed in level of dirt on the walls (more dirt in the slatted floor pen), which might have influenced the results. Nevertheless, the results suggest that enduring aspects of pictures such as the husbandry system influence perceptions more than a momentary body expression of the pig, at least in the settings tested herein. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6372140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63721402019-03-01 Does picture background matter? Peopleʼs evaluation of pigs in different farm settings Busch, Gesa Gauly, Sarah von Meyer-Höfer, Marie Spiller, Achim PLoS One Research Article Pictures of farm animals and their husbandry systems are frequently presented in the media and are mostly connected to discussions surrounding farm animal welfare. How such pictures are perceived by the broader public is not fully understood thus far. It is presumable that the animalsʼ expressions and body languages as well as their depicted environment or husbandry systems affect public perception. Therefore, the aim of this study is to test how the evaluation of a picture showing a farmed pig is influenced by portrayed attributes, as well as participants’ perceptions of pigs’ abilities in general, and if connection to agriculture has an influence. In an online survey, 1,019 German residents were shown four modified pictures of a pig in a pen. The pictures varied with regards to facial expression and body language of the pig (ʽhappyʼ versus ʽunhappyʼ pig) and the barn setting (straw versus slatted floor pen). Respondents were asked to evaluate both the pen and the welfare of the pig. Two Linear Mixed Models were calculated to analyze effects on pig and pen evaluation. For the pictures, the pen had the largest influence on both pig and pen evaluation, followed by the pigʼs appearance and participants’ beliefs in pigs’ mental and emotional abilities, as well as their connection to agriculture. The welfare of both the ʽhappyʼ and the ʽunhappyʼ pig was assessed to be higher in the straw setting compared to the slatted floor setting in our study, and even the ʽunhappy pigʼ on straw was perceived more positively than the ʽhappy pigʼ on slatted floor. The straw pen was evaluated as being better than the slatted floor pen on the pictures we presented but the pens also differed in level of dirt on the walls (more dirt in the slatted floor pen), which might have influenced the results. Nevertheless, the results suggest that enduring aspects of pictures such as the husbandry system influence perceptions more than a momentary body expression of the pig, at least in the settings tested herein. Public Library of Science 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6372140/ /pubmed/30753189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211256 Text en © 2019 Busch et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Busch, Gesa Gauly, Sarah von Meyer-Höfer, Marie Spiller, Achim Does picture background matter? Peopleʼs evaluation of pigs in different farm settings |
title | Does picture background matter? Peopleʼs evaluation of pigs in different farm settings |
title_full | Does picture background matter? Peopleʼs evaluation of pigs in different farm settings |
title_fullStr | Does picture background matter? Peopleʼs evaluation of pigs in different farm settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Does picture background matter? Peopleʼs evaluation of pigs in different farm settings |
title_short | Does picture background matter? Peopleʼs evaluation of pigs in different farm settings |
title_sort | does picture background matter? peopleʼs evaluation of pigs in different farm settings |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30753189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buschgesa doespicturebackgroundmatterpeopleʼsevaluationofpigsindifferentfarmsettings AT gaulysarah doespicturebackgroundmatterpeopleʼsevaluationofpigsindifferentfarmsettings AT vonmeyerhofermarie doespicturebackgroundmatterpeopleʼsevaluationofpigsindifferentfarmsettings AT spillerachim doespicturebackgroundmatterpeopleʼsevaluationofpigsindifferentfarmsettings |