Cargando…
Reliable novelty: New should not trump true
Although a case can be made for rewarding scientists for risky, novel science rather than for incremental, reliable science, novelty without reliability ceases to be science. The currently available evidence suggests that the most prestigious journals are no better at detecting unreliable science th...
Autor principal: | Brembs, Björn |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30753184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000117 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Traps and trumps from adjacent-to-tumor samples in gastric cancer research
por: de Assumpção, Paulo Pimentel, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
What an Emerging Trump Administration Means for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health
por: Gonzales, Gilbert, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Estrogen Receptors in Colorectal Cancer: Facts, Novelties and Perspectives
por: Ditonno, Ilaria, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Co‐option of stress mechanisms in the origin of evolutionary novelties
por: Love, Alan C., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
por: Brembs, Björn
Publicado: (2018)