Cargando…

Field evaluation of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test for early detection of cholera in Bangladesh

BACKGROUND: Cholera remains a substantial health burden in Asia and Africa particularly in resource poor settings. The standard procedures to identify the etiological organism V. cholerae are isolation from microbiological culture from stool as well as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Both the proce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Islam, Md. Taufiqul, Khan, Ashraful Islam, Sayeed, Md. Abu, Amin, Jakia, Islam, Kamrul, Alam, Nur, Sultana, Nishat, Jahan, Noor, Rashid, Md. Mahbubur, Khan, Zahid Hasan, Zion, Mazharul Islam, Afrad, Mokibul Hassan, Siddique, Shah Alam, Khanam, Farhana, Begum, Yasmin Ara, Islam, Muhammad Shariful, Qadri, Firdausi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007124
_version_ 1783394699865751552
author Islam, Md. Taufiqul
Khan, Ashraful Islam
Sayeed, Md. Abu
Amin, Jakia
Islam, Kamrul
Alam, Nur
Sultana, Nishat
Jahan, Noor
Rashid, Md. Mahbubur
Khan, Zahid Hasan
Zion, Mazharul Islam
Afrad, Mokibul Hassan
Siddique, Shah Alam
Khanam, Farhana
Begum, Yasmin Ara
Islam, Muhammad Shariful
Qadri, Firdausi
author_facet Islam, Md. Taufiqul
Khan, Ashraful Islam
Sayeed, Md. Abu
Amin, Jakia
Islam, Kamrul
Alam, Nur
Sultana, Nishat
Jahan, Noor
Rashid, Md. Mahbubur
Khan, Zahid Hasan
Zion, Mazharul Islam
Afrad, Mokibul Hassan
Siddique, Shah Alam
Khanam, Farhana
Begum, Yasmin Ara
Islam, Muhammad Shariful
Qadri, Firdausi
author_sort Islam, Md. Taufiqul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cholera remains a substantial health burden in Asia and Africa particularly in resource poor settings. The standard procedures to identify the etiological organism V. cholerae are isolation from microbiological culture from stool as well as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Both the processes are highly lab oriented, labor extensive, time consuming, and expensive. In an effort to control for outbreaks and epidemics; an effective, convenient, quick and relatively less expensive detection method is imperative, without compromising the sensitivity and specificity that exists at present. The objective of this component of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for cholera diagnosis. METHODS: In Bangladesh, nationwide cholera surveillance is ongoing in 22 hospitals covering all 8 divisions of the country since June, 2016. In the surveillance, stool samples have been collected from patients presenting to hospitals with acute watery diarrhea. Crystal VC(TM) (Span diagnostics, India) and Cholkit (locally produced RDT) have been used to detect V. cholerae from stool samples. Samples have also been sent to the main laboratory at icddr,b where the culture based isolation is routinely performed. All the tests were carried out for both direct and enriched stool samples. RDT sensitivity and specificity were calculated using stool culture as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 7720 samples were tested. Among these, 5865 samples were solely tested with Crystal VC and 1355 samples with Cholkit whereas 381 samples were tested with both the RDTs. In comparison with culture, direct testing with Crystal VC showed a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI: 50.6% to 87.9%) and specificity of 86.8% (95% CI: 82.8% to 90.1%). After enrichment the sensitivity and specificity was 68% (95% CI: 46.5% to 85.1%) and 97.5% (95% CI: 95.3% to 98.8%) respectively. The direct Cholkit test showed sensitivity of 76% (95% CI: 54.9% to 90.6%) and specificity of 90.2% (95% CI: 86.6% to 93.1%). CONCLUSION: This evaluation has demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of Cholkit is similar to the commercially available test, Crystal VC when used in field settings for detecting V. cholerae from stool specimens. The findings from this study suggest that the Cholkit could be a possible alternative for cholera endemic regions where V. cholerae O1 is the major causative organism causing cholera.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6372204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63722042019-03-01 Field evaluation of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test for early detection of cholera in Bangladesh Islam, Md. Taufiqul Khan, Ashraful Islam Sayeed, Md. Abu Amin, Jakia Islam, Kamrul Alam, Nur Sultana, Nishat Jahan, Noor Rashid, Md. Mahbubur Khan, Zahid Hasan Zion, Mazharul Islam Afrad, Mokibul Hassan Siddique, Shah Alam Khanam, Farhana Begum, Yasmin Ara Islam, Muhammad Shariful Qadri, Firdausi PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Cholera remains a substantial health burden in Asia and Africa particularly in resource poor settings. The standard procedures to identify the etiological organism V. cholerae are isolation from microbiological culture from stool as well as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Both the processes are highly lab oriented, labor extensive, time consuming, and expensive. In an effort to control for outbreaks and epidemics; an effective, convenient, quick and relatively less expensive detection method is imperative, without compromising the sensitivity and specificity that exists at present. The objective of this component of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for cholera diagnosis. METHODS: In Bangladesh, nationwide cholera surveillance is ongoing in 22 hospitals covering all 8 divisions of the country since June, 2016. In the surveillance, stool samples have been collected from patients presenting to hospitals with acute watery diarrhea. Crystal VC(TM) (Span diagnostics, India) and Cholkit (locally produced RDT) have been used to detect V. cholerae from stool samples. Samples have also been sent to the main laboratory at icddr,b where the culture based isolation is routinely performed. All the tests were carried out for both direct and enriched stool samples. RDT sensitivity and specificity were calculated using stool culture as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 7720 samples were tested. Among these, 5865 samples were solely tested with Crystal VC and 1355 samples with Cholkit whereas 381 samples were tested with both the RDTs. In comparison with culture, direct testing with Crystal VC showed a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI: 50.6% to 87.9%) and specificity of 86.8% (95% CI: 82.8% to 90.1%). After enrichment the sensitivity and specificity was 68% (95% CI: 46.5% to 85.1%) and 97.5% (95% CI: 95.3% to 98.8%) respectively. The direct Cholkit test showed sensitivity of 76% (95% CI: 54.9% to 90.6%) and specificity of 90.2% (95% CI: 86.6% to 93.1%). CONCLUSION: This evaluation has demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of Cholkit is similar to the commercially available test, Crystal VC when used in field settings for detecting V. cholerae from stool specimens. The findings from this study suggest that the Cholkit could be a possible alternative for cholera endemic regions where V. cholerae O1 is the major causative organism causing cholera. Public Library of Science 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6372204/ /pubmed/30703097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007124 Text en © 2019 Islam et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Islam, Md. Taufiqul
Khan, Ashraful Islam
Sayeed, Md. Abu
Amin, Jakia
Islam, Kamrul
Alam, Nur
Sultana, Nishat
Jahan, Noor
Rashid, Md. Mahbubur
Khan, Zahid Hasan
Zion, Mazharul Islam
Afrad, Mokibul Hassan
Siddique, Shah Alam
Khanam, Farhana
Begum, Yasmin Ara
Islam, Muhammad Shariful
Qadri, Firdausi
Field evaluation of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test for early detection of cholera in Bangladesh
title Field evaluation of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test for early detection of cholera in Bangladesh
title_full Field evaluation of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test for early detection of cholera in Bangladesh
title_fullStr Field evaluation of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test for early detection of cholera in Bangladesh
title_full_unstemmed Field evaluation of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test for early detection of cholera in Bangladesh
title_short Field evaluation of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test for early detection of cholera in Bangladesh
title_sort field evaluation of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test for early detection of cholera in bangladesh
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007124
work_keys_str_mv AT islammdtaufiqul fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT khanashrafulislam fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT sayeedmdabu fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT aminjakia fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT islamkamrul fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT alamnur fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT sultananishat fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT jahannoor fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT rashidmdmahbubur fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT khanzahidhasan fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT zionmazharulislam fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT afradmokibulhassan fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT siddiqueshahalam fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT khanamfarhana fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT begumyasminara fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT islammuhammadshariful fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh
AT qadrifirdausi fieldevaluationofalocallyproducedrapiddiagnostictestforearlydetectionofcholerainbangladesh