Cargando…

A Medical Article Publishing Club for Junior Doctors: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

Introduction There is an increasing expectation for junior doctors to have a publication. However, there is not much help provided to bridge the gap between project completion or case reporting and getting published. Our previous study demonstrated that junior doctors felt that involvement in medica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oyibo, Samson O, Brij, Seema O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788190
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3701
_version_ 1783394707435421696
author Oyibo, Samson O
Brij, Seema O
author_facet Oyibo, Samson O
Brij, Seema O
author_sort Oyibo, Samson O
collection PubMed
description Introduction There is an increasing expectation for junior doctors to have a publication. However, there is not much help provided to bridge the gap between project completion or case reporting and getting published. Our previous study demonstrated that junior doctors felt that involvement in medical article publishing contributes to learning and that it is an effective teaching method. Junior doctors also agreed that it is difficult to get published. Based on this study we started a medical article publishing (MAP) club. The aim of this study was to assess user satisfaction with the MAP club. Materials and methods Questionnaires were sent to 12 doctors who obtained advice from the MAP club since its inception in December 2017. The questionnaire contained two questions: (1) how useful they found the advice and guidance received and (2) how likely they were to recommend the MAP club to their colleagues. The 10-point Likert scale responses were analyzed quantitatively. Written comments and suggestions were analyzed qualitatively by thematic analysis. Results Respondents gave scores of either 9 or 10 to both questions indicating that they found the advice and guidance received very useful and that they were very likely to recommend the MAP club to their colleagues (weighted scores 9.75 and 9.92, respectively). The thematic analysis revealed three main themes: (1) positive features of the MAP club, (2) what participants gained from the MAP club and (3) recommendations for the future. The majority of respondents commented that the club was useful, helpful, supportive, and informative. More than a third commented that the club provided encouragement, confidence, practical tips, learning experience, and the opportunity to publish. A similar proportion asked that we keep the club going and provide dedicated teaching sessions. Conclusions Junior doctors feel that the MAP club has positive features and has contributed to their learning, education, and publishing skills. A proportion of them would also like to receive formal teaching sessions concerning medical article publishing. This study has highlighted the benefits and importance of establishing a medical article publishing club for junior doctors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6372248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63722482019-02-20 A Medical Article Publishing Club for Junior Doctors: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Oyibo, Samson O Brij, Seema O Cureus Medical Education Introduction There is an increasing expectation for junior doctors to have a publication. However, there is not much help provided to bridge the gap between project completion or case reporting and getting published. Our previous study demonstrated that junior doctors felt that involvement in medical article publishing contributes to learning and that it is an effective teaching method. Junior doctors also agreed that it is difficult to get published. Based on this study we started a medical article publishing (MAP) club. The aim of this study was to assess user satisfaction with the MAP club. Materials and methods Questionnaires were sent to 12 doctors who obtained advice from the MAP club since its inception in December 2017. The questionnaire contained two questions: (1) how useful they found the advice and guidance received and (2) how likely they were to recommend the MAP club to their colleagues. The 10-point Likert scale responses were analyzed quantitatively. Written comments and suggestions were analyzed qualitatively by thematic analysis. Results Respondents gave scores of either 9 or 10 to both questions indicating that they found the advice and guidance received very useful and that they were very likely to recommend the MAP club to their colleagues (weighted scores 9.75 and 9.92, respectively). The thematic analysis revealed three main themes: (1) positive features of the MAP club, (2) what participants gained from the MAP club and (3) recommendations for the future. The majority of respondents commented that the club was useful, helpful, supportive, and informative. More than a third commented that the club provided encouragement, confidence, practical tips, learning experience, and the opportunity to publish. A similar proportion asked that we keep the club going and provide dedicated teaching sessions. Conclusions Junior doctors feel that the MAP club has positive features and has contributed to their learning, education, and publishing skills. A proportion of them would also like to receive formal teaching sessions concerning medical article publishing. This study has highlighted the benefits and importance of establishing a medical article publishing club for junior doctors. Cureus 2018-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6372248/ /pubmed/30788190 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3701 Text en Copyright © 2018, Oyibo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Oyibo, Samson O
Brij, Seema O
A Medical Article Publishing Club for Junior Doctors: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
title A Medical Article Publishing Club for Junior Doctors: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
title_full A Medical Article Publishing Club for Junior Doctors: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
title_fullStr A Medical Article Publishing Club for Junior Doctors: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Medical Article Publishing Club for Junior Doctors: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
title_short A Medical Article Publishing Club for Junior Doctors: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
title_sort medical article publishing club for junior doctors: a quantitative and qualitative analysis
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788190
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3701
work_keys_str_mv AT oyibosamsono amedicalarticlepublishingclubforjuniordoctorsaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysis
AT brijseemao amedicalarticlepublishingclubforjuniordoctorsaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysis
AT oyibosamsono medicalarticlepublishingclubforjuniordoctorsaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysis
AT brijseemao medicalarticlepublishingclubforjuniordoctorsaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysis