Cargando…

PTEN Status Assessment in the Johns Hopkins Active Surveillance Cohort

BACKGROUND: Up to half of men with Gleason score 6 (GS6) prostate cancers initially managed with active surveillance (AS) will eventually require definitive therapy, usually due to tumor grade reclassification during follow-up. We examined the association between PTEN status on biopsy and subsequent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tosoian, Jeffrey J., Guedes, Liana B., Morais, Carlos L., Mamawala, Mufaddal, Ross, Ashley E., De Marzo, Angelo M., Trock, Bruce J., Han, Misop, Carter, H. Ballentine, Lotan, Tamara L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30279579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-018-0093-2
_version_ 1783394715627945984
author Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
Guedes, Liana B.
Morais, Carlos L.
Mamawala, Mufaddal
Ross, Ashley E.
De Marzo, Angelo M.
Trock, Bruce J.
Han, Misop
Carter, H. Ballentine
Lotan, Tamara L.
author_facet Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
Guedes, Liana B.
Morais, Carlos L.
Mamawala, Mufaddal
Ross, Ashley E.
De Marzo, Angelo M.
Trock, Bruce J.
Han, Misop
Carter, H. Ballentine
Lotan, Tamara L.
author_sort Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Up to half of men with Gleason score 6 (GS6) prostate cancers initially managed with active surveillance (AS) will eventually require definitive therapy, usually due to tumor grade reclassification during follow-up. We examined the association between PTEN status on biopsy and subsequent clinicopathologic outcomes in men with GS6 cancers who enrolled in AS. METHODS: We performed a case-control study of men enrolled in the Johns Hopkins AS cohort with diagnostic biopsy tissue available for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. IHC was performed for PTEN using genetically-validated protocols for all patients. Cases included men who underwent grade reclassification to GS ≥ 3+4=7 on biopsy within two years of follow-up (i.e. early reclassification) or reclassification to GS ≥ 4+3=7 on biopsy or radical prostatectomy during follow-up (i.e. extreme reclassification). Control patients were diagnosed with GS6 cancer and monitored on AS for at least eight years without undergoing biopsy reclassification. RESULTS: Among 67 cases with adequate tissue, 31 men underwent early reclassification and 36 men underwent extreme reclassification. Cases were compared to 65 control patients with adequate tissue for assessment. On initial prostate biopsy, cases were older (median age 67 vs. 65, p=0.024) and were less likely to meet very low risk criteria (64% vs 79%, p=0.042) as compared to controls. Although not statistically significant, PTEN loss was observed in only one (2%) of 65 controls as compared to six (9%) of 67 cases (p=0.062). CONCLUSIONS: PTEN loss was rare among men with GS6 prostate cancer enrolled in AS at Johns Hopkins. Despite this, PTEN loss was more frequent among men who underwent early or extreme reclassification to higher-grade cancer as compared to controls. Additional studies in larger low-risk cohorts may better elucidate a potential role for PTEN in selecting patients for AS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6372343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63723432019-04-02 PTEN Status Assessment in the Johns Hopkins Active Surveillance Cohort Tosoian, Jeffrey J. Guedes, Liana B. Morais, Carlos L. Mamawala, Mufaddal Ross, Ashley E. De Marzo, Angelo M. Trock, Bruce J. Han, Misop Carter, H. Ballentine Lotan, Tamara L. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article BACKGROUND: Up to half of men with Gleason score 6 (GS6) prostate cancers initially managed with active surveillance (AS) will eventually require definitive therapy, usually due to tumor grade reclassification during follow-up. We examined the association between PTEN status on biopsy and subsequent clinicopathologic outcomes in men with GS6 cancers who enrolled in AS. METHODS: We performed a case-control study of men enrolled in the Johns Hopkins AS cohort with diagnostic biopsy tissue available for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. IHC was performed for PTEN using genetically-validated protocols for all patients. Cases included men who underwent grade reclassification to GS ≥ 3+4=7 on biopsy within two years of follow-up (i.e. early reclassification) or reclassification to GS ≥ 4+3=7 on biopsy or radical prostatectomy during follow-up (i.e. extreme reclassification). Control patients were diagnosed with GS6 cancer and monitored on AS for at least eight years without undergoing biopsy reclassification. RESULTS: Among 67 cases with adequate tissue, 31 men underwent early reclassification and 36 men underwent extreme reclassification. Cases were compared to 65 control patients with adequate tissue for assessment. On initial prostate biopsy, cases were older (median age 67 vs. 65, p=0.024) and were less likely to meet very low risk criteria (64% vs 79%, p=0.042) as compared to controls. Although not statistically significant, PTEN loss was observed in only one (2%) of 65 controls as compared to six (9%) of 67 cases (p=0.062). CONCLUSIONS: PTEN loss was rare among men with GS6 prostate cancer enrolled in AS at Johns Hopkins. Despite this, PTEN loss was more frequent among men who underwent early or extreme reclassification to higher-grade cancer as compared to controls. Additional studies in larger low-risk cohorts may better elucidate a potential role for PTEN in selecting patients for AS. 2018-10-02 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6372343/ /pubmed/30279579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-018-0093-2 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
Guedes, Liana B.
Morais, Carlos L.
Mamawala, Mufaddal
Ross, Ashley E.
De Marzo, Angelo M.
Trock, Bruce J.
Han, Misop
Carter, H. Ballentine
Lotan, Tamara L.
PTEN Status Assessment in the Johns Hopkins Active Surveillance Cohort
title PTEN Status Assessment in the Johns Hopkins Active Surveillance Cohort
title_full PTEN Status Assessment in the Johns Hopkins Active Surveillance Cohort
title_fullStr PTEN Status Assessment in the Johns Hopkins Active Surveillance Cohort
title_full_unstemmed PTEN Status Assessment in the Johns Hopkins Active Surveillance Cohort
title_short PTEN Status Assessment in the Johns Hopkins Active Surveillance Cohort
title_sort pten status assessment in the johns hopkins active surveillance cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30279579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-018-0093-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tosoianjeffreyj ptenstatusassessmentinthejohnshopkinsactivesurveillancecohort
AT guedeslianab ptenstatusassessmentinthejohnshopkinsactivesurveillancecohort
AT moraiscarlosl ptenstatusassessmentinthejohnshopkinsactivesurveillancecohort
AT mamawalamufaddal ptenstatusassessmentinthejohnshopkinsactivesurveillancecohort
AT rossashleye ptenstatusassessmentinthejohnshopkinsactivesurveillancecohort
AT demarzoangelom ptenstatusassessmentinthejohnshopkinsactivesurveillancecohort
AT trockbrucej ptenstatusassessmentinthejohnshopkinsactivesurveillancecohort
AT hanmisop ptenstatusassessmentinthejohnshopkinsactivesurveillancecohort
AT carterhballentine ptenstatusassessmentinthejohnshopkinsactivesurveillancecohort
AT lotantamaral ptenstatusassessmentinthejohnshopkinsactivesurveillancecohort