Cargando…

Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES: Osteoporosis is a rapidly rising cause of concern for elderly patients. Various classes of drugs are available in the market. Bisphosphonates are considered as a first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment. Denosumab is an antiresorptive agent which is a RANK ligand inhibitor. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benjamin, Biju, Benjamin, Mridula Ambwani, Swe, Myint, Sugathan, Sandheep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Osteoporosis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2016.03.003
_version_ 1783394813076307968
author Benjamin, Biju
Benjamin, Mridula Ambwani
Swe, Myint
Sugathan, Sandheep
author_facet Benjamin, Biju
Benjamin, Mridula Ambwani
Swe, Myint
Sugathan, Sandheep
author_sort Benjamin, Biju
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Osteoporosis is a rapidly rising cause of concern for elderly patients. Various classes of drugs are available in the market. Bisphosphonates are considered as a first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment. Denosumab is an antiresorptive agent which is a RANK ligand inhibitor. There is a scarcity of comparison between these two classes of drugs. The aim of this study is to compare efficacy of Bisphosphonates and Denosumab in various parameters. METHODS: Literature search was done for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bisphosphonates with denosumab. RCTs with a treatment period of at least one year with a baseline bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) and follow up values at one year were included in the study. All included studies were also analysed for complications. The study has also been registered in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. RESULTS: A total of five RCTs were identified providing data on 3751 participants. In all five studies, the BMD changes at both hip and spine were statistically significant in favour of denosumab. Result was similar in three studies that studied BMD changes at the wrist. Denosumab also produced significant reduction in BTM as early as one month, but at one year there was no difference compared to the bisphosphonates. There was no statistically significant differences in the complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Though both bisphosphonates and denosumab were effective with similar side effects, the latter was statistically superior in increasing the BMD and reducing the BTM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6372735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Society of Osteoporosis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63727352019-02-15 Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis Benjamin, Biju Benjamin, Mridula Ambwani Swe, Myint Sugathan, Sandheep Osteoporos Sarcopenia Review Article OBJECTIVES: Osteoporosis is a rapidly rising cause of concern for elderly patients. Various classes of drugs are available in the market. Bisphosphonates are considered as a first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment. Denosumab is an antiresorptive agent which is a RANK ligand inhibitor. There is a scarcity of comparison between these two classes of drugs. The aim of this study is to compare efficacy of Bisphosphonates and Denosumab in various parameters. METHODS: Literature search was done for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bisphosphonates with denosumab. RCTs with a treatment period of at least one year with a baseline bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) and follow up values at one year were included in the study. All included studies were also analysed for complications. The study has also been registered in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. RESULTS: A total of five RCTs were identified providing data on 3751 participants. In all five studies, the BMD changes at both hip and spine were statistically significant in favour of denosumab. Result was similar in three studies that studied BMD changes at the wrist. Denosumab also produced significant reduction in BTM as early as one month, but at one year there was no difference compared to the bisphosphonates. There was no statistically significant differences in the complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Though both bisphosphonates and denosumab were effective with similar side effects, the latter was statistically superior in increasing the BMD and reducing the BTM. Korean Society of Osteoporosis 2016-06 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6372735/ /pubmed/30775470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2016.03.003 Text en © 2016 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Benjamin, Biju
Benjamin, Mridula Ambwani
Swe, Myint
Sugathan, Sandheep
Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis
title Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis
title_full Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis
title_fullStr Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis
title_short Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis
title_sort review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2016.03.003
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminbiju reviewonthecomparisonofeffectivenessbetweendenosumabandbisphosphonatesinpostmenopausalosteoporosis
AT benjaminmridulaambwani reviewonthecomparisonofeffectivenessbetweendenosumabandbisphosphonatesinpostmenopausalosteoporosis
AT swemyint reviewonthecomparisonofeffectivenessbetweendenosumabandbisphosphonatesinpostmenopausalosteoporosis
AT sugathansandheep reviewonthecomparisonofeffectivenessbetweendenosumabandbisphosphonatesinpostmenopausalosteoporosis