Cargando…
Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis
OBJECTIVES: Osteoporosis is a rapidly rising cause of concern for elderly patients. Various classes of drugs are available in the market. Bisphosphonates are considered as a first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment. Denosumab is an antiresorptive agent which is a RANK ligand inhibitor. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Osteoporosis
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2016.03.003 |
_version_ | 1783394813076307968 |
---|---|
author | Benjamin, Biju Benjamin, Mridula Ambwani Swe, Myint Sugathan, Sandheep |
author_facet | Benjamin, Biju Benjamin, Mridula Ambwani Swe, Myint Sugathan, Sandheep |
author_sort | Benjamin, Biju |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Osteoporosis is a rapidly rising cause of concern for elderly patients. Various classes of drugs are available in the market. Bisphosphonates are considered as a first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment. Denosumab is an antiresorptive agent which is a RANK ligand inhibitor. There is a scarcity of comparison between these two classes of drugs. The aim of this study is to compare efficacy of Bisphosphonates and Denosumab in various parameters. METHODS: Literature search was done for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bisphosphonates with denosumab. RCTs with a treatment period of at least one year with a baseline bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) and follow up values at one year were included in the study. All included studies were also analysed for complications. The study has also been registered in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. RESULTS: A total of five RCTs were identified providing data on 3751 participants. In all five studies, the BMD changes at both hip and spine were statistically significant in favour of denosumab. Result was similar in three studies that studied BMD changes at the wrist. Denosumab also produced significant reduction in BTM as early as one month, but at one year there was no difference compared to the bisphosphonates. There was no statistically significant differences in the complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Though both bisphosphonates and denosumab were effective with similar side effects, the latter was statistically superior in increasing the BMD and reducing the BTM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6372735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Korean Society of Osteoporosis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63727352019-02-15 Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis Benjamin, Biju Benjamin, Mridula Ambwani Swe, Myint Sugathan, Sandheep Osteoporos Sarcopenia Review Article OBJECTIVES: Osteoporosis is a rapidly rising cause of concern for elderly patients. Various classes of drugs are available in the market. Bisphosphonates are considered as a first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment. Denosumab is an antiresorptive agent which is a RANK ligand inhibitor. There is a scarcity of comparison between these two classes of drugs. The aim of this study is to compare efficacy of Bisphosphonates and Denosumab in various parameters. METHODS: Literature search was done for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bisphosphonates with denosumab. RCTs with a treatment period of at least one year with a baseline bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) and follow up values at one year were included in the study. All included studies were also analysed for complications. The study has also been registered in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. RESULTS: A total of five RCTs were identified providing data on 3751 participants. In all five studies, the BMD changes at both hip and spine were statistically significant in favour of denosumab. Result was similar in three studies that studied BMD changes at the wrist. Denosumab also produced significant reduction in BTM as early as one month, but at one year there was no difference compared to the bisphosphonates. There was no statistically significant differences in the complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Though both bisphosphonates and denosumab were effective with similar side effects, the latter was statistically superior in increasing the BMD and reducing the BTM. Korean Society of Osteoporosis 2016-06 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6372735/ /pubmed/30775470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2016.03.003 Text en © 2016 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Benjamin, Biju Benjamin, Mridula Ambwani Swe, Myint Sugathan, Sandheep Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis |
title | Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis |
title_full | Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis |
title_fullStr | Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis |
title_short | Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis |
title_sort | review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2016.03.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminbiju reviewonthecomparisonofeffectivenessbetweendenosumabandbisphosphonatesinpostmenopausalosteoporosis AT benjaminmridulaambwani reviewonthecomparisonofeffectivenessbetweendenosumabandbisphosphonatesinpostmenopausalosteoporosis AT swemyint reviewonthecomparisonofeffectivenessbetweendenosumabandbisphosphonatesinpostmenopausalosteoporosis AT sugathansandheep reviewonthecomparisonofeffectivenessbetweendenosumabandbisphosphonatesinpostmenopausalosteoporosis |