Cargando…

Clinical features of atypical femur fracture

OBJECTIVES: We aim to elucidate the clinical outcomes of bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fracture and the clinical results depending on the bisphosphonate therapy period. METHODS: Twenty cases involving 15 patients who had been diagnosed with atypical femoral facture between 2004 and 2014...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Joong Sup, Kim, Nak Chul, Moon, Kyoung Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Osteoporosis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2016.08.001
_version_ 1783394816182190080
author Shin, Joong Sup
Kim, Nak Chul
Moon, Kyoung Ho
author_facet Shin, Joong Sup
Kim, Nak Chul
Moon, Kyoung Ho
author_sort Shin, Joong Sup
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We aim to elucidate the clinical outcomes of bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fracture and the clinical results depending on the bisphosphonate therapy period. METHODS: Twenty cases involving 15 patients who had been diagnosed with atypical femoral facture between 2004 and 2014 and who had been followed up for at least 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. The control group was composed of 15 typical femoral facture patients. We used plain radiography and physical examinations to determine the period of time required for fracture healing as well as complication occurrence. We investigated the bisphosphonate administration status and duration and the names of its components, bilateral fracture occurrence status, the period of time required for bone union, and reoperation or bone graft status due to nonunion. RESULTS: Revision surgery involving a bone graft was performed due to nonunion in 1 out of 15 cases. Except in one revision case, the duration of the union was 11.9 months on average in 14 cases of atypical fracture patients, and 4.3 months on average in the control group. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The bisphosphonate administration duration was positively correlated with the union period (p < 0.05). In contrast, there was no statistically significant correlation between the bisphosphonate administration duration and the incidence of bilateral atypical fractures (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Atypical femoral fractures required more time for bone union than typical ones and prolonged bisphosphonate administration led to a longer period of time required for bone union.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6372747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Society of Osteoporosis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63727472019-02-15 Clinical features of atypical femur fracture Shin, Joong Sup Kim, Nak Chul Moon, Kyoung Ho Osteoporos Sarcopenia Original Article OBJECTIVES: We aim to elucidate the clinical outcomes of bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fracture and the clinical results depending on the bisphosphonate therapy period. METHODS: Twenty cases involving 15 patients who had been diagnosed with atypical femoral facture between 2004 and 2014 and who had been followed up for at least 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. The control group was composed of 15 typical femoral facture patients. We used plain radiography and physical examinations to determine the period of time required for fracture healing as well as complication occurrence. We investigated the bisphosphonate administration status and duration and the names of its components, bilateral fracture occurrence status, the period of time required for bone union, and reoperation or bone graft status due to nonunion. RESULTS: Revision surgery involving a bone graft was performed due to nonunion in 1 out of 15 cases. Except in one revision case, the duration of the union was 11.9 months on average in 14 cases of atypical fracture patients, and 4.3 months on average in the control group. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The bisphosphonate administration duration was positively correlated with the union period (p < 0.05). In contrast, there was no statistically significant correlation between the bisphosphonate administration duration and the incidence of bilateral atypical fractures (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Atypical femoral fractures required more time for bone union than typical ones and prolonged bisphosphonate administration led to a longer period of time required for bone union. Korean Society of Osteoporosis 2016-12 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6372747/ /pubmed/30775493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2016.08.001 Text en © 2016 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Shin, Joong Sup
Kim, Nak Chul
Moon, Kyoung Ho
Clinical features of atypical femur fracture
title Clinical features of atypical femur fracture
title_full Clinical features of atypical femur fracture
title_fullStr Clinical features of atypical femur fracture
title_full_unstemmed Clinical features of atypical femur fracture
title_short Clinical features of atypical femur fracture
title_sort clinical features of atypical femur fracture
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2016.08.001
work_keys_str_mv AT shinjoongsup clinicalfeaturesofatypicalfemurfracture
AT kimnakchul clinicalfeaturesofatypicalfemurfracture
AT moonkyoungho clinicalfeaturesofatypicalfemurfracture