Cargando…

Antegrade stent placement in laparoscopic upper urinary tract surgery. Is there an easy way?

INTRODUCTION: Antegrade placement of double J stents in laparoscopy is considered a challenging and time-consuming process due to limitations regarding stent flexibility. AIM: To describe the method we used to facilitate the antegrade placement of intracorporeal stents in laparoscopic upper urinary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gökçen, Kaan, Gökçe, Gökhan, Kordan, Yakup, Kıraç, Emre, Dündar, Gökçe, Gültekin, Emin Yener
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766636
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2018.77260
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Antegrade placement of double J stents in laparoscopy is considered a challenging and time-consuming process due to limitations regarding stent flexibility. AIM: To describe the method we used to facilitate the antegrade placement of intracorporeal stents in laparoscopic upper urinary tract (LUUT) surgery and report its results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data obtained from 42 consecutive patients who had stents placed antegradely in laparoscopic pyeloplasty or in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for middle-upper ureteral stones were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 30.1 ±18.6 (10 months–68 years) and 13 patients were in the paediatric age group. All patients in the paediatric age group underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty. RESULTS: The mean operative time for the 42 total cases, of which 32 underwent laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty and 10 laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, was 126.9 ±33.5 (70–200) min and the intraoperative stent placement time was calculated as 2.61 ±0.8 (1.5–5) min. The patients, who had a mean hospitalization time of 2.8 ±0.9 (2–5) months, required no additional interventions and no complications were encountered intraoperatively. In the patient series that had a mean follow-up time of 17.4 ±11.3 (1–35), it was determined only in 1 patient that the distal tip of the stent had not been in the bladder. CONCLUSIONS: The described modified antegrade stent placement technique is a practical method that is safe for all LUUT cases in both paediatric and adult age groups and it has been shown to produce successful outcomes and to be time-saving.