Cargando…
Patent Foramen Ovale: Story Closed?
The optimal treatment strategy for secondary prevention in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been a matter of controversy for decades. After three randomized trials failed to show a benefit of closure with an excess of complications in the interventional arm, two la...
Autores principales: | Köhrmann, Martin, Schellinger, Peter D., Tsivgoulis, Georgios, Steiner, Thorsten |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Stroke Society
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732440 http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2018.03097 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cryptogenic Stroke: To Close a Patent Foramen Ovale or Not to
Close?
por: Kottoor, Santhosh J, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Review and Critical Appraisal
por: Schellinger, Peter D., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Associated Bleeding and Its Antidotes
por: Steiner, Thorsten, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Opportunity Closed in Old Patients?
por: Kim, Jong S., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Patent foramen ovale closure
por: Amin, Zahid
Publicado: (2010)