Cargando…
A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is preventable if effective screening measures are in place. Pap-smear is the commonest technique used for early screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer. However, the manual analysis of the pap-smears is error prone due to human mistake, moreover, the process is tediou...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0634-5 |
_version_ | 1783394894501380096 |
---|---|
author | William, Wasswa Ware, Andrew Basaza-Ejiri, Annabella Habinka Obungoloch, Johnes |
author_facet | William, Wasswa Ware, Andrew Basaza-Ejiri, Annabella Habinka Obungoloch, Johnes |
author_sort | William, Wasswa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is preventable if effective screening measures are in place. Pap-smear is the commonest technique used for early screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer. However, the manual analysis of the pap-smears is error prone due to human mistake, moreover, the process is tedious and time-consuming. Hence, it is beneficial to develop a computer-assisted diagnosis tool to make the pap-smear test more accurate and reliable. This paper describes the development of a tool for automated diagnosis and classification of cervical cancer from pap-smear images. METHOD: Scene segmentation was achieved through a Trainable Weka Segmentation classifier and a sequential elimination approach was used for debris rejection. Feature selection was achieved using simulated annealing integrated with a wrapper filter, while classification was achieved using a fuzzy C-means algorithm. RESULTS: The evaluation of the classifier was carried out on three different datasets (single cell images, multiple cell images and pap-smear slide images from a pathology lab). Overall classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of ‘98.88%, 99.28% and 97.47%’, ‘97.64%, 98.08% and 97.16%’ and ‘95.00%, 100% and 90.00%’ were obtained for each dataset, respectively. The higher accuracy and sensitivity of the classifier was attributed to the robustness of the feature selection method that accurately selected cell features that improved the classification performance and the number of clusters used during defuzzification and classification. Results show that the method outperforms many of the existing algorithms in sensitivity (99.28%), specificity (97.47%), and accuracy (98.88%) when applied to the Herlev benchmark pap-smear dataset. False negative rate, false positive rate and classification error of 0.00%, 10.00% and 5.00%, respectively were obtained when applied to pap-smear slides from a pathology lab. CONCLUSIONS: The major contribution of this tool in a cervical cancer screening workflow is that it reduces on the time required by the cytotechnician to screen very many pap-smears by eliminating the obvious normal ones, hence more time can be put on the suspicious slides. The proposed system has the capability of analyzing a full pap-smear slide within 3 min as opposed to the 5–10 min per slide in the manual analysis. The tool presented in this paper is applicable to many pap-smear analysis systems but is particularly pertinent to low-cost systems that should be of significant benefit to developing economies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6373062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63730622019-02-25 A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images William, Wasswa Ware, Andrew Basaza-Ejiri, Annabella Habinka Obungoloch, Johnes Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is preventable if effective screening measures are in place. Pap-smear is the commonest technique used for early screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer. However, the manual analysis of the pap-smears is error prone due to human mistake, moreover, the process is tedious and time-consuming. Hence, it is beneficial to develop a computer-assisted diagnosis tool to make the pap-smear test more accurate and reliable. This paper describes the development of a tool for automated diagnosis and classification of cervical cancer from pap-smear images. METHOD: Scene segmentation was achieved through a Trainable Weka Segmentation classifier and a sequential elimination approach was used for debris rejection. Feature selection was achieved using simulated annealing integrated with a wrapper filter, while classification was achieved using a fuzzy C-means algorithm. RESULTS: The evaluation of the classifier was carried out on three different datasets (single cell images, multiple cell images and pap-smear slide images from a pathology lab). Overall classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of ‘98.88%, 99.28% and 97.47%’, ‘97.64%, 98.08% and 97.16%’ and ‘95.00%, 100% and 90.00%’ were obtained for each dataset, respectively. The higher accuracy and sensitivity of the classifier was attributed to the robustness of the feature selection method that accurately selected cell features that improved the classification performance and the number of clusters used during defuzzification and classification. Results show that the method outperforms many of the existing algorithms in sensitivity (99.28%), specificity (97.47%), and accuracy (98.88%) when applied to the Herlev benchmark pap-smear dataset. False negative rate, false positive rate and classification error of 0.00%, 10.00% and 5.00%, respectively were obtained when applied to pap-smear slides from a pathology lab. CONCLUSIONS: The major contribution of this tool in a cervical cancer screening workflow is that it reduces on the time required by the cytotechnician to screen very many pap-smears by eliminating the obvious normal ones, hence more time can be put on the suspicious slides. The proposed system has the capability of analyzing a full pap-smear slide within 3 min as opposed to the 5–10 min per slide in the manual analysis. The tool presented in this paper is applicable to many pap-smear analysis systems but is particularly pertinent to low-cost systems that should be of significant benefit to developing economies. BioMed Central 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6373062/ /pubmed/30755214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0634-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research William, Wasswa Ware, Andrew Basaza-Ejiri, Annabella Habinka Obungoloch, Johnes A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images |
title | A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images |
title_full | A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images |
title_fullStr | A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images |
title_full_unstemmed | A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images |
title_short | A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images |
title_sort | pap-smear analysis tool (pat) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0634-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamwasswa apapsmearanalysistoolpatfordetectionofcervicalcancerfrompapsmearimages AT wareandrew apapsmearanalysistoolpatfordetectionofcervicalcancerfrompapsmearimages AT basazaejiriannabellahabinka apapsmearanalysistoolpatfordetectionofcervicalcancerfrompapsmearimages AT obungolochjohnes apapsmearanalysistoolpatfordetectionofcervicalcancerfrompapsmearimages AT williamwasswa papsmearanalysistoolpatfordetectionofcervicalcancerfrompapsmearimages AT wareandrew papsmearanalysistoolpatfordetectionofcervicalcancerfrompapsmearimages AT basazaejiriannabellahabinka papsmearanalysistoolpatfordetectionofcervicalcancerfrompapsmearimages AT obungolochjohnes papsmearanalysistoolpatfordetectionofcervicalcancerfrompapsmearimages |