Cargando…
Rapid molecular detection of macrolide resistance
BACKGROUND: Emerging antimicrobial resistance is a significant threat to human health. However, methods for rapidly diagnosing antimicrobial resistance generally require multi-day culture-based assays. Macrolide efflux gene A, mef(A), provides resistance against erythromycin and azithromycin and is...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3762-4 |
_version_ | 1783394912639647744 |
---|---|
author | Nelson, Megan M. Waldron, Christopher L. Bracht, John R. |
author_facet | Nelson, Megan M. Waldron, Christopher L. Bracht, John R. |
author_sort | Nelson, Megan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Emerging antimicrobial resistance is a significant threat to human health. However, methods for rapidly diagnosing antimicrobial resistance generally require multi-day culture-based assays. Macrolide efflux gene A, mef(A), provides resistance against erythromycin and azithromycin and is known to be laterally transferred among a wide range of bacterial species. METHODS: We use Recombinase Polymerase Assay (RPA) to detect the antimicrobial resistance gene mef(A) from raw lysates without nucleic acid purification. To validate these results we performed broth dilution assays to assess antimicrobial resistance to erythromycin and ampicillin (a negative control). RESULTS: We validate the detection of mef(A) in raw lysates of Streptococcus pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, S. salivarius, and Enterococcus faecium bacterial lysates within 7–10 min of assay time. We show that detection of mef(A) accurately predicts real antimicrobial resistance assessed by traditional culture methods, and that the assay is robust to high levels of spiked-in non-specific nucleic acid contaminant. The assay was unaffected by single-nucleotide polymorphisms within divergent mef(A) gene sequences, strengthening its utility as a robust diagnostic tool. CONCLUSIONS: This finding opens the door to implementation of rapid genomic diagnostics in a clinical setting, while providing researchers a rapid, cost-effective tool to track antibiotic resistance in both pathogens and commensal strains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6373131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63731312019-02-25 Rapid molecular detection of macrolide resistance Nelson, Megan M. Waldron, Christopher L. Bracht, John R. BMC Infect Dis Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Emerging antimicrobial resistance is a significant threat to human health. However, methods for rapidly diagnosing antimicrobial resistance generally require multi-day culture-based assays. Macrolide efflux gene A, mef(A), provides resistance against erythromycin and azithromycin and is known to be laterally transferred among a wide range of bacterial species. METHODS: We use Recombinase Polymerase Assay (RPA) to detect the antimicrobial resistance gene mef(A) from raw lysates without nucleic acid purification. To validate these results we performed broth dilution assays to assess antimicrobial resistance to erythromycin and ampicillin (a negative control). RESULTS: We validate the detection of mef(A) in raw lysates of Streptococcus pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, S. salivarius, and Enterococcus faecium bacterial lysates within 7–10 min of assay time. We show that detection of mef(A) accurately predicts real antimicrobial resistance assessed by traditional culture methods, and that the assay is robust to high levels of spiked-in non-specific nucleic acid contaminant. The assay was unaffected by single-nucleotide polymorphisms within divergent mef(A) gene sequences, strengthening its utility as a robust diagnostic tool. CONCLUSIONS: This finding opens the door to implementation of rapid genomic diagnostics in a clinical setting, while providing researchers a rapid, cost-effective tool to track antibiotic resistance in both pathogens and commensal strains. BioMed Central 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6373131/ /pubmed/30755177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3762-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Nelson, Megan M. Waldron, Christopher L. Bracht, John R. Rapid molecular detection of macrolide resistance |
title | Rapid molecular detection of macrolide resistance |
title_full | Rapid molecular detection of macrolide resistance |
title_fullStr | Rapid molecular detection of macrolide resistance |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid molecular detection of macrolide resistance |
title_short | Rapid molecular detection of macrolide resistance |
title_sort | rapid molecular detection of macrolide resistance |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3762-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nelsonmeganm rapidmoleculardetectionofmacrolideresistance AT waldronchristopherl rapidmoleculardetectionofmacrolideresistance AT brachtjohnr rapidmoleculardetectionofmacrolideresistance |