Cargando…
Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia
BACKGROUND: Workplace health programs (WHPs) may improve adult health but very little evidence exists on multi-level WHPs implemented at-scale and so the relationship between program implementation factors and outcomes of WHPs are poorly understood. This study evaluated Get Healthy at Work (GHaW), a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6493-y |
_version_ | 1783394915787472896 |
---|---|
author | Crane, Melanie Bohn-Goldbaum, Erika Lloyd, Beverley Rissel, Chris Bauman, Adrian Indig, Devon Khanal, Santosh Grunseit, Anne |
author_facet | Crane, Melanie Bohn-Goldbaum, Erika Lloyd, Beverley Rissel, Chris Bauman, Adrian Indig, Devon Khanal, Santosh Grunseit, Anne |
author_sort | Crane, Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Workplace health programs (WHPs) may improve adult health but very little evidence exists on multi-level WHPs implemented at-scale and so the relationship between program implementation factors and outcomes of WHPs are poorly understood. This study evaluated Get Healthy at Work (GHaW), a state-wide government-funded WHP in Australia. METHODS: A mixed-method design included a longitudinal quasi-experimental survey of businesses registered with GHaW and a comparison group of businesses surveyed over a 12-month period. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with key contacts and employees of selected intervention group businesses and the service providers of the program were conducted to assess program adoption and adaptation. RESULTS: Positive business-level changes in workplace culture were observed over time among GHaW businesses compared with the control group. Multilevel regression modelling revealed perceptions that employees were generally healthy (p = 0.045 timeXgroup effect) and that the workplace promoted healthy behaviours (p = 0.004 timeXgroup effect) improved significantly while the control group reported no change in work culture perceptions. Changes in perceptions about work productivity were not observed; however only one third of businesses registered for the program had adopted GHaW during the evaluation period. Qualitative results revealed a number of factors contributing to program adoption: which depended on program delivery (e.g., logistics, technology and communication channels), design features of the program, and organisational factors (primarily business size and previous experience of WHPs). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of program factors is important to improve program delivery and uptake and to ensure greater scalability. GHaW has the potential to improve workplace health culture, which may lead to better health promoting work environments. These results imply that government can play a central role in enabling prioritisation and incentivising health promotion in the workplace. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6493-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6373144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63731442019-02-25 Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia Crane, Melanie Bohn-Goldbaum, Erika Lloyd, Beverley Rissel, Chris Bauman, Adrian Indig, Devon Khanal, Santosh Grunseit, Anne BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Workplace health programs (WHPs) may improve adult health but very little evidence exists on multi-level WHPs implemented at-scale and so the relationship between program implementation factors and outcomes of WHPs are poorly understood. This study evaluated Get Healthy at Work (GHaW), a state-wide government-funded WHP in Australia. METHODS: A mixed-method design included a longitudinal quasi-experimental survey of businesses registered with GHaW and a comparison group of businesses surveyed over a 12-month period. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with key contacts and employees of selected intervention group businesses and the service providers of the program were conducted to assess program adoption and adaptation. RESULTS: Positive business-level changes in workplace culture were observed over time among GHaW businesses compared with the control group. Multilevel regression modelling revealed perceptions that employees were generally healthy (p = 0.045 timeXgroup effect) and that the workplace promoted healthy behaviours (p = 0.004 timeXgroup effect) improved significantly while the control group reported no change in work culture perceptions. Changes in perceptions about work productivity were not observed; however only one third of businesses registered for the program had adopted GHaW during the evaluation period. Qualitative results revealed a number of factors contributing to program adoption: which depended on program delivery (e.g., logistics, technology and communication channels), design features of the program, and organisational factors (primarily business size and previous experience of WHPs). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of program factors is important to improve program delivery and uptake and to ensure greater scalability. GHaW has the potential to improve workplace health culture, which may lead to better health promoting work environments. These results imply that government can play a central role in enabling prioritisation and incentivising health promotion in the workplace. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6493-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6373144/ /pubmed/30760237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6493-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Crane, Melanie Bohn-Goldbaum, Erika Lloyd, Beverley Rissel, Chris Bauman, Adrian Indig, Devon Khanal, Santosh Grunseit, Anne Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia |
title | Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia |
title_full | Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia |
title_short | Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia |
title_sort | evaluation of get healthy at work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in australia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6493-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cranemelanie evaluationofgethealthyatworkastatewideworkplacehealthpromotionprograminaustralia AT bohngoldbaumerika evaluationofgethealthyatworkastatewideworkplacehealthpromotionprograminaustralia AT lloydbeverley evaluationofgethealthyatworkastatewideworkplacehealthpromotionprograminaustralia AT risselchris evaluationofgethealthyatworkastatewideworkplacehealthpromotionprograminaustralia AT baumanadrian evaluationofgethealthyatworkastatewideworkplacehealthpromotionprograminaustralia AT indigdevon evaluationofgethealthyatworkastatewideworkplacehealthpromotionprograminaustralia AT khanalsantosh evaluationofgethealthyatworkastatewideworkplacehealthpromotionprograminaustralia AT grunseitanne evaluationofgethealthyatworkastatewideworkplacehealthpromotionprograminaustralia |