Cargando…
Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality
The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5 |
_version_ | 1783394953201713152 |
---|---|
author | Tinga, Angelica M. Nyklíček, Ivan Jansen, Michel P. de Back, Tycho T. Louwerse, Max M. |
author_facet | Tinga, Angelica M. Nyklíček, Ivan Jansen, Michel P. de Back, Tycho T. Louwerse, Max M. |
author_sort | Tinga, Angelica M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. Three conditions were used: (a) a respiratory biofeedback condition, in which visual feedback was paired to breathing; (b) a control feedback placebo condition, in which visual feedback was not paired to breathing; and (c) a control no-feedback condition, in which no visual feedback was used. Subjective and objective arousal decreased during meditation after stress in all conditions, demonstrating recovery after stress during meditation in virtual reality. However, the reduction in arousal (on all outcome measures combined and heart rate specifically) was largest in the control feedback placebo condition, in which no biofeedback was used, indicating that respiratory biofeedback had no additional value in reducing arousal. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of including a control feedback placebo condition in order to establish the exact additional value of biofeedback and offer insights in applying cost-effective virtual reality meditation training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6373281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63732812019-03-01 Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality Tinga, Angelica M. Nyklíček, Ivan Jansen, Michel P. de Back, Tycho T. Louwerse, Max M. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Article The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. Three conditions were used: (a) a respiratory biofeedback condition, in which visual feedback was paired to breathing; (b) a control feedback placebo condition, in which visual feedback was not paired to breathing; and (c) a control no-feedback condition, in which no visual feedback was used. Subjective and objective arousal decreased during meditation after stress in all conditions, demonstrating recovery after stress during meditation in virtual reality. However, the reduction in arousal (on all outcome measures combined and heart rate specifically) was largest in the control feedback placebo condition, in which no biofeedback was used, indicating that respiratory biofeedback had no additional value in reducing arousal. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of including a control feedback placebo condition in order to establish the exact additional value of biofeedback and offer insights in applying cost-effective virtual reality meditation training. Springer US 2018-10-30 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6373281/ /pubmed/30377895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Tinga, Angelica M. Nyklíček, Ivan Jansen, Michel P. de Back, Tycho T. Louwerse, Max M. Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality |
title | Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality |
title_full | Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality |
title_fullStr | Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality |
title_full_unstemmed | Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality |
title_short | Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality |
title_sort | respiratory biofeedback does not facilitate lowering arousal in meditation through virtual reality |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tingaangelicam respiratorybiofeedbackdoesnotfacilitateloweringarousalinmeditationthroughvirtualreality AT nyklicekivan respiratorybiofeedbackdoesnotfacilitateloweringarousalinmeditationthroughvirtualreality AT jansenmichelp respiratorybiofeedbackdoesnotfacilitateloweringarousalinmeditationthroughvirtualreality AT debacktychot respiratorybiofeedbackdoesnotfacilitateloweringarousalinmeditationthroughvirtualreality AT louwersemaxm respiratorybiofeedbackdoesnotfacilitateloweringarousalinmeditationthroughvirtualreality |