Cargando…

Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality

The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tinga, Angelica M., Nyklíček, Ivan, Jansen, Michel P., de Back, Tycho T., Louwerse, Max M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5
_version_ 1783394953201713152
author Tinga, Angelica M.
Nyklíček, Ivan
Jansen, Michel P.
de Back, Tycho T.
Louwerse, Max M.
author_facet Tinga, Angelica M.
Nyklíček, Ivan
Jansen, Michel P.
de Back, Tycho T.
Louwerse, Max M.
author_sort Tinga, Angelica M.
collection PubMed
description The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. Three conditions were used: (a) a respiratory biofeedback condition, in which visual feedback was paired to breathing; (b) a control feedback placebo condition, in which visual feedback was not paired to breathing; and (c) a control no-feedback condition, in which no visual feedback was used. Subjective and objective arousal decreased during meditation after stress in all conditions, demonstrating recovery after stress during meditation in virtual reality. However, the reduction in arousal (on all outcome measures combined and heart rate specifically) was largest in the control feedback placebo condition, in which no biofeedback was used, indicating that respiratory biofeedback had no additional value in reducing arousal. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of including a control feedback placebo condition in order to establish the exact additional value of biofeedback and offer insights in applying cost-effective virtual reality meditation training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6373281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63732812019-03-01 Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality Tinga, Angelica M. Nyklíček, Ivan Jansen, Michel P. de Back, Tycho T. Louwerse, Max M. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Article The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. Three conditions were used: (a) a respiratory biofeedback condition, in which visual feedback was paired to breathing; (b) a control feedback placebo condition, in which visual feedback was not paired to breathing; and (c) a control no-feedback condition, in which no visual feedback was used. Subjective and objective arousal decreased during meditation after stress in all conditions, demonstrating recovery after stress during meditation in virtual reality. However, the reduction in arousal (on all outcome measures combined and heart rate specifically) was largest in the control feedback placebo condition, in which no biofeedback was used, indicating that respiratory biofeedback had no additional value in reducing arousal. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of including a control feedback placebo condition in order to establish the exact additional value of biofeedback and offer insights in applying cost-effective virtual reality meditation training. Springer US 2018-10-30 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6373281/ /pubmed/30377895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Tinga, Angelica M.
Nyklíček, Ivan
Jansen, Michel P.
de Back, Tycho T.
Louwerse, Max M.
Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality
title Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality
title_full Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality
title_fullStr Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality
title_full_unstemmed Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality
title_short Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality
title_sort respiratory biofeedback does not facilitate lowering arousal in meditation through virtual reality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tingaangelicam respiratorybiofeedbackdoesnotfacilitateloweringarousalinmeditationthroughvirtualreality
AT nyklicekivan respiratorybiofeedbackdoesnotfacilitateloweringarousalinmeditationthroughvirtualreality
AT jansenmichelp respiratorybiofeedbackdoesnotfacilitateloweringarousalinmeditationthroughvirtualreality
AT debacktychot respiratorybiofeedbackdoesnotfacilitateloweringarousalinmeditationthroughvirtualreality
AT louwersemaxm respiratorybiofeedbackdoesnotfacilitateloweringarousalinmeditationthroughvirtualreality