Cargando…
CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome
Current echocardiographic data reporting the impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) on outcome in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are conflicting. Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, this study aimed to assess the impact of MR severity o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30182320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1441-y |
_version_ | 1783394958946861056 |
---|---|
author | Chew, Pei G. Dobson, Laura E. Garg, Pankaj Fairbairn, Timothy A. Musa, Tarique A. Uddin, Akhlaque Swoboda, Peter P. Foley, James R. Fent, Graham J. Brown, Louise A. E. Onciul, Sebastian Plein, Sven Blackman, Daniel J. Greenwood, John P. |
author_facet | Chew, Pei G. Dobson, Laura E. Garg, Pankaj Fairbairn, Timothy A. Musa, Tarique A. Uddin, Akhlaque Swoboda, Peter P. Foley, James R. Fent, Graham J. Brown, Louise A. E. Onciul, Sebastian Plein, Sven Blackman, Daniel J. Greenwood, John P. |
author_sort | Chew, Pei G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current echocardiographic data reporting the impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) on outcome in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are conflicting. Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, this study aimed to assess the impact of MR severity on cardiac reverse remodeling and patient outcome. 85 patients undergoing TAVR with CMR pre- and 6 m post-TAVR were evaluated. The CMR protocol included cines for left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes, flow assessment, and myocardial scar assessment by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Patients were dichotomised according to CMR severity of MR fraction at baseline (‘non-significant’ vs ‘significant’) and followed up for a median duration of 3 years. Forty-two (49%) patients had ‘significant MR’ at baseline; they had similar LV and RV size and function compared to the ‘non-significant MR’ group but had greater LV mass at baseline. In those with significant MR at baseline, 77% (n = 32) had a reduction in MR post-TAVR, moving them into the ‘non-significant’ category at 6-months, with an overall reduction in MR fraction from 34 to 17% (p < 0.001). Improvement in MR was not associated with more favourable cardiac reverse remodeling when compared with the ‘non-improvers’. Significant MR at baseline was not associated with increased mortality at follow-up. Significant MR is common in patients undergoing TAVR and improves in the majority post-procedure. Improvement in MR was not associated with more favourable LV reverse remodeling and baseline MR severity was not associated with mortality. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10554-018-1441-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6373302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63733022019-03-01 CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome Chew, Pei G. Dobson, Laura E. Garg, Pankaj Fairbairn, Timothy A. Musa, Tarique A. Uddin, Akhlaque Swoboda, Peter P. Foley, James R. Fent, Graham J. Brown, Louise A. E. Onciul, Sebastian Plein, Sven Blackman, Daniel J. Greenwood, John P. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Current echocardiographic data reporting the impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) on outcome in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are conflicting. Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, this study aimed to assess the impact of MR severity on cardiac reverse remodeling and patient outcome. 85 patients undergoing TAVR with CMR pre- and 6 m post-TAVR were evaluated. The CMR protocol included cines for left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes, flow assessment, and myocardial scar assessment by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Patients were dichotomised according to CMR severity of MR fraction at baseline (‘non-significant’ vs ‘significant’) and followed up for a median duration of 3 years. Forty-two (49%) patients had ‘significant MR’ at baseline; they had similar LV and RV size and function compared to the ‘non-significant MR’ group but had greater LV mass at baseline. In those with significant MR at baseline, 77% (n = 32) had a reduction in MR post-TAVR, moving them into the ‘non-significant’ category at 6-months, with an overall reduction in MR fraction from 34 to 17% (p < 0.001). Improvement in MR was not associated with more favourable cardiac reverse remodeling when compared with the ‘non-improvers’. Significant MR at baseline was not associated with increased mortality at follow-up. Significant MR is common in patients undergoing TAVR and improves in the majority post-procedure. Improvement in MR was not associated with more favourable LV reverse remodeling and baseline MR severity was not associated with mortality. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10554-018-1441-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2018-09-04 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6373302/ /pubmed/30182320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1441-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Chew, Pei G. Dobson, Laura E. Garg, Pankaj Fairbairn, Timothy A. Musa, Tarique A. Uddin, Akhlaque Swoboda, Peter P. Foley, James R. Fent, Graham J. Brown, Louise A. E. Onciul, Sebastian Plein, Sven Blackman, Daniel J. Greenwood, John P. CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome |
title | CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome |
title_full | CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome |
title_fullStr | CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome |
title_full_unstemmed | CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome |
title_short | CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome |
title_sort | cmr quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30182320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1441-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chewpeig cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT dobsonlaurae cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT gargpankaj cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT fairbairntimothya cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT musatariquea cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT uddinakhlaque cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT swobodapeterp cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT foleyjamesr cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT fentgrahamj cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT brownlouiseae cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT onciulsebastian cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT pleinsven cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT blackmandanielj cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome AT greenwoodjohnp cmrquantitationofchangeinmitralregurgitationfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementtavrimpactonleftventricularreverseremodelingandoutcome |