Cargando…

Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and safety properties of the test (CJ-40001) and reference (NESP(®)) versions of darbepoetin alfa following a single subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) administration in healthy male subjects. METHODS: A single-blind,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seokuee, Hong, Taegon, Ko, Jae-Wook, Huh, Wooseong, Kim, Jung-Ryul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30506495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-0323-0
_version_ 1783394983979515904
author Kim, Seokuee
Hong, Taegon
Ko, Jae-Wook
Huh, Wooseong
Kim, Jung-Ryul
author_facet Kim, Seokuee
Hong, Taegon
Ko, Jae-Wook
Huh, Wooseong
Kim, Jung-Ryul
author_sort Kim, Seokuee
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and safety properties of the test (CJ-40001) and reference (NESP(®)) versions of darbepoetin alfa following a single subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) administration in healthy male subjects. METHODS: A single-blind, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-intervention crossover study was conducted, with two separate parts consisting of SC or IV administration. In each period, either a test or reference product was administered via the SC or IV route. Serial blood samples for PK analysis and the reticulocyte, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and red blood cell counts for PD analysis were collected for up to 360 or 264 h after SC or IV administration, respectively. The PK and PD parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for the PK and PD parameters between the two interventions were estimated. Safety and anti-drug antibody profile assessments were performed. RESULTS: The mean darbepoetin alfa concentration–time profiles were comparable between the two products for SC and IV administration. Additionally, the PD and safety profiles were similar between the two products. Anti-drug antibody reactivity was negative for all samples from both intervention groups for SC and IV administration. The time-matched serum darbepoetin alfa concentration and the PD markers presented a counter-clockwise hysteresis, which suggests a time delay between the exposure and response. CONCLUSION: The test and reference darbepoetin alfa formulations had similar PK, PD, and safety profiles. Thus, it is expected that the two formulations are able to be used interchangeably in clinical settings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03542916.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6373390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63733902019-03-01 Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers Kim, Seokuee Hong, Taegon Ko, Jae-Wook Huh, Wooseong Kim, Jung-Ryul BioDrugs Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and safety properties of the test (CJ-40001) and reference (NESP(®)) versions of darbepoetin alfa following a single subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) administration in healthy male subjects. METHODS: A single-blind, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-intervention crossover study was conducted, with two separate parts consisting of SC or IV administration. In each period, either a test or reference product was administered via the SC or IV route. Serial blood samples for PK analysis and the reticulocyte, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and red blood cell counts for PD analysis were collected for up to 360 or 264 h after SC or IV administration, respectively. The PK and PD parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for the PK and PD parameters between the two interventions were estimated. Safety and anti-drug antibody profile assessments were performed. RESULTS: The mean darbepoetin alfa concentration–time profiles were comparable between the two products for SC and IV administration. Additionally, the PD and safety profiles were similar between the two products. Anti-drug antibody reactivity was negative for all samples from both intervention groups for SC and IV administration. The time-matched serum darbepoetin alfa concentration and the PD markers presented a counter-clockwise hysteresis, which suggests a time delay between the exposure and response. CONCLUSION: The test and reference darbepoetin alfa formulations had similar PK, PD, and safety profiles. Thus, it is expected that the two formulations are able to be used interchangeably in clinical settings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03542916. Springer International Publishing 2018-12-01 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6373390/ /pubmed/30506495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-0323-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kim, Seokuee
Hong, Taegon
Ko, Jae-Wook
Huh, Wooseong
Kim, Jung-Ryul
Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers
title Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers
title_full Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers
title_fullStr Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers
title_short Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers
title_sort comparison of the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic relationships of two darbepoetin alfa formulations in healthy male volunteers
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30506495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-0323-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseokuee comparisonofthepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicrelationshipsoftwodarbepoetinalfaformulationsinhealthymalevolunteers
AT hongtaegon comparisonofthepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicrelationshipsoftwodarbepoetinalfaformulationsinhealthymalevolunteers
AT kojaewook comparisonofthepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicrelationshipsoftwodarbepoetinalfaformulationsinhealthymalevolunteers
AT huhwooseong comparisonofthepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicrelationshipsoftwodarbepoetinalfaformulationsinhealthymalevolunteers
AT kimjungryul comparisonofthepharmacokineticpharmacodynamicrelationshipsoftwodarbepoetinalfaformulationsinhealthymalevolunteers