Cargando…

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of extended treatment with CT-P10, a rituximab biosimilar, compared with rituximab reference products sourced from the USA and the EU (US-RTX and EU-RTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for up to 48 weeks. METHODS: In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suh, Chang-Hee, Yoo, Dae Hyun, Berrocal Kasay, Alfredo, Chalouhi El-Khouri, Elia, Cons Molina, Francisco Fidenci, Shesternya, Pavel, Miranda, Pedro, Medina-Rodriguez, Francisco G., Wiland, Piotr, Jeka, Slawomir, Chavez-Corrales, Jose, Linde, Thomas, Hrycaj, Pawel, Abello-Banfi, Mauricio, Hospodarskyy, Ihor, Jaworski, Janusz, Piotrowski, Mariusz, Brzosko, Marek, Krogulec, Marek, Shevchuk, Sergii, Calvo, Armando, Andersone, Daina, Park, Won, Shim, Seung Cheol, Lee, Sang Joon, Lee, Sung Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-00331-4
_version_ 1783394984208105472
author Suh, Chang-Hee
Yoo, Dae Hyun
Berrocal Kasay, Alfredo
Chalouhi El-Khouri, Elia
Cons Molina, Francisco Fidenci
Shesternya, Pavel
Miranda, Pedro
Medina-Rodriguez, Francisco G.
Wiland, Piotr
Jeka, Slawomir
Chavez-Corrales, Jose
Linde, Thomas
Hrycaj, Pawel
Abello-Banfi, Mauricio
Hospodarskyy, Ihor
Jaworski, Janusz
Piotrowski, Mariusz
Brzosko, Marek
Krogulec, Marek
Shevchuk, Sergii
Calvo, Armando
Andersone, Daina
Park, Won
Shim, Seung Cheol
Lee, Sang Joon
Lee, Sung Young
author_facet Suh, Chang-Hee
Yoo, Dae Hyun
Berrocal Kasay, Alfredo
Chalouhi El-Khouri, Elia
Cons Molina, Francisco Fidenci
Shesternya, Pavel
Miranda, Pedro
Medina-Rodriguez, Francisco G.
Wiland, Piotr
Jeka, Slawomir
Chavez-Corrales, Jose
Linde, Thomas
Hrycaj, Pawel
Abello-Banfi, Mauricio
Hospodarskyy, Ihor
Jaworski, Janusz
Piotrowski, Mariusz
Brzosko, Marek
Krogulec, Marek
Shevchuk, Sergii
Calvo, Armando
Andersone, Daina
Park, Won
Shim, Seung Cheol
Lee, Sang Joon
Lee, Sung Young
author_sort Suh, Chang-Hee
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of extended treatment with CT-P10, a rituximab biosimilar, compared with rituximab reference products sourced from the USA and the EU (US-RTX and EU-RTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for up to 48 weeks. METHODS: In this multinational, randomized, double-blind trial, adults with active RA received up to two courses of CT-P10, US-RTX, or EU-RTX alongside methotrexate. Efficacy endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 372 patients randomized to the study drug, 330 (88.7%) completed the second treatment course. Mean change from baseline to week 48 in DAS28-C-reactive protein was comparable in the CT-P10 and combined rituximab (US-RTX and EU-RTX) groups (− 2.7 and − 2.6, respectively). ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates at week 48 indicated no differences between groups (80.6%, 55.4%, and 31.7% vs. 79.8%, 53.9%, and 33.7% in the CT-P10 and combined rituximab groups, respectively). Similar improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and all medical outcomes in the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, including physical and mental health, were seen in all groups. At week 48, antidrug antibodies were detected in 4.9%, 9.4%, and 8.6% of patients in the CT-P10, US-RTX, and EU-RTX groups, respectively. CT-P10 and rituximab displayed similar pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profiles. CONCLUSION: CT-P10 was similar to EU-RTX and US-RTX in terms of efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety up to week 48. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02149121. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-018-00331-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6373391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63733912019-03-01 Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial Suh, Chang-Hee Yoo, Dae Hyun Berrocal Kasay, Alfredo Chalouhi El-Khouri, Elia Cons Molina, Francisco Fidenci Shesternya, Pavel Miranda, Pedro Medina-Rodriguez, Francisco G. Wiland, Piotr Jeka, Slawomir Chavez-Corrales, Jose Linde, Thomas Hrycaj, Pawel Abello-Banfi, Mauricio Hospodarskyy, Ihor Jaworski, Janusz Piotrowski, Mariusz Brzosko, Marek Krogulec, Marek Shevchuk, Sergii Calvo, Armando Andersone, Daina Park, Won Shim, Seung Cheol Lee, Sang Joon Lee, Sung Young BioDrugs Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of extended treatment with CT-P10, a rituximab biosimilar, compared with rituximab reference products sourced from the USA and the EU (US-RTX and EU-RTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for up to 48 weeks. METHODS: In this multinational, randomized, double-blind trial, adults with active RA received up to two courses of CT-P10, US-RTX, or EU-RTX alongside methotrexate. Efficacy endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 372 patients randomized to the study drug, 330 (88.7%) completed the second treatment course. Mean change from baseline to week 48 in DAS28-C-reactive protein was comparable in the CT-P10 and combined rituximab (US-RTX and EU-RTX) groups (− 2.7 and − 2.6, respectively). ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates at week 48 indicated no differences between groups (80.6%, 55.4%, and 31.7% vs. 79.8%, 53.9%, and 33.7% in the CT-P10 and combined rituximab groups, respectively). Similar improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and all medical outcomes in the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, including physical and mental health, were seen in all groups. At week 48, antidrug antibodies were detected in 4.9%, 9.4%, and 8.6% of patients in the CT-P10, US-RTX, and EU-RTX groups, respectively. CT-P10 and rituximab displayed similar pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profiles. CONCLUSION: CT-P10 was similar to EU-RTX and US-RTX in terms of efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety up to week 48. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02149121. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-018-00331-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-02-05 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6373391/ /pubmed/30719632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-00331-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Suh, Chang-Hee
Yoo, Dae Hyun
Berrocal Kasay, Alfredo
Chalouhi El-Khouri, Elia
Cons Molina, Francisco Fidenci
Shesternya, Pavel
Miranda, Pedro
Medina-Rodriguez, Francisco G.
Wiland, Piotr
Jeka, Slawomir
Chavez-Corrales, Jose
Linde, Thomas
Hrycaj, Pawel
Abello-Banfi, Mauricio
Hospodarskyy, Ihor
Jaworski, Janusz
Piotrowski, Mariusz
Brzosko, Marek
Krogulec, Marek
Shevchuk, Sergii
Calvo, Armando
Andersone, Daina
Park, Won
Shim, Seung Cheol
Lee, Sang Joon
Lee, Sung Young
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial
title Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial
title_full Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial
title_fullStr Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial
title_short Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial
title_sort long-term efficacy and safety of biosimilar ct-p10 versus innovator rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week results from a randomized phase iii trial
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-00331-4
work_keys_str_mv AT suhchanghee longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT yoodaehyun longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT berrocalkasayalfredo longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT chalouhielkhourielia longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT consmolinafranciscofidenci longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT shesternyapavel longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT mirandapedro longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT medinarodriguezfranciscog longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT wilandpiotr longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT jekaslawomir longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT chavezcorralesjose longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT lindethomas longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT hrycajpawel longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT abellobanfimauricio longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT hospodarskyyihor longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT jaworskijanusz longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT piotrowskimariusz longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT brzoskomarek longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT krogulecmarek longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT shevchuksergii longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT calvoarmando longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT andersonedaina longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT parkwon longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT shimseungcheol longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT leesangjoon longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial
AT leesungyoung longtermefficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarctp10versusinnovatorrituximabinrheumatoidarthritis48weekresultsfromarandomizedphaseiiitrial