Cargando…

The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior

Sexual behavior is the open manifestation of a complex interplay between psychophysiological mechanisms that either facilitate or inhibit sexual thoughts, desires, and associated behaviors. Whereas sexual excitation has been widely studied, less is known about the impact of inhibitory control mechan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine, Emmerling, Franziska, Dewitte, Marieke, Sack, Alexander T., Schuhmann, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1283-7
_version_ 1783395006307893248
author Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine
Emmerling, Franziska
Dewitte, Marieke
Sack, Alexander T.
Schuhmann, Teresa
author_facet Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine
Emmerling, Franziska
Dewitte, Marieke
Sack, Alexander T.
Schuhmann, Teresa
author_sort Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine
collection PubMed
description Sexual behavior is the open manifestation of a complex interplay between psychophysiological mechanisms that either facilitate or inhibit sexual thoughts, desires, and associated behaviors. Whereas sexual excitation has been widely studied, less is known about the impact of inhibitory control mechanisms that enable individuals to refrain from sexual cognition and behavior. The present study examined: (1) the relationship between general and sexual inhibitory mechanisms (as measured through self-reports and computer-based tasks), (2) the relation between sexual inhibitory processes at cognitive and motor-motivational levels and with sexual inhibition as an individual trait, and (3) the predictive value of these parameters on sexual thoughts (cognition) and behavior. We demonstrate that general inhibitory control (i.e., the ability to suppress any preponderant response) and the specific inhibition of sexual responses represent distinct processes that require at least partly different control mechanisms. Similarly, the ability to inhibit sexual visual input and the ability to suppress sexually driven responses seem to be two independent processes. The different inhibitory processes distinctively predicted the frequency of sexual thoughts and sexual behavior. We propose that these different inhibitory mechanisms are at play during different phases of sexual regulation (before and after the generation and unfolding of sexual arousal) and that a specific deficit in one of these processes may underlie the distinctive symptomatology and comorbidity of sexual disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6373525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63735252019-03-04 The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine Emmerling, Franziska Dewitte, Marieke Sack, Alexander T. Schuhmann, Teresa Arch Sex Behav Original Paper Sexual behavior is the open manifestation of a complex interplay between psychophysiological mechanisms that either facilitate or inhibit sexual thoughts, desires, and associated behaviors. Whereas sexual excitation has been widely studied, less is known about the impact of inhibitory control mechanisms that enable individuals to refrain from sexual cognition and behavior. The present study examined: (1) the relationship between general and sexual inhibitory mechanisms (as measured through self-reports and computer-based tasks), (2) the relation between sexual inhibitory processes at cognitive and motor-motivational levels and with sexual inhibition as an individual trait, and (3) the predictive value of these parameters on sexual thoughts (cognition) and behavior. We demonstrate that general inhibitory control (i.e., the ability to suppress any preponderant response) and the specific inhibition of sexual responses represent distinct processes that require at least partly different control mechanisms. Similarly, the ability to inhibit sexual visual input and the ability to suppress sexually driven responses seem to be two independent processes. The different inhibitory processes distinctively predicted the frequency of sexual thoughts and sexual behavior. We propose that these different inhibitory mechanisms are at play during different phases of sexual regulation (before and after the generation and unfolding of sexual arousal) and that a specific deficit in one of these processes may underlie the distinctive symptomatology and comorbidity of sexual disorders. Springer US 2019-01-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6373525/ /pubmed/30671876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1283-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine
Emmerling, Franziska
Dewitte, Marieke
Sack, Alexander T.
Schuhmann, Teresa
The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior
title The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior
title_full The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior
title_fullStr The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior
title_short The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior
title_sort role of inhibitory control mechanisms in the regulation of sexual behavior
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1283-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigueznietogeraldine theroleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior
AT emmerlingfranziska theroleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior
AT dewittemarieke theroleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior
AT sackalexandert theroleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior
AT schuhmannteresa theroleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior
AT rodrigueznietogeraldine roleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior
AT emmerlingfranziska roleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior
AT dewittemarieke roleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior
AT sackalexandert roleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior
AT schuhmannteresa roleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior