Cargando…
The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior
Sexual behavior is the open manifestation of a complex interplay between psychophysiological mechanisms that either facilitate or inhibit sexual thoughts, desires, and associated behaviors. Whereas sexual excitation has been widely studied, less is known about the impact of inhibitory control mechan...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1283-7 |
_version_ | 1783395006307893248 |
---|---|
author | Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine Emmerling, Franziska Dewitte, Marieke Sack, Alexander T. Schuhmann, Teresa |
author_facet | Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine Emmerling, Franziska Dewitte, Marieke Sack, Alexander T. Schuhmann, Teresa |
author_sort | Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sexual behavior is the open manifestation of a complex interplay between psychophysiological mechanisms that either facilitate or inhibit sexual thoughts, desires, and associated behaviors. Whereas sexual excitation has been widely studied, less is known about the impact of inhibitory control mechanisms that enable individuals to refrain from sexual cognition and behavior. The present study examined: (1) the relationship between general and sexual inhibitory mechanisms (as measured through self-reports and computer-based tasks), (2) the relation between sexual inhibitory processes at cognitive and motor-motivational levels and with sexual inhibition as an individual trait, and (3) the predictive value of these parameters on sexual thoughts (cognition) and behavior. We demonstrate that general inhibitory control (i.e., the ability to suppress any preponderant response) and the specific inhibition of sexual responses represent distinct processes that require at least partly different control mechanisms. Similarly, the ability to inhibit sexual visual input and the ability to suppress sexually driven responses seem to be two independent processes. The different inhibitory processes distinctively predicted the frequency of sexual thoughts and sexual behavior. We propose that these different inhibitory mechanisms are at play during different phases of sexual regulation (before and after the generation and unfolding of sexual arousal) and that a specific deficit in one of these processes may underlie the distinctive symptomatology and comorbidity of sexual disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6373525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63735252019-03-04 The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine Emmerling, Franziska Dewitte, Marieke Sack, Alexander T. Schuhmann, Teresa Arch Sex Behav Original Paper Sexual behavior is the open manifestation of a complex interplay between psychophysiological mechanisms that either facilitate or inhibit sexual thoughts, desires, and associated behaviors. Whereas sexual excitation has been widely studied, less is known about the impact of inhibitory control mechanisms that enable individuals to refrain from sexual cognition and behavior. The present study examined: (1) the relationship between general and sexual inhibitory mechanisms (as measured through self-reports and computer-based tasks), (2) the relation between sexual inhibitory processes at cognitive and motor-motivational levels and with sexual inhibition as an individual trait, and (3) the predictive value of these parameters on sexual thoughts (cognition) and behavior. We demonstrate that general inhibitory control (i.e., the ability to suppress any preponderant response) and the specific inhibition of sexual responses represent distinct processes that require at least partly different control mechanisms. Similarly, the ability to inhibit sexual visual input and the ability to suppress sexually driven responses seem to be two independent processes. The different inhibitory processes distinctively predicted the frequency of sexual thoughts and sexual behavior. We propose that these different inhibitory mechanisms are at play during different phases of sexual regulation (before and after the generation and unfolding of sexual arousal) and that a specific deficit in one of these processes may underlie the distinctive symptomatology and comorbidity of sexual disorders. Springer US 2019-01-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6373525/ /pubmed/30671876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1283-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Rodriguez-Nieto, Geraldine Emmerling, Franziska Dewitte, Marieke Sack, Alexander T. Schuhmann, Teresa The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior |
title | The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior |
title_full | The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior |
title_fullStr | The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior |
title_short | The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior |
title_sort | role of inhibitory control mechanisms in the regulation of sexual behavior |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1283-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodrigueznietogeraldine theroleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior AT emmerlingfranziska theroleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior AT dewittemarieke theroleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior AT sackalexandert theroleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior AT schuhmannteresa theroleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior AT rodrigueznietogeraldine roleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior AT emmerlingfranziska roleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior AT dewittemarieke roleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior AT sackalexandert roleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior AT schuhmannteresa roleofinhibitorycontrolmechanismsintheregulationofsexualbehavior |