Cargando…

Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3

We report the performance of HADDOCK in the 2018 iteration of the Grand Challenge organised by the D3R consortium. Building on the findings of our participation in last year’s challenge, we significantly improved our pose prediction protocol which resulted in a mean RMSD for the top scoring pose of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koukos, Panagiotis I., Xue, Li C., Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-018-0148-4
_version_ 1783395007517949952
author Koukos, Panagiotis I.
Xue, Li C.
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
author_facet Koukos, Panagiotis I.
Xue, Li C.
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
author_sort Koukos, Panagiotis I.
collection PubMed
description We report the performance of HADDOCK in the 2018 iteration of the Grand Challenge organised by the D3R consortium. Building on the findings of our participation in last year’s challenge, we significantly improved our pose prediction protocol which resulted in a mean RMSD for the top scoring pose of 3.04 and 2.67 Å for the cross-docking and self-docking experiments respectively, which corresponds to an overall success rate of 63% and 71% when considering the top1 and top5 models respectively. This performance ranks HADDOCK as the 6th and 3rd best performing group (excluding multiple submissions from a same group) out of a total of 44 and 47 submissions respectively. Our ligand-based binding affinity predictor is the 3rd best predictor overall, behind only the two leading structure-based implementations, and the best ligand-based one with a Kendall’s Tau correlation of 0.36 for the Cathepsin challenge. It also performed well in the classification part of the Kinase challenges, with Matthews Correlation Coefficients of 0.49 (ranked 1st), 0.39 (ranked 4th) and 0.21 (ranked 4th) for the JAK2, vEGFR2 and p38a targets respectively. Through our participation in last year’s competition we came to the conclusion that template selection is of critical importance for the successful outcome of the docking. This year we have made improvements in two additional areas of importance: ligand conformer selection and initial positioning, which have been key to our excellent pose prediction performance this year. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10822-018-0148-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6373529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63735292019-03-04 Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3 Koukos, Panagiotis I. Xue, Li C. Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. J Comput Aided Mol Des Article We report the performance of HADDOCK in the 2018 iteration of the Grand Challenge organised by the D3R consortium. Building on the findings of our participation in last year’s challenge, we significantly improved our pose prediction protocol which resulted in a mean RMSD for the top scoring pose of 3.04 and 2.67 Å for the cross-docking and self-docking experiments respectively, which corresponds to an overall success rate of 63% and 71% when considering the top1 and top5 models respectively. This performance ranks HADDOCK as the 6th and 3rd best performing group (excluding multiple submissions from a same group) out of a total of 44 and 47 submissions respectively. Our ligand-based binding affinity predictor is the 3rd best predictor overall, behind only the two leading structure-based implementations, and the best ligand-based one with a Kendall’s Tau correlation of 0.36 for the Cathepsin challenge. It also performed well in the classification part of the Kinase challenges, with Matthews Correlation Coefficients of 0.49 (ranked 1st), 0.39 (ranked 4th) and 0.21 (ranked 4th) for the JAK2, vEGFR2 and p38a targets respectively. Through our participation in last year’s competition we came to the conclusion that template selection is of critical importance for the successful outcome of the docking. This year we have made improvements in two additional areas of importance: ligand conformer selection and initial positioning, which have been key to our excellent pose prediction performance this year. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10822-018-0148-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-20 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6373529/ /pubmed/30128928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-018-0148-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Koukos, Panagiotis I.
Xue, Li C.
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
title Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
title_full Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
title_fullStr Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
title_full_unstemmed Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
title_short Protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: Lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3
title_sort protein–ligand pose and affinity prediction: lessons from d3r grand challenge 3
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-018-0148-4
work_keys_str_mv AT koukospanagiotisi proteinligandposeandaffinitypredictionlessonsfromd3rgrandchallenge3
AT xuelic proteinligandposeandaffinitypredictionlessonsfromd3rgrandchallenge3
AT bonvinalexandremjj proteinligandposeandaffinitypredictionlessonsfromd3rgrandchallenge3