Cargando…
Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center
BACKGROUND: Treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) with lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) may cause cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) overdrainage. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether LPSs, including gravitational “add-on” and programmable pressure valves (PPVs/+GVs), reduce complications and im...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29688482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy044 |
_version_ | 1783395054220476416 |
---|---|
author | Nakajima, Madoka Miyajima, Masakazu Akiba, Chihiro Ogino, Ikuko Kawamura, Kaito Sugano, Hidenori Hara, Takeshi Tange, Yuichi Fusegi, Keiko Karagiozov, Kostadin Arai, Hajime |
author_facet | Nakajima, Madoka Miyajima, Masakazu Akiba, Chihiro Ogino, Ikuko Kawamura, Kaito Sugano, Hidenori Hara, Takeshi Tange, Yuichi Fusegi, Keiko Karagiozov, Kostadin Arai, Hajime |
author_sort | Nakajima, Madoka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) with lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) may cause cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) overdrainage. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether LPSs, including gravitational “add-on” and programmable pressure valves (PPVs/+GVs), reduce complications and improve outcomes. METHODS: We compared PPVs/+small lumen abdominal catheters (SLs) to PPVs/+GVs using different opening pressures for supine and standing positions. We analyzed 115 patients with iNPH in 2 consequent cohorts: 48 patients receiving LPSs with PPVs/+SLs and 67 patients receiving LPSs with PPVs/+GVs. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Japan iNPH grading scale, Mini Mental State Examination, Frontal Assessment Battery, and CSF biomarkers were evaluated. RESULTS: Comparisons of postoperative clinical factors in 64 patients in the PPV/+SL and PPV/+GV groups using 1:1 propensity score matching revealed differences in the mean (±standard deviation) postoperative mRS (2.65 ± 1.07 vs 2.16 ± 1.02, P = .049) and gait disturbance scores (1.97 ± 1.03 vs 1.39 ± 0.92, P = .011). Thus, outcomes improved in the LPS group with the GV. Serious and nonserious adverse event rates for the PPV/+SL and PPV/+GV groups were 22.9% and 19.4% (P = .647) and 38% and 17.9% (P = .018), respectively, indicating higher rates of subdural collections for the PPV/+SL group. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to examine LPS treatment for iNPH using a GV in tandem with a PPV. Our results suggest that the CSF shunt flow volume is restricted in the standing position and maintained in the supine position, thus improving iNPH symptoms. This may reduce intracranial CSF hypotension-related complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6373832 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63738322019-02-25 Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center Nakajima, Madoka Miyajima, Masakazu Akiba, Chihiro Ogino, Ikuko Kawamura, Kaito Sugano, Hidenori Hara, Takeshi Tange, Yuichi Fusegi, Keiko Karagiozov, Kostadin Arai, Hajime Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Case Series BACKGROUND: Treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) with lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) may cause cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) overdrainage. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether LPSs, including gravitational “add-on” and programmable pressure valves (PPVs/+GVs), reduce complications and improve outcomes. METHODS: We compared PPVs/+small lumen abdominal catheters (SLs) to PPVs/+GVs using different opening pressures for supine and standing positions. We analyzed 115 patients with iNPH in 2 consequent cohorts: 48 patients receiving LPSs with PPVs/+SLs and 67 patients receiving LPSs with PPVs/+GVs. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Japan iNPH grading scale, Mini Mental State Examination, Frontal Assessment Battery, and CSF biomarkers were evaluated. RESULTS: Comparisons of postoperative clinical factors in 64 patients in the PPV/+SL and PPV/+GV groups using 1:1 propensity score matching revealed differences in the mean (±standard deviation) postoperative mRS (2.65 ± 1.07 vs 2.16 ± 1.02, P = .049) and gait disturbance scores (1.97 ± 1.03 vs 1.39 ± 0.92, P = .011). Thus, outcomes improved in the LPS group with the GV. Serious and nonserious adverse event rates for the PPV/+SL and PPV/+GV groups were 22.9% and 19.4% (P = .647) and 38% and 17.9% (P = .018), respectively, indicating higher rates of subdural collections for the PPV/+SL group. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to examine LPS treatment for iNPH using a GV in tandem with a PPV. Our results suggest that the CSF shunt flow volume is restricted in the standing position and maintained in the supine position, thus improving iNPH symptoms. This may reduce intracranial CSF hypotension-related complications. Oxford University Press 2018-12 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6373832/ /pubmed/29688482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy044 Text en © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Series Nakajima, Madoka Miyajima, Masakazu Akiba, Chihiro Ogino, Ikuko Kawamura, Kaito Sugano, Hidenori Hara, Takeshi Tange, Yuichi Fusegi, Keiko Karagiozov, Kostadin Arai, Hajime Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center |
title | Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center |
title_full | Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center |
title_fullStr | Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center |
title_full_unstemmed | Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center |
title_short | Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center |
title_sort | lumboperitoneal shunts for the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparison of small-lumen abdominal catheters to gravitational add-on valves in a single center |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29688482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakajimamadoka lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter AT miyajimamasakazu lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter AT akibachihiro lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter AT oginoikuko lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter AT kawamurakaito lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter AT suganohidenori lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter AT haratakeshi lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter AT tangeyuichi lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter AT fusegikeiko lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter AT karagiozovkostadin lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter AT araihajime lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter |