Cargando…

Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center

BACKGROUND: Treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) with lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) may cause cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) overdrainage. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether LPSs, including gravitational “add-on” and programmable pressure valves (PPVs/+GVs), reduce complications and im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakajima, Madoka, Miyajima, Masakazu, Akiba, Chihiro, Ogino, Ikuko, Kawamura, Kaito, Sugano, Hidenori, Hara, Takeshi, Tange, Yuichi, Fusegi, Keiko, Karagiozov, Kostadin, Arai, Hajime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29688482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy044
_version_ 1783395054220476416
author Nakajima, Madoka
Miyajima, Masakazu
Akiba, Chihiro
Ogino, Ikuko
Kawamura, Kaito
Sugano, Hidenori
Hara, Takeshi
Tange, Yuichi
Fusegi, Keiko
Karagiozov, Kostadin
Arai, Hajime
author_facet Nakajima, Madoka
Miyajima, Masakazu
Akiba, Chihiro
Ogino, Ikuko
Kawamura, Kaito
Sugano, Hidenori
Hara, Takeshi
Tange, Yuichi
Fusegi, Keiko
Karagiozov, Kostadin
Arai, Hajime
author_sort Nakajima, Madoka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) with lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) may cause cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) overdrainage. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether LPSs, including gravitational “add-on” and programmable pressure valves (PPVs/+GVs), reduce complications and improve outcomes. METHODS: We compared PPVs/+small lumen abdominal catheters (SLs) to PPVs/+GVs using different opening pressures for supine and standing positions. We analyzed 115 patients with iNPH in 2 consequent cohorts: 48 patients receiving LPSs with PPVs/+SLs and 67 patients receiving LPSs with PPVs/+GVs. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Japan iNPH grading scale, Mini Mental State Examination, Frontal Assessment Battery, and CSF biomarkers were evaluated. RESULTS: Comparisons of postoperative clinical factors in 64 patients in the PPV/+SL and PPV/+GV groups using 1:1 propensity score matching revealed differences in the mean (±standard deviation) postoperative mRS (2.65 ± 1.07 vs 2.16 ± 1.02, P = .049) and gait disturbance scores (1.97 ± 1.03 vs 1.39 ± 0.92, P = .011). Thus, outcomes improved in the LPS group with the GV. Serious and nonserious adverse event rates for the PPV/+SL and PPV/+GV groups were 22.9% and 19.4% (P = .647) and 38% and 17.9% (P = .018), respectively, indicating higher rates of subdural collections for the PPV/+SL group. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to examine LPS treatment for iNPH using a GV in tandem with a PPV. Our results suggest that the CSF shunt flow volume is restricted in the standing position and maintained in the supine position, thus improving iNPH symptoms. This may reduce intracranial CSF hypotension-related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6373832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63738322019-02-25 Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center Nakajima, Madoka Miyajima, Masakazu Akiba, Chihiro Ogino, Ikuko Kawamura, Kaito Sugano, Hidenori Hara, Takeshi Tange, Yuichi Fusegi, Keiko Karagiozov, Kostadin Arai, Hajime Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Case Series BACKGROUND: Treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) with lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) may cause cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) overdrainage. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether LPSs, including gravitational “add-on” and programmable pressure valves (PPVs/+GVs), reduce complications and improve outcomes. METHODS: We compared PPVs/+small lumen abdominal catheters (SLs) to PPVs/+GVs using different opening pressures for supine and standing positions. We analyzed 115 patients with iNPH in 2 consequent cohorts: 48 patients receiving LPSs with PPVs/+SLs and 67 patients receiving LPSs with PPVs/+GVs. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Japan iNPH grading scale, Mini Mental State Examination, Frontal Assessment Battery, and CSF biomarkers were evaluated. RESULTS: Comparisons of postoperative clinical factors in 64 patients in the PPV/+SL and PPV/+GV groups using 1:1 propensity score matching revealed differences in the mean (±standard deviation) postoperative mRS (2.65 ± 1.07 vs 2.16 ± 1.02, P = .049) and gait disturbance scores (1.97 ± 1.03 vs 1.39 ± 0.92, P = .011). Thus, outcomes improved in the LPS group with the GV. Serious and nonserious adverse event rates for the PPV/+SL and PPV/+GV groups were 22.9% and 19.4% (P = .647) and 38% and 17.9% (P = .018), respectively, indicating higher rates of subdural collections for the PPV/+SL group. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to examine LPS treatment for iNPH using a GV in tandem with a PPV. Our results suggest that the CSF shunt flow volume is restricted in the standing position and maintained in the supine position, thus improving iNPH symptoms. This may reduce intracranial CSF hypotension-related complications. Oxford University Press 2018-12 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6373832/ /pubmed/29688482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy044 Text en © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Series
Nakajima, Madoka
Miyajima, Masakazu
Akiba, Chihiro
Ogino, Ikuko
Kawamura, Kaito
Sugano, Hidenori
Hara, Takeshi
Tange, Yuichi
Fusegi, Keiko
Karagiozov, Kostadin
Arai, Hajime
Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center
title Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center
title_full Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center
title_fullStr Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center
title_full_unstemmed Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center
title_short Lumboperitoneal Shunts for the Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comparison of Small-Lumen Abdominal Catheters to Gravitational Add-On Valves in a Single Center
title_sort lumboperitoneal shunts for the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparison of small-lumen abdominal catheters to gravitational add-on valves in a single center
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29688482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy044
work_keys_str_mv AT nakajimamadoka lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter
AT miyajimamasakazu lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter
AT akibachihiro lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter
AT oginoikuko lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter
AT kawamurakaito lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter
AT suganohidenori lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter
AT haratakeshi lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter
AT tangeyuichi lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter
AT fusegikeiko lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter
AT karagiozovkostadin lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter
AT araihajime lumboperitonealshuntsforthetreatmentofidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusacomparisonofsmalllumenabdominalcatheterstogravitationaladdonvalvesinasinglecenter