Cargando…
Accurate risk estimation of β-amyloid positivity to identify prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Cross-validation study of practical algorithms
INTRODUCTION: The aim was to create readily available algorithms that estimate the individual risk of β-amyloid (Aβ) positivity. METHODS: The algorithms were tested in BioFINDER (n = 391, subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment) and validated in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimagin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier, Inc
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30365928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.08.014 |
_version_ | 1783395108110991360 |
---|---|
author | Palmqvist, Sebastian Insel, Philip S. Zetterberg, Henrik Blennow, Kaj Brix, Britta Stomrud, Erik Mattsson, Niklas Hansson, Oskar |
author_facet | Palmqvist, Sebastian Insel, Philip S. Zetterberg, Henrik Blennow, Kaj Brix, Britta Stomrud, Erik Mattsson, Niklas Hansson, Oskar |
author_sort | Palmqvist, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim was to create readily available algorithms that estimate the individual risk of β-amyloid (Aβ) positivity. METHODS: The algorithms were tested in BioFINDER (n = 391, subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment) and validated in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (n = 661, subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment). The examined predictors of Aβ status were demographics; cognitive tests; white matter lesions; apolipoprotein E (APOE); and plasma Aβ(42)/Aβ(40), tau, and neurofilament light. RESULTS: Aβ status was accurately estimated in BioFINDER using age, 10-word delayed recall or Mini–Mental State Examination, and APOE (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve = 0.81 [0.77–0.85] to 0.83 [0.79–0.87]). When validated, the models performed almost identical in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve = 0.80–0.82) and within different age, subjective cognitive decline, and mild cognitive impairment populations. Plasma Aβ(42)/Aβ(40) improved the models slightly. DISCUSSION: The algorithms are implemented on http://amyloidrisk.com where the individual probability of being Aβ positive can be calculated. This is useful in the workup of prodromal Alzheimer's disease and can reduce the number needed to screen in Alzheimer's disease trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6374284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier, Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63742842019-02-25 Accurate risk estimation of β-amyloid positivity to identify prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Cross-validation study of practical algorithms Palmqvist, Sebastian Insel, Philip S. Zetterberg, Henrik Blennow, Kaj Brix, Britta Stomrud, Erik Mattsson, Niklas Hansson, Oskar Alzheimers Dement Article INTRODUCTION: The aim was to create readily available algorithms that estimate the individual risk of β-amyloid (Aβ) positivity. METHODS: The algorithms were tested in BioFINDER (n = 391, subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment) and validated in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (n = 661, subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment). The examined predictors of Aβ status were demographics; cognitive tests; white matter lesions; apolipoprotein E (APOE); and plasma Aβ(42)/Aβ(40), tau, and neurofilament light. RESULTS: Aβ status was accurately estimated in BioFINDER using age, 10-word delayed recall or Mini–Mental State Examination, and APOE (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve = 0.81 [0.77–0.85] to 0.83 [0.79–0.87]). When validated, the models performed almost identical in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve = 0.80–0.82) and within different age, subjective cognitive decline, and mild cognitive impairment populations. Plasma Aβ(42)/Aβ(40) improved the models slightly. DISCUSSION: The algorithms are implemented on http://amyloidrisk.com where the individual probability of being Aβ positive can be calculated. This is useful in the workup of prodromal Alzheimer's disease and can reduce the number needed to screen in Alzheimer's disease trials. Elsevier, Inc 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6374284/ /pubmed/30365928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.08.014 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Palmqvist, Sebastian Insel, Philip S. Zetterberg, Henrik Blennow, Kaj Brix, Britta Stomrud, Erik Mattsson, Niklas Hansson, Oskar Accurate risk estimation of β-amyloid positivity to identify prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Cross-validation study of practical algorithms |
title | Accurate risk estimation of β-amyloid positivity to identify prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Cross-validation study of practical algorithms |
title_full | Accurate risk estimation of β-amyloid positivity to identify prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Cross-validation study of practical algorithms |
title_fullStr | Accurate risk estimation of β-amyloid positivity to identify prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Cross-validation study of practical algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Accurate risk estimation of β-amyloid positivity to identify prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Cross-validation study of practical algorithms |
title_short | Accurate risk estimation of β-amyloid positivity to identify prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Cross-validation study of practical algorithms |
title_sort | accurate risk estimation of β-amyloid positivity to identify prodromal alzheimer's disease: cross-validation study of practical algorithms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30365928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.08.014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palmqvistsebastian accurateriskestimationofbamyloidpositivitytoidentifyprodromalalzheimersdiseasecrossvalidationstudyofpracticalalgorithms AT inselphilips accurateriskestimationofbamyloidpositivitytoidentifyprodromalalzheimersdiseasecrossvalidationstudyofpracticalalgorithms AT zetterberghenrik accurateriskestimationofbamyloidpositivitytoidentifyprodromalalzheimersdiseasecrossvalidationstudyofpracticalalgorithms AT blennowkaj accurateriskestimationofbamyloidpositivitytoidentifyprodromalalzheimersdiseasecrossvalidationstudyofpracticalalgorithms AT brixbritta accurateriskestimationofbamyloidpositivitytoidentifyprodromalalzheimersdiseasecrossvalidationstudyofpracticalalgorithms AT stomruderik accurateriskestimationofbamyloidpositivitytoidentifyprodromalalzheimersdiseasecrossvalidationstudyofpracticalalgorithms AT accurateriskestimationofbamyloidpositivitytoidentifyprodromalalzheimersdiseasecrossvalidationstudyofpracticalalgorithms AT accurateriskestimationofbamyloidpositivitytoidentifyprodromalalzheimersdiseasecrossvalidationstudyofpracticalalgorithms AT mattssonniklas accurateriskestimationofbamyloidpositivitytoidentifyprodromalalzheimersdiseasecrossvalidationstudyofpracticalalgorithms AT hanssonoskar accurateriskestimationofbamyloidpositivitytoidentifyprodromalalzheimersdiseasecrossvalidationstudyofpracticalalgorithms |