Cargando…

MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Radiofrequency Capsulotomy for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Cost-Effectiveness Threshold Analysis

Meta-analytic techniques support neuroablation as a promising therapy for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This technique appears to offer a more favorable complication rate and higher utility than deep brain stimulation. Moreover, these pooled findings suggest that bilatera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Kevin K., Bhati, Mahendra T., Ravikumar, Vinod K., Ghanouni, Pejman, Stein, Sherman C., Halpern, Casey H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00066
_version_ 1783395120182198272
author Kumar, Kevin K.
Bhati, Mahendra T.
Ravikumar, Vinod K.
Ghanouni, Pejman
Stein, Sherman C.
Halpern, Casey H.
author_facet Kumar, Kevin K.
Bhati, Mahendra T.
Ravikumar, Vinod K.
Ghanouni, Pejman
Stein, Sherman C.
Halpern, Casey H.
author_sort Kumar, Kevin K.
collection PubMed
description Meta-analytic techniques support neuroablation as a promising therapy for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This technique appears to offer a more favorable complication rate and higher utility than deep brain stimulation. Moreover, these pooled findings suggest that bilateral radiofrequency (RF) capsulotomy has marginally greater efficacy than stereotactic radiosurgery or cingulotomy. MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) capsulotomy is an emerging approach with a potentially more favorable profile than RF ablation and radiosurgery, with preliminary data suggesting safety and efficacy. As a clinical trial is being developed, our study examined the cost and clinical parameters necessary for MRgFUS capsulotomy to be a more cost-effective alternative to RF capsulotomy. A decision analytical model of MRgFUS with RF capsulotomy for OCD was performed using outcome parameters of percent surgical improvement in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score, complications, and side effects. The analysis compared measured societal costs, derived from Medicare reimbursement rates, and effectiveness, based on published RF data. Effectiveness was defined as the degree to which MRgFUS lowered Y-BOCS score. Given that MRgFUS is a new therapy for OCD with scant published data, theoretical risks of MRgFUS capsulotomy were derived from published essential tremor outcomes. Sensitivity analysis yielded cost, effectiveness, and complication rates as critical MRgFUS parameters defining the cost-effectiveness threshold. Literature search identified eight publications (162 subjects). The average reduction of preoperative Y-BOCS score was 56.6% after RF capsulotomy with a 22.6% improvement in utility, a measure of quality of life. Complications occurred in 16.2% of RF cases. In 1.42% of cases, complications were considered acute-perioperative and incurred additional hospitalization cost. The adverse events, including neurological and neurobehavioral changes, in the other 14.8% of cases did not incur further costs, although they impacted utility. Rollback analysis of RF capsulotomy yielded an expected effectiveness of 0.212 quality-adjusted life years/year at an average cost of $24,099. Compared to RF capsulotomy, MRgFUS was more cost-effective under a range of possible cost and complication rates. While further study will be required, MRgFUS lacks many of the inherent risks associated with more invasive modalities and has potential as a safe and cost-effective treatment for OCD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6374333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63743332019-02-21 MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Radiofrequency Capsulotomy for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Cost-Effectiveness Threshold Analysis Kumar, Kevin K. Bhati, Mahendra T. Ravikumar, Vinod K. Ghanouni, Pejman Stein, Sherman C. Halpern, Casey H. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Meta-analytic techniques support neuroablation as a promising therapy for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This technique appears to offer a more favorable complication rate and higher utility than deep brain stimulation. Moreover, these pooled findings suggest that bilateral radiofrequency (RF) capsulotomy has marginally greater efficacy than stereotactic radiosurgery or cingulotomy. MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) capsulotomy is an emerging approach with a potentially more favorable profile than RF ablation and radiosurgery, with preliminary data suggesting safety and efficacy. As a clinical trial is being developed, our study examined the cost and clinical parameters necessary for MRgFUS capsulotomy to be a more cost-effective alternative to RF capsulotomy. A decision analytical model of MRgFUS with RF capsulotomy for OCD was performed using outcome parameters of percent surgical improvement in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score, complications, and side effects. The analysis compared measured societal costs, derived from Medicare reimbursement rates, and effectiveness, based on published RF data. Effectiveness was defined as the degree to which MRgFUS lowered Y-BOCS score. Given that MRgFUS is a new therapy for OCD with scant published data, theoretical risks of MRgFUS capsulotomy were derived from published essential tremor outcomes. Sensitivity analysis yielded cost, effectiveness, and complication rates as critical MRgFUS parameters defining the cost-effectiveness threshold. Literature search identified eight publications (162 subjects). The average reduction of preoperative Y-BOCS score was 56.6% after RF capsulotomy with a 22.6% improvement in utility, a measure of quality of life. Complications occurred in 16.2% of RF cases. In 1.42% of cases, complications were considered acute-perioperative and incurred additional hospitalization cost. The adverse events, including neurological and neurobehavioral changes, in the other 14.8% of cases did not incur further costs, although they impacted utility. Rollback analysis of RF capsulotomy yielded an expected effectiveness of 0.212 quality-adjusted life years/year at an average cost of $24,099. Compared to RF capsulotomy, MRgFUS was more cost-effective under a range of possible cost and complication rates. While further study will be required, MRgFUS lacks many of the inherent risks associated with more invasive modalities and has potential as a safe and cost-effective treatment for OCD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6374333/ /pubmed/30792625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00066 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kumar, Bhati, Ravikumar, Ghanouni, Stein and Halpern. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kumar, Kevin K.
Bhati, Mahendra T.
Ravikumar, Vinod K.
Ghanouni, Pejman
Stein, Sherman C.
Halpern, Casey H.
MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Radiofrequency Capsulotomy for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Cost-Effectiveness Threshold Analysis
title MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Radiofrequency Capsulotomy for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Cost-Effectiveness Threshold Analysis
title_full MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Radiofrequency Capsulotomy for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Cost-Effectiveness Threshold Analysis
title_fullStr MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Radiofrequency Capsulotomy for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Cost-Effectiveness Threshold Analysis
title_full_unstemmed MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Radiofrequency Capsulotomy for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Cost-Effectiveness Threshold Analysis
title_short MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Radiofrequency Capsulotomy for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Cost-Effectiveness Threshold Analysis
title_sort mr-guided focused ultrasound versus radiofrequency capsulotomy for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a cost-effectiveness threshold analysis
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00066
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarkevink mrguidedfocusedultrasoundversusradiofrequencycapsulotomyfortreatmentrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderacosteffectivenessthresholdanalysis
AT bhatimahendrat mrguidedfocusedultrasoundversusradiofrequencycapsulotomyfortreatmentrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderacosteffectivenessthresholdanalysis
AT ravikumarvinodk mrguidedfocusedultrasoundversusradiofrequencycapsulotomyfortreatmentrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderacosteffectivenessthresholdanalysis
AT ghanounipejman mrguidedfocusedultrasoundversusradiofrequencycapsulotomyfortreatmentrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderacosteffectivenessthresholdanalysis
AT steinshermanc mrguidedfocusedultrasoundversusradiofrequencycapsulotomyfortreatmentrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderacosteffectivenessthresholdanalysis
AT halperncaseyh mrguidedfocusedultrasoundversusradiofrequencycapsulotomyfortreatmentrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderacosteffectivenessthresholdanalysis