Cargando…

High Prevalence of Cefotaxime Resistant Bacteria in Grazing Beef Cattle: A Cross Sectional Study

Although the over-use of antibiotics during food animal production is a potential driver of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms (ARMs), a high prevalence of cefotaxime resistant bacteria (CRB) has been observed in grazing animals raised without antibiotic supplementation. In this cross-sectional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markland, Sarah, Weppelmann, Thomas A., Ma, Zhengxin, Lee, Shinyoung, Mir, Raies A., Teng, Lin, Ginn, Amber, Lee, Choonghee, Ukhanova, Maria, Galindo, Sebastian, Carr, Chad, DiLorenzo, Nicolas, Ahn, Soohyoun, Mah, Jae-Hyung, Kim, Hae-Yeong, Mai, Volker, Mobley, Ray, Morris, J. Glenn, Jeong, KwangCheol Casey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792707
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00176
_version_ 1783395124595654656
author Markland, Sarah
Weppelmann, Thomas A.
Ma, Zhengxin
Lee, Shinyoung
Mir, Raies A.
Teng, Lin
Ginn, Amber
Lee, Choonghee
Ukhanova, Maria
Galindo, Sebastian
Carr, Chad
DiLorenzo, Nicolas
Ahn, Soohyoun
Mah, Jae-Hyung
Kim, Hae-Yeong
Mai, Volker
Mobley, Ray
Morris, J. Glenn
Jeong, KwangCheol Casey
author_facet Markland, Sarah
Weppelmann, Thomas A.
Ma, Zhengxin
Lee, Shinyoung
Mir, Raies A.
Teng, Lin
Ginn, Amber
Lee, Choonghee
Ukhanova, Maria
Galindo, Sebastian
Carr, Chad
DiLorenzo, Nicolas
Ahn, Soohyoun
Mah, Jae-Hyung
Kim, Hae-Yeong
Mai, Volker
Mobley, Ray
Morris, J. Glenn
Jeong, KwangCheol Casey
author_sort Markland, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Although the over-use of antibiotics during food animal production is a potential driver of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms (ARMs), a high prevalence of cefotaxime resistant bacteria (CRB) has been observed in grazing animals raised without antibiotic supplementation. In this cross-sectional study, the prevalence and concentration of CRB in beef cattle on grazing farms were investigated. Fecal samples from the recto-anal junction of cattle (n = 840) and environmental samples (n = 258) were collected from 17 farms in North and Central Florida in the United States, and a survey of farm characteristics, animal husbandry practices, and antibiotic usage was conducted. CRB were detected in fecal samples from 47.4% of all cattle, with the prevalence ranging from 21.1 to 87.5% on farms, and significantly higher (P < 0.001) in calves compared to adult cows (54.1 vs. 41.8%). Environmental samples had a higher prevalence than fecal samples (P < 0.001), with CRB detected in 88.6% of water, 98.7% of soil, and 95.7% of forage samples. Compared to the concentration (log CFU/g) of CRB in fecal samples (2.95, 95% CI: 2.89, 3.02), the concentration of CRB was higher (P < 0.001) in soil and forage samples (5.37, 95% CI: 5.16, 5.57) and lower (P < 0.001) in water samples (1.08, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.36). Soil microbiota from farms with high prevalence of CRB clustered closer together and the proportion of Phylum Proteobacteria was higher on farms with high prevalence of CRB resistance. Large farming operations were associated with a 58% higher likelihood of CRB detection in fecal samples. Regular cleaning of drinking troughs and the addition of ionophores to feed were associated with CRB reduction in fecal samples. Taken together, the widespread of CRB into both cattle seldom treated with cephalosporin antibiotics and the surrounding environment suggests the environment is a natural source of antimicrobial resistance in beef cattle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6374349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63743492019-02-21 High Prevalence of Cefotaxime Resistant Bacteria in Grazing Beef Cattle: A Cross Sectional Study Markland, Sarah Weppelmann, Thomas A. Ma, Zhengxin Lee, Shinyoung Mir, Raies A. Teng, Lin Ginn, Amber Lee, Choonghee Ukhanova, Maria Galindo, Sebastian Carr, Chad DiLorenzo, Nicolas Ahn, Soohyoun Mah, Jae-Hyung Kim, Hae-Yeong Mai, Volker Mobley, Ray Morris, J. Glenn Jeong, KwangCheol Casey Front Microbiol Microbiology Although the over-use of antibiotics during food animal production is a potential driver of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms (ARMs), a high prevalence of cefotaxime resistant bacteria (CRB) has been observed in grazing animals raised without antibiotic supplementation. In this cross-sectional study, the prevalence and concentration of CRB in beef cattle on grazing farms were investigated. Fecal samples from the recto-anal junction of cattle (n = 840) and environmental samples (n = 258) were collected from 17 farms in North and Central Florida in the United States, and a survey of farm characteristics, animal husbandry practices, and antibiotic usage was conducted. CRB were detected in fecal samples from 47.4% of all cattle, with the prevalence ranging from 21.1 to 87.5% on farms, and significantly higher (P < 0.001) in calves compared to adult cows (54.1 vs. 41.8%). Environmental samples had a higher prevalence than fecal samples (P < 0.001), with CRB detected in 88.6% of water, 98.7% of soil, and 95.7% of forage samples. Compared to the concentration (log CFU/g) of CRB in fecal samples (2.95, 95% CI: 2.89, 3.02), the concentration of CRB was higher (P < 0.001) in soil and forage samples (5.37, 95% CI: 5.16, 5.57) and lower (P < 0.001) in water samples (1.08, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.36). Soil microbiota from farms with high prevalence of CRB clustered closer together and the proportion of Phylum Proteobacteria was higher on farms with high prevalence of CRB resistance. Large farming operations were associated with a 58% higher likelihood of CRB detection in fecal samples. Regular cleaning of drinking troughs and the addition of ionophores to feed were associated with CRB reduction in fecal samples. Taken together, the widespread of CRB into both cattle seldom treated with cephalosporin antibiotics and the surrounding environment suggests the environment is a natural source of antimicrobial resistance in beef cattle. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6374349/ /pubmed/30792707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00176 Text en Copyright © 2019 Markland, Weppelmann, Ma, Lee, Mir, Teng, Ginn, Lee, Ukhanova, Galindo, Carr, DiLorenzo, Ahn, Mah, Kim, Mai, Mobley, Morris and Jeong. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Markland, Sarah
Weppelmann, Thomas A.
Ma, Zhengxin
Lee, Shinyoung
Mir, Raies A.
Teng, Lin
Ginn, Amber
Lee, Choonghee
Ukhanova, Maria
Galindo, Sebastian
Carr, Chad
DiLorenzo, Nicolas
Ahn, Soohyoun
Mah, Jae-Hyung
Kim, Hae-Yeong
Mai, Volker
Mobley, Ray
Morris, J. Glenn
Jeong, KwangCheol Casey
High Prevalence of Cefotaxime Resistant Bacteria in Grazing Beef Cattle: A Cross Sectional Study
title High Prevalence of Cefotaxime Resistant Bacteria in Grazing Beef Cattle: A Cross Sectional Study
title_full High Prevalence of Cefotaxime Resistant Bacteria in Grazing Beef Cattle: A Cross Sectional Study
title_fullStr High Prevalence of Cefotaxime Resistant Bacteria in Grazing Beef Cattle: A Cross Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed High Prevalence of Cefotaxime Resistant Bacteria in Grazing Beef Cattle: A Cross Sectional Study
title_short High Prevalence of Cefotaxime Resistant Bacteria in Grazing Beef Cattle: A Cross Sectional Study
title_sort high prevalence of cefotaxime resistant bacteria in grazing beef cattle: a cross sectional study
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792707
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00176
work_keys_str_mv AT marklandsarah highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT weppelmannthomasa highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT mazhengxin highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT leeshinyoung highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT mirraiesa highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT tenglin highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT ginnamber highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT leechoonghee highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT ukhanovamaria highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT galindosebastian highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT carrchad highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT dilorenzonicolas highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT ahnsoohyoun highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT mahjaehyung highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT kimhaeyeong highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT maivolker highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT mobleyray highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT morrisjglenn highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy
AT jeongkwangcheolcasey highprevalenceofcefotaximeresistantbacteriaingrazingbeefcattleacrosssectionalstudy