Cargando…

How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior?

Navigation systems are ubiquitous tools to assist wayfinders of the mobile information society with various navigational tasks. Whenever such systems assist with self-localization and path planning, they reduce human effort for navigating. Automated navigation assistance benefits navigation performa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brügger, Annina, Richter, Kai-Florian, Fabrikant, Sara Irina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30758681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0156-5
_version_ 1783395164780232704
author Brügger, Annina
Richter, Kai-Florian
Fabrikant, Sara Irina
author_facet Brügger, Annina
Richter, Kai-Florian
Fabrikant, Sara Irina
author_sort Brügger, Annina
collection PubMed
description Navigation systems are ubiquitous tools to assist wayfinders of the mobile information society with various navigational tasks. Whenever such systems assist with self-localization and path planning, they reduce human effort for navigating. Automated navigation assistance benefits navigation performance, but research seems to show that it negatively affects attention to environment properties, spatial knowledge acquisition, and retention of spatial information. Very little is known about how to design navigation systems for pedestrian navigation that increase both navigation performance and spatial knowledge acquisition. To this end, we empirically tested participants (N = 64) using four different navigation system behaviors (between-subject design). Two cognitive processes with varying levels of automation, self-localization and allocation of attention, define navigation system behaviors: either the system automatically executes one of the processes (high level of automation), or the system leaves the decision of when and where to execute the process to the navigator (low level of automation). In two experimental phases, we applied a novel empirical framework for evaluating spatial knowledge acquisition in a real-world outdoor urban environment. First, participants followed a route assisted by a navigation system and, simultaneously, incidentally acquired spatial knowledge. Second, participants reversed the route using the spatial knowledge acquired during the assisted phase, this time without the aid of the navigation system. Results of the route-following phase did not reveal differences in navigation performance across groups using different navigation system behaviors. However, participants using systems with higher levels of automation seemed not to acquire enough spatial knowledge to reverse the route without navigation errors. Furthermore, employing novel methods to analyze mobile eye tracking data revealed distinct patterns of human gaze behavior over time and space. We thus can demonstrate how to increase spatial knowledge acquisition without harming navigation performance when using navigation systems, and how to influence human navigation behavior with varying navigation system behavior. Thus, we provide key findings for the design of intelligent automated navigation systems in real-world scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6374493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63744932019-03-04 How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior? Brügger, Annina Richter, Kai-Florian Fabrikant, Sara Irina Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article Navigation systems are ubiquitous tools to assist wayfinders of the mobile information society with various navigational tasks. Whenever such systems assist with self-localization and path planning, they reduce human effort for navigating. Automated navigation assistance benefits navigation performance, but research seems to show that it negatively affects attention to environment properties, spatial knowledge acquisition, and retention of spatial information. Very little is known about how to design navigation systems for pedestrian navigation that increase both navigation performance and spatial knowledge acquisition. To this end, we empirically tested participants (N = 64) using four different navigation system behaviors (between-subject design). Two cognitive processes with varying levels of automation, self-localization and allocation of attention, define navigation system behaviors: either the system automatically executes one of the processes (high level of automation), or the system leaves the decision of when and where to execute the process to the navigator (low level of automation). In two experimental phases, we applied a novel empirical framework for evaluating spatial knowledge acquisition in a real-world outdoor urban environment. First, participants followed a route assisted by a navigation system and, simultaneously, incidentally acquired spatial knowledge. Second, participants reversed the route using the spatial knowledge acquired during the assisted phase, this time without the aid of the navigation system. Results of the route-following phase did not reveal differences in navigation performance across groups using different navigation system behaviors. However, participants using systems with higher levels of automation seemed not to acquire enough spatial knowledge to reverse the route without navigation errors. Furthermore, employing novel methods to analyze mobile eye tracking data revealed distinct patterns of human gaze behavior over time and space. We thus can demonstrate how to increase spatial knowledge acquisition without harming navigation performance when using navigation systems, and how to influence human navigation behavior with varying navigation system behavior. Thus, we provide key findings for the design of intelligent automated navigation systems in real-world scenarios. Springer International Publishing 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6374493/ /pubmed/30758681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0156-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Brügger, Annina
Richter, Kai-Florian
Fabrikant, Sara Irina
How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior?
title How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior?
title_full How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior?
title_fullStr How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior?
title_full_unstemmed How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior?
title_short How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior?
title_sort how does navigation system behavior influence human behavior?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30758681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0156-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bruggerannina howdoesnavigationsystembehaviorinfluencehumanbehavior
AT richterkaiflorian howdoesnavigationsystembehaviorinfluencehumanbehavior
AT fabrikantsarairina howdoesnavigationsystembehaviorinfluencehumanbehavior