Cargando…

The “cholesterol paradox” among inpatients – retrospective analysis of medical documentation

INTRODUCTION: There is evidence of positive relationships between cholesterol concentration and risk of cardiovascular diseases. However, higher mortality in patients with a low cholesterol level has been reported (the “cholesterol paradox”). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of 34 191 inpatient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budzyński, Jacek, Tojek, Krzysztof, Wustrau, Beata, Czerniak, Beata, Winiarski, Piotr, Korzycka-Wilińska, Wanda, Banaszkiewicz, Zbigniew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775589
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/amsad.2018.74736
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: There is evidence of positive relationships between cholesterol concentration and risk of cardiovascular diseases. However, higher mortality in patients with a low cholesterol level has been reported (the “cholesterol paradox”). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of 34 191 inpatients between 2014 and 2016 were reviewed and the relationships between total (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) cholesterol and triglyceride blood concentrations and all-cause in-hospital death and readmission within 14 and 30 days and 1 year were determined in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Patients with TC in the lower quartile and LDL-C < 70 mg/dl had greater risk of the outcomes measured than individuals with a TC level in the remaining quartiles and LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl. Moreover, patients with TC in the highest quartile, OR (95% CI): 0.36 (0.13–0.99), p < 0.05, and LDL-C ≥ 115 mg/dl, OR (95% CI): 0.53 (0.37–0.77), p < 0.05, had the lowest all-cause in-hospital mortality. However, multivariate analysis using logistic regression and a Cox proportional hazard model showed no significant influence of blood lipid levels on the occurrence of the outcomes measured. CONCLUSIONS: A significant effect of a “cholesterol paradox” linking better prognosis with higher blood lipid concentration was found only in univariate analysis but, after adjustment for clinical characteristics in multivariate analysis, the plasma lipid level had a neutral influence on the occurrence of the measured outcomes. This suggests that a low cholesterol level should be interpreted as a biomarker of illness severity.