Cargando…
A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus–reward associations
Successful adaptive behavior requires the learning of associations between stimulus-specific choices and rewarding outcomes. Most research on the mechanisms underlying such processes has focused on subcortical reward-processing regions, in conjunction with frontal circuits. Given the extensive stimu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30576533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy116 |
_version_ | 1783395195898822656 |
---|---|
author | van den Berg, Berry Geib, Benjamin R San Martín, Rene Woldorff, Marty G |
author_facet | van den Berg, Berry Geib, Benjamin R San Martín, Rene Woldorff, Marty G |
author_sort | van den Berg, Berry |
collection | PubMed |
description | Successful adaptive behavior requires the learning of associations between stimulus-specific choices and rewarding outcomes. Most research on the mechanisms underlying such processes has focused on subcortical reward-processing regions, in conjunction with frontal circuits. Given the extensive stimulus-specific coding in the sensory cortices, we hypothesized they would play a key role in the learning of stimulus-specific reward associations. We recorded electrical brain activity (using electroencephalogram) during a learning-based decision-making gambling task where, on each trial, participants chose between a face and a house and then received feedback (gain or loss). Within each 20-trial set, either faces or houses were more likely to predict a gain. Results showed that early feedback processing (~200–1200 ms) was independent of the choice made. In contrast, later feedback processing (~1400–1800 ms) was stimulus-specific, reflected by decreased alpha power (reflecting increased cortical activity) over face-selective regions, for winning-vs-losing after a face choice but not after a house choice. Finally, as the reward association was learned in a set, there was an increasingly stronger attentional bias towards the more likely winning stimulus, reflected by increasing attentional orienting–related brain activity and increasing likelihood of choosing that stimulus. These results delineate the processes underlying the updating of stimulus–reward associations during feedback-guided learning, which then guide future attentional allocation and decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6374612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63746122019-02-21 A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus–reward associations van den Berg, Berry Geib, Benjamin R San Martín, Rene Woldorff, Marty G Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Article Successful adaptive behavior requires the learning of associations between stimulus-specific choices and rewarding outcomes. Most research on the mechanisms underlying such processes has focused on subcortical reward-processing regions, in conjunction with frontal circuits. Given the extensive stimulus-specific coding in the sensory cortices, we hypothesized they would play a key role in the learning of stimulus-specific reward associations. We recorded electrical brain activity (using electroencephalogram) during a learning-based decision-making gambling task where, on each trial, participants chose between a face and a house and then received feedback (gain or loss). Within each 20-trial set, either faces or houses were more likely to predict a gain. Results showed that early feedback processing (~200–1200 ms) was independent of the choice made. In contrast, later feedback processing (~1400–1800 ms) was stimulus-specific, reflected by decreased alpha power (reflecting increased cortical activity) over face-selective regions, for winning-vs-losing after a face choice but not after a house choice. Finally, as the reward association was learned in a set, there was an increasingly stronger attentional bias towards the more likely winning stimulus, reflected by increasing attentional orienting–related brain activity and increasing likelihood of choosing that stimulus. These results delineate the processes underlying the updating of stimulus–reward associations during feedback-guided learning, which then guide future attentional allocation and decision-making. Oxford University Press 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6374612/ /pubmed/30576533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy116 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article van den Berg, Berry Geib, Benjamin R San Martín, Rene Woldorff, Marty G A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus–reward associations |
title | A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus–reward associations |
title_full | A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus–reward associations |
title_fullStr | A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus–reward associations |
title_full_unstemmed | A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus–reward associations |
title_short | A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus–reward associations |
title_sort | key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus–reward associations |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30576533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbergberry akeyroleforstimulusspecificupdatingofthesensorycorticesinthelearningofstimulusrewardassociations AT geibbenjaminr akeyroleforstimulusspecificupdatingofthesensorycorticesinthelearningofstimulusrewardassociations AT sanmartinrene akeyroleforstimulusspecificupdatingofthesensorycorticesinthelearningofstimulusrewardassociations AT woldorffmartyg akeyroleforstimulusspecificupdatingofthesensorycorticesinthelearningofstimulusrewardassociations AT vandenbergberry keyroleforstimulusspecificupdatingofthesensorycorticesinthelearningofstimulusrewardassociations AT geibbenjaminr keyroleforstimulusspecificupdatingofthesensorycorticesinthelearningofstimulusrewardassociations AT sanmartinrene keyroleforstimulusspecificupdatingofthesensorycorticesinthelearningofstimulusrewardassociations AT woldorffmartyg keyroleforstimulusspecificupdatingofthesensorycorticesinthelearningofstimulusrewardassociations |