Cargando…
COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials
BACKGROUND: Discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes are an important and prevalent source of bias in clinical trials. COMPare (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Outcome Monitoring Project) monitored all trials in five leading journals for correct outcome reporting, submitted corre...
Autores principales: | Goldacre, Ben, Drysdale, Henry, Marston, Cicely, Mahtani, Kamal R., Dale, Aaron, Milosevic, Ioan, Slade, Eirion, Hartley, Philip, Heneghan, Carl |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6374909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3172-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
por: Goldacre, Ben, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients
por: Heneghan, Carl, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Misreporting of Energy Intake in the 2007 Australian Children’s Survey: Identification, Characteristics and Impact of Misreporters
por: Rangan, Anna M., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Misreported Cancer Deaths in PLATO Trial
por: Serebruany, Victor, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process
por: Heneghan, Carl J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)