Cargando…
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
BACKGROUND: Discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes are an important source of bias in trials. Despite legislation, guidelines and public commitments on correct reporting from journals, outcome misreporting continues to be prevalent. We aimed to document the extent of misreporting,...
Autores principales: | Goldacre, Ben, Drysdale, Henry, Dale, Aaron, Milosevic, Ioan, Slade, Eirion, Hartley, Philip, Marston, Cicely, Powell-Smith, Anna, Heneghan, Carl, Mahtani, Kamal R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3173-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials
por: Goldacre, Ben, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients
por: Heneghan, Carl, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Misreporting of Energy Intake in the 2007 Australian Children’s Survey: Identification, Characteristics and Impact of Misreporters
por: Rangan, Anna M., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process
por: Heneghan, Carl J, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Misreported Cancer Deaths in PLATO Trial
por: Serebruany, Victor, et al.
Publicado: (2021)