Cargando…

Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Interleukin-6 (IL-6) could be a faster indicator of treatment success in adults with severe sepsis and septic shock compared to procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: Data from adult patients with severe sepsis and septic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weidhase, Lorenz, Wellhöfer, Daniel, Schulze, Gero, Kaiser, Thorsten, Drogies, Tim, Wurst, Ulrike, Petros, Sirak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3800-2
_version_ 1783395316347699200
author Weidhase, Lorenz
Wellhöfer, Daniel
Schulze, Gero
Kaiser, Thorsten
Drogies, Tim
Wurst, Ulrike
Petros, Sirak
author_facet Weidhase, Lorenz
Wellhöfer, Daniel
Schulze, Gero
Kaiser, Thorsten
Drogies, Tim
Wurst, Ulrike
Petros, Sirak
author_sort Weidhase, Lorenz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Interleukin-6 (IL-6) could be a faster indicator of treatment success in adults with severe sepsis and septic shock compared to procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: Data from adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock managed at the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital Leipzig between September 2009 and January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Values for CRP, PCT and IL-6 on admission as well as after 24 and 48–72 h were collected. Antibiotic therapy was defined as clinically successful if the patient survived ICU stay. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock with adequate data quality were included. After 48–72 h, the median IL-6 was significantly lower in survivors than in non-survivors (114.2 pg/ml vs. 746.6 pg/ml; p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference for PCT (5.6 vs. 4.9 ng/ml; p = 0.586) and CRP (158.5 mg/l vs. 172.4 mg/l; p = 0.988). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that IL-6 is better than PCT and CRP in predicting the treatment success in predominantly non-surgical sepsis in the first 48–72 h.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6375140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63751402019-02-26 Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults Weidhase, Lorenz Wellhöfer, Daniel Schulze, Gero Kaiser, Thorsten Drogies, Tim Wurst, Ulrike Petros, Sirak BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Interleukin-6 (IL-6) could be a faster indicator of treatment success in adults with severe sepsis and septic shock compared to procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: Data from adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock managed at the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital Leipzig between September 2009 and January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Values for CRP, PCT and IL-6 on admission as well as after 24 and 48–72 h were collected. Antibiotic therapy was defined as clinically successful if the patient survived ICU stay. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock with adequate data quality were included. After 48–72 h, the median IL-6 was significantly lower in survivors than in non-survivors (114.2 pg/ml vs. 746.6 pg/ml; p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference for PCT (5.6 vs. 4.9 ng/ml; p = 0.586) and CRP (158.5 mg/l vs. 172.4 mg/l; p = 0.988). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that IL-6 is better than PCT and CRP in predicting the treatment success in predominantly non-surgical sepsis in the first 48–72 h. BioMed Central 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6375140/ /pubmed/30760225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3800-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weidhase, Lorenz
Wellhöfer, Daniel
Schulze, Gero
Kaiser, Thorsten
Drogies, Tim
Wurst, Ulrike
Petros, Sirak
Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults
title Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults
title_full Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults
title_fullStr Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults
title_full_unstemmed Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults
title_short Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults
title_sort is interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and c-reactive protein? a single center study in critically ill adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3800-2
work_keys_str_mv AT weidhaselorenz isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults
AT wellhoferdaniel isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults
AT schulzegero isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults
AT kaiserthorsten isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults
AT drogiestim isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults
AT wurstulrike isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults
AT petrossirak isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults