Cargando…
Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Interleukin-6 (IL-6) could be a faster indicator of treatment success in adults with severe sepsis and septic shock compared to procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: Data from adult patients with severe sepsis and septic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3800-2 |
_version_ | 1783395316347699200 |
---|---|
author | Weidhase, Lorenz Wellhöfer, Daniel Schulze, Gero Kaiser, Thorsten Drogies, Tim Wurst, Ulrike Petros, Sirak |
author_facet | Weidhase, Lorenz Wellhöfer, Daniel Schulze, Gero Kaiser, Thorsten Drogies, Tim Wurst, Ulrike Petros, Sirak |
author_sort | Weidhase, Lorenz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Interleukin-6 (IL-6) could be a faster indicator of treatment success in adults with severe sepsis and septic shock compared to procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: Data from adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock managed at the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital Leipzig between September 2009 and January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Values for CRP, PCT and IL-6 on admission as well as after 24 and 48–72 h were collected. Antibiotic therapy was defined as clinically successful if the patient survived ICU stay. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock with adequate data quality were included. After 48–72 h, the median IL-6 was significantly lower in survivors than in non-survivors (114.2 pg/ml vs. 746.6 pg/ml; p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference for PCT (5.6 vs. 4.9 ng/ml; p = 0.586) and CRP (158.5 mg/l vs. 172.4 mg/l; p = 0.988). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that IL-6 is better than PCT and CRP in predicting the treatment success in predominantly non-surgical sepsis in the first 48–72 h. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6375140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63751402019-02-26 Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults Weidhase, Lorenz Wellhöfer, Daniel Schulze, Gero Kaiser, Thorsten Drogies, Tim Wurst, Ulrike Petros, Sirak BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Interleukin-6 (IL-6) could be a faster indicator of treatment success in adults with severe sepsis and septic shock compared to procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: Data from adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock managed at the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital Leipzig between September 2009 and January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Values for CRP, PCT and IL-6 on admission as well as after 24 and 48–72 h were collected. Antibiotic therapy was defined as clinically successful if the patient survived ICU stay. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock with adequate data quality were included. After 48–72 h, the median IL-6 was significantly lower in survivors than in non-survivors (114.2 pg/ml vs. 746.6 pg/ml; p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference for PCT (5.6 vs. 4.9 ng/ml; p = 0.586) and CRP (158.5 mg/l vs. 172.4 mg/l; p = 0.988). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that IL-6 is better than PCT and CRP in predicting the treatment success in predominantly non-surgical sepsis in the first 48–72 h. BioMed Central 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6375140/ /pubmed/30760225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3800-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Weidhase, Lorenz Wellhöfer, Daniel Schulze, Gero Kaiser, Thorsten Drogies, Tim Wurst, Ulrike Petros, Sirak Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults |
title | Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults |
title_full | Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults |
title_fullStr | Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults |
title_short | Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults |
title_sort | is interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and c-reactive protein? a single center study in critically ill adults |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3800-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weidhaselorenz isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults AT wellhoferdaniel isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults AT schulzegero isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults AT kaiserthorsten isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults AT drogiestim isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults AT wurstulrike isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults AT petrossirak isinterleukin6abetterpredictorofsuccessfulantibiotictherapythanprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasinglecenterstudyincriticallyilladults |