Cargando…

High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: High-throughput non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal Rhesus D (RhD) status could avoid unnecessary treatment with anti-D immunoglobulin for RhD-negative women found to be carrying an RhD-negative fetus. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of high-throughput NIPT for feta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Huiqin, Llewellyn, Alexis, Walker, Ruth, Harden, Melissa, Saramago, Pedro, Griffin, Susan, Simmonds, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1254-4
_version_ 1783395330260205568
author Yang, Huiqin
Llewellyn, Alexis
Walker, Ruth
Harden, Melissa
Saramago, Pedro
Griffin, Susan
Simmonds, Mark
author_facet Yang, Huiqin
Llewellyn, Alexis
Walker, Ruth
Harden, Melissa
Saramago, Pedro
Griffin, Susan
Simmonds, Mark
author_sort Yang, Huiqin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-throughput non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal Rhesus D (RhD) status could avoid unnecessary treatment with anti-D immunoglobulin for RhD-negative women found to be carrying an RhD-negative fetus. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of high-throughput NIPT for fetal RhD status in RhD-negative women not known to be sensitized to the RhD antigen, by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Prospective cohort studies of high-throughput NIPT used to determine fetal RhD status were included. The eligible population were pregnant women who were RhD negative and not known to be sensitized to RhD antigen. The index test was high-throughput, NIPT cell-free fetal DNA tests of maternal plasma used to determine fetal RhD status. The reference standard considered was serologic cord blood testing at birth. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index were searched up to February 2016. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full texts identified as potentially relevant. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. The bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic (HSROC) models were fitted to calculate summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, false positive and false negative rates, and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 3921 references records were identified through electronic searches. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. Six studies were judged to be at low risk of bias. The HSROC models demonstrated high diagnostic performance of high-throughput NIPT testing for women tested at or after 11 weeks gestation. In the primary analysis for diagnostic accuracy, women with an inconclusive test result were treated as having tested positive. The false negative rate (incorrectly classed as RhD negative) was 0.34% (95% CI 0.15 to 0.76) and the false positive rate (incorrectly classed as RhD positive) was 3.86% (95% CI 2.54 to 5.82). There was limited evidence for non-white women and multiple pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: High-throughput NIPT is sufficiently accurate to detect fetal RhD status in RhD-negative women and would considerably reduce unnecessary treatment with routine anti-D immunoglobulin. The applicability of these findings to non-white women and women with multiple pregnancies is uncertain. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1254-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6375191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63751912019-02-26 High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yang, Huiqin Llewellyn, Alexis Walker, Ruth Harden, Melissa Saramago, Pedro Griffin, Susan Simmonds, Mark BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: High-throughput non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal Rhesus D (RhD) status could avoid unnecessary treatment with anti-D immunoglobulin for RhD-negative women found to be carrying an RhD-negative fetus. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of high-throughput NIPT for fetal RhD status in RhD-negative women not known to be sensitized to the RhD antigen, by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Prospective cohort studies of high-throughput NIPT used to determine fetal RhD status were included. The eligible population were pregnant women who were RhD negative and not known to be sensitized to RhD antigen. The index test was high-throughput, NIPT cell-free fetal DNA tests of maternal plasma used to determine fetal RhD status. The reference standard considered was serologic cord blood testing at birth. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index were searched up to February 2016. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full texts identified as potentially relevant. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. The bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic (HSROC) models were fitted to calculate summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, false positive and false negative rates, and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 3921 references records were identified through electronic searches. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. Six studies were judged to be at low risk of bias. The HSROC models demonstrated high diagnostic performance of high-throughput NIPT testing for women tested at or after 11 weeks gestation. In the primary analysis for diagnostic accuracy, women with an inconclusive test result were treated as having tested positive. The false negative rate (incorrectly classed as RhD negative) was 0.34% (95% CI 0.15 to 0.76) and the false positive rate (incorrectly classed as RhD positive) was 3.86% (95% CI 2.54 to 5.82). There was limited evidence for non-white women and multiple pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: High-throughput NIPT is sufficiently accurate to detect fetal RhD status in RhD-negative women and would considerably reduce unnecessary treatment with routine anti-D immunoglobulin. The applicability of these findings to non-white women and women with multiple pregnancies is uncertain. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1254-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6375191/ /pubmed/30760268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1254-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Huiqin
Llewellyn, Alexis
Walker, Ruth
Harden, Melissa
Saramago, Pedro
Griffin, Susan
Simmonds, Mark
High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort high-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus d status in rhd-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1254-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghuiqin highthroughputnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalrhesusdstatusinrhdnegativewomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT llewellynalexis highthroughputnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalrhesusdstatusinrhdnegativewomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT walkerruth highthroughputnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalrhesusdstatusinrhdnegativewomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hardenmelissa highthroughputnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalrhesusdstatusinrhdnegativewomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saramagopedro highthroughputnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalrhesusdstatusinrhdnegativewomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT griffinsusan highthroughputnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalrhesusdstatusinrhdnegativewomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT simmondsmark highthroughputnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalrhesusdstatusinrhdnegativewomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis