Cargando…

Discordant financial conflicts of interest disclosures between clinical trial conference abstract and subsequent publication

BACKGROUND: Financial conflicts of interest (FCOI) are known to be prevalent in medicine. Authorship of pivotal trials reap non-financial benefits including publication productivity that can be used for assessment of tenure positions and promotion. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiss, Glen J., Davis, Roger B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775185
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6423
_version_ 1783395345615552512
author Weiss, Glen J.
Davis, Roger B.
author_facet Weiss, Glen J.
Davis, Roger B.
author_sort Weiss, Glen J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Financial conflicts of interest (FCOI) are known to be prevalent in medicine. Authorship of pivotal trials reap non-financial benefits including publication productivity that can be used for assessment of tenure positions and promotion. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the prevalence and discordance of academic trial author (authors) FCOI in industry-sponsored drug trials that were initially presented as oral abstracts and subsequently resulted in a peer-reviewed publication. METHODS: Oral abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2017 Annual Meeting that were subsequently published were identified. Studies that were non-industry sponsored, non-adult, or non-therapeutic trials were excluded. Studies that did not have a subsequent peer-reviewed publication or had a publication preceding the ASCO 2017 Annual Meeting were also excluded. FCOI was categorized and impact factor (IF) for the journal at the time of publication was retrieved. FCOI discordance between the oral abstract and publication was calculated based on geographic location and IF. RESULTS: A total of 22 paired abstract and publications met inclusion criteria for further analysis. A total of 384 authors were identified, of these 280 authors (74.1%) were included in both the oral abstract and subsequent publication. A total of 76% of these 280 authors had FCOI and 66.4% had FCOI discordance. There were statistically significant differences for the sum of FCOI discordance for U.S.-based authors (p = 0.0004) but not for journal IF. When analyzing the sum of absolute differences of FCOI discordance, statistical significance was reached for authors from any of the three geographic regions, as well as, low and high IF journals (all p-values < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study draws attention to the lack of uniformity and vetting of FCOI reporting in abstracts and journals publishing solid tumor oncology trial results. This is particularly concerning, since FCOI is prevalent globally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6375255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63752552019-02-15 Discordant financial conflicts of interest disclosures between clinical trial conference abstract and subsequent publication Weiss, Glen J. Davis, Roger B. PeerJ Clinical Trials BACKGROUND: Financial conflicts of interest (FCOI) are known to be prevalent in medicine. Authorship of pivotal trials reap non-financial benefits including publication productivity that can be used for assessment of tenure positions and promotion. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the prevalence and discordance of academic trial author (authors) FCOI in industry-sponsored drug trials that were initially presented as oral abstracts and subsequently resulted in a peer-reviewed publication. METHODS: Oral abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2017 Annual Meeting that were subsequently published were identified. Studies that were non-industry sponsored, non-adult, or non-therapeutic trials were excluded. Studies that did not have a subsequent peer-reviewed publication or had a publication preceding the ASCO 2017 Annual Meeting were also excluded. FCOI was categorized and impact factor (IF) for the journal at the time of publication was retrieved. FCOI discordance between the oral abstract and publication was calculated based on geographic location and IF. RESULTS: A total of 22 paired abstract and publications met inclusion criteria for further analysis. A total of 384 authors were identified, of these 280 authors (74.1%) were included in both the oral abstract and subsequent publication. A total of 76% of these 280 authors had FCOI and 66.4% had FCOI discordance. There were statistically significant differences for the sum of FCOI discordance for U.S.-based authors (p = 0.0004) but not for journal IF. When analyzing the sum of absolute differences of FCOI discordance, statistical significance was reached for authors from any of the three geographic regions, as well as, low and high IF journals (all p-values < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study draws attention to the lack of uniformity and vetting of FCOI reporting in abstracts and journals publishing solid tumor oncology trial results. This is particularly concerning, since FCOI is prevalent globally. PeerJ Inc. 2019-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6375255/ /pubmed/30775185 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6423 Text en © 2019 Weiss and Davis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials
Weiss, Glen J.
Davis, Roger B.
Discordant financial conflicts of interest disclosures between clinical trial conference abstract and subsequent publication
title Discordant financial conflicts of interest disclosures between clinical trial conference abstract and subsequent publication
title_full Discordant financial conflicts of interest disclosures between clinical trial conference abstract and subsequent publication
title_fullStr Discordant financial conflicts of interest disclosures between clinical trial conference abstract and subsequent publication
title_full_unstemmed Discordant financial conflicts of interest disclosures between clinical trial conference abstract and subsequent publication
title_short Discordant financial conflicts of interest disclosures between clinical trial conference abstract and subsequent publication
title_sort discordant financial conflicts of interest disclosures between clinical trial conference abstract and subsequent publication
topic Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775185
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6423
work_keys_str_mv AT weissglenj discordantfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbetweenclinicaltrialconferenceabstractandsubsequentpublication
AT davisrogerb discordantfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbetweenclinicaltrialconferenceabstractandsubsequentpublication