Cargando…
Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience
BACKGROUND: Reporting quality of systematic reviews’ (SRs) abstracts is important because this is often the only information about a study that readers have. The aim of this study was to assess adherence of SR abstracts in the field of anesthesiology with the reporting checklist PRISMA extension for...
Autores principales: | Maticic, Katarina, Krnic Martinic, Marina, Puljak, Livia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6376734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30764774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0675-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks
por: Krnic Martinic, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study
por: Krnic Martinic, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Assessing abstracts of Iranian systematic reviews and metaanalysis indexed in WOS and Scopus using PRISMA
por: Kazerani, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
por: Beller, Elaine M., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Inter-rater and test–retest reliability of quality assessments by
novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle–Ottawa
Scales
por: Oremus, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2012)