Cargando…

Randomized clinical trials with run-in periods: frequency, characteristics and reporting

BACKGROUND: Run-in periods are occasionally used in randomized clinical trials to exclude patients after inclusion, but before randomization. In theory, run-in periods increase the probability of detecting a potential treatment effect, at the cost of possibly affecting external and internal validity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Laursen, David Ruben Teindl, Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand, Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:	Original Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809104 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S188752

Ejemplares similares

Mechanisms and direction of allocation bias in randomised clinical trials
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study
por: Moustgaard, Helene, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting of harms in oncological clinical study reports submitted to the European Medicines Agency compared to trial registries and publications—a methodological review
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger S., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Considering the methodological limitations in the evidence base of antidepressants for depression: a reanalysis of a network meta-analysis
por: Munkholm, Klaus, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Do protocols for new randomised trials take previous similar trials into account? Cohort study of contemporary trial protocols
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Protocol: Benefits and harms of remdesivir for COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention
por: Krogsbøll, Lasse Theis, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Hand cleaning with ash for reducing the spread of viral and bacterial infections: a rapid review
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups
por: Madsen, Matias Vested, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

The matching quality of experimental and control interventions in blinded pharmacological randomised clinical trials: a methodological systematic review
por: Bello, Segun, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Benefits and harms in clinical trials of duloxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of clinical study reports, trial registries, and publications
por: Maund, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Are investigators’ access to trial data and rights to publish restricted and are potential trial participants informed about this? A comparison of trial protocols and informed consent materials
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger S., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Coding of adverse events of suicidality in clinical study reports of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: descriptive study
por: Maund, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Conflicts of Interest at Medical Journals: The Influence of Industry-Supported Randomised Trials on Journal Impact Factors and Revenue – Cohort Study
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Correction: Conflicts of Interest at Medical Journals: The Influence of Industry-Supported Randomised Trials on Journal Impact Factors and Revenue – Cohort Study
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Influence and management of conflicts of interest in randomised clinical trials: qualitative interview study
por: Østengaard, Lasse, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Ghost Authorship in Industry-Initiated Randomised Trials
por: Gøtzsche, Peter C, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Divine intervention? A Cochrane review on intercessory prayer gone beyond science and reason
por: Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Run-Reversal Equilibrium for Clinical Trial Randomization
por: Grant, William C.
Publicado: (2015)

Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic review
por: Nejstgaard, Camilla H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effect of a Run‐In Period on Estimated Treatment Effects in Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trials: A Meta‐Analytic Review
por: Murphy, Robert P., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Locking plate osteosynthesis in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus: A systematic review of benefits and harms
por: Brorson, Stig, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Conflict of Interest Policies at Medical Schools and Teaching Hospitals: A Systematic Review of Cross-sectional Studies
por: Fabbri, Alice, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effect of osteosynthesis, primary hemiarthroplasty, and non-surgical management for displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly: a multi-centre, randomised clinical trial
por: Brorson, Stig, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Non-surgical interventions for excessive anterior pelvic tilt in symptomatic and non-symptomatic adults: a systematic review
por: Falk Brekke, Anders, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials?
por: Rathod, Trishna, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Random-Walk Laplacian for Frequency Analysis in Periodic Graphs
por: Boukrab, Rachid, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Periodicity in Background Rates (Physics Runs in Period 7)
por: O'Hanlon, H
Publicado: (1973)

Meningioma animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Andersen, Mikkel Schou, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The design of the run Clever randomized trial: running volume, −intensity and running-related injuries
por: Ramskov, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain
por: Olsen, Mette Frahm, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Physics Run Analysis No. 3, 1080, run 1154 to run 1167 - Period 7
por: Verbeeck, T
Publicado: (1981)

Run‐in periods and clinical outcomes of antipsychotics in dementia: A meta‐epidemiological study of placebo‐controlled trials
por: Hulshof, Tessa A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_3u3jdabumdn8b949aaiv4toor8