Cargando…

Does lipidomic serum analysis support the assessment of digestive efficiency in chickens?

The increasing cost of conventional feedstuffs used in poultry diets has bolstered interest in genetic selection for digestive efficiency (DE) to improve the adaptation of the birds to various alternative feedstuffs. However, DE measurement through AMEn is time-consuming and constraining. To simplif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beauclercq, Stéphane, Lefèvre, Antoine, Nadal-Desbarats, Lydie, Germain, Karine, Praud, Christophe, Emond, Patrick, Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth Le, Mignon-Grasteau, Sandrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Poultry Science Association, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325459
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey483
_version_ 1783395741078650880
author Beauclercq, Stéphane
Lefèvre, Antoine
Nadal-Desbarats, Lydie
Germain, Karine
Praud, Christophe
Emond, Patrick
Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth Le
Mignon-Grasteau, Sandrine
author_facet Beauclercq, Stéphane
Lefèvre, Antoine
Nadal-Desbarats, Lydie
Germain, Karine
Praud, Christophe
Emond, Patrick
Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth Le
Mignon-Grasteau, Sandrine
author_sort Beauclercq, Stéphane
collection PubMed
description The increasing cost of conventional feedstuffs used in poultry diets has bolstered interest in genetic selection for digestive efficiency (DE) to improve the adaptation of the birds to various alternative feedstuffs. However, DE measurement through AMEn is time-consuming and constraining. To simplify selection for DE, the potential of serum composition to predict AMEn was evaluated based on 40 birds from two broiler lines (D+ and D−) divergently selected on the fecal AMEn of a difficult-to-digest wheat-based diet. Differences in serum coloration were suspected between the two lines, and thus a spectrophotometric analysis was carried out, revealing a significant difference in absorption between 430 nm and 516 nm, corresponding to the signature of orange–red lipophilic pigments such as xanthophylls. To go further, the liposoluble fraction of the serum was explored for its lipidome by mass spectrometry. Discriminant analysis revealed that a pattern of 10 metabolites, including zeaxanthin/lutein, can explain 82% of the lipidomic differences between the two lines. Colorimetry combined with lipidomics studies confirmed the relationship between digestive efficiency and serum composition, which opens up new possibilities for using it as a quick and easy proxy of digestive efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6377433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Poultry Science Association, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63774332019-02-21 Does lipidomic serum analysis support the assessment of digestive efficiency in chickens? Beauclercq, Stéphane Lefèvre, Antoine Nadal-Desbarats, Lydie Germain, Karine Praud, Christophe Emond, Patrick Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth Le Mignon-Grasteau, Sandrine Poult Sci Metabolism and Nutrition The increasing cost of conventional feedstuffs used in poultry diets has bolstered interest in genetic selection for digestive efficiency (DE) to improve the adaptation of the birds to various alternative feedstuffs. However, DE measurement through AMEn is time-consuming and constraining. To simplify selection for DE, the potential of serum composition to predict AMEn was evaluated based on 40 birds from two broiler lines (D+ and D−) divergently selected on the fecal AMEn of a difficult-to-digest wheat-based diet. Differences in serum coloration were suspected between the two lines, and thus a spectrophotometric analysis was carried out, revealing a significant difference in absorption between 430 nm and 516 nm, corresponding to the signature of orange–red lipophilic pigments such as xanthophylls. To go further, the liposoluble fraction of the serum was explored for its lipidome by mass spectrometry. Discriminant analysis revealed that a pattern of 10 metabolites, including zeaxanthin/lutein, can explain 82% of the lipidomic differences between the two lines. Colorimetry combined with lipidomics studies confirmed the relationship between digestive efficiency and serum composition, which opens up new possibilities for using it as a quick and easy proxy of digestive efficiency. Poultry Science Association, Inc. 2019-03 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6377433/ /pubmed/30325459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey483 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Metabolism and Nutrition
Beauclercq, Stéphane
Lefèvre, Antoine
Nadal-Desbarats, Lydie
Germain, Karine
Praud, Christophe
Emond, Patrick
Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth Le
Mignon-Grasteau, Sandrine
Does lipidomic serum analysis support the assessment of digestive efficiency in chickens?
title Does lipidomic serum analysis support the assessment of digestive efficiency in chickens?
title_full Does lipidomic serum analysis support the assessment of digestive efficiency in chickens?
title_fullStr Does lipidomic serum analysis support the assessment of digestive efficiency in chickens?
title_full_unstemmed Does lipidomic serum analysis support the assessment of digestive efficiency in chickens?
title_short Does lipidomic serum analysis support the assessment of digestive efficiency in chickens?
title_sort does lipidomic serum analysis support the assessment of digestive efficiency in chickens?
topic Metabolism and Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325459
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey483
work_keys_str_mv AT beauclercqstephane doeslipidomicserumanalysissupporttheassessmentofdigestiveefficiencyinchickens
AT lefevreantoine doeslipidomicserumanalysissupporttheassessmentofdigestiveefficiencyinchickens
AT nadaldesbaratslydie doeslipidomicserumanalysissupporttheassessmentofdigestiveefficiencyinchickens
AT germainkarine doeslipidomicserumanalysissupporttheassessmentofdigestiveefficiencyinchickens
AT praudchristophe doeslipidomicserumanalysissupporttheassessmentofdigestiveefficiencyinchickens
AT emondpatrick doeslipidomicserumanalysissupporttheassessmentofdigestiveefficiencyinchickens
AT bihanduvalelisabethle doeslipidomicserumanalysissupporttheassessmentofdigestiveefficiencyinchickens
AT mignongrasteausandrine doeslipidomicserumanalysissupporttheassessmentofdigestiveefficiencyinchickens