Cargando…

Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study

INTRODUCTION: One potential source of bias in randomised clinical trials of psychological interventions is researcher allegiance (RA). The operationalisation of RA differs strongly across studies, and there is not a generally accepted method of operationalising or measuring it. Furthermore, it remai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoder, Whitney Rose, Karyotaki, Eirini, Cristea, Ioana-Alina, van Duin, Daniëlle, Cuijpers, Pim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024622
_version_ 1783395749758763008
author Yoder, Whitney Rose
Karyotaki, Eirini
Cristea, Ioana-Alina
van Duin, Daniëlle
Cuijpers, Pim
author_facet Yoder, Whitney Rose
Karyotaki, Eirini
Cristea, Ioana-Alina
van Duin, Daniëlle
Cuijpers, Pim
author_sort Yoder, Whitney Rose
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: One potential source of bias in randomised clinical trials of psychological interventions is researcher allegiance (RA). The operationalisation of RA differs strongly across studies, and there is not a generally accepted method of operationalising or measuring it. Furthermore, it remains unclear as to how RA affects the outcomes of trials and if it results in better outcomes for a preferred intervention. The aim of this project is to develop and validate a scale that accurately identifies RA, contribute to the understanding of the impact that RA has in a research setting and to make recommendations for addressing RA in practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scale will first be developed and validated to measure RA in psychotherapy trials. The scale will be validated by surveying authors of psychotherapy trials to assess their opinions, beliefs and preferences of psychotherapy interventions. Furthermore, the scale will be validated for use outside the field of psychotherapy. The validated checklist will then be used to examine two potential mechanisms of how RA may affect outcomes of interventions: publication bias (by assessing grants) and risk of bias (RoB). Finally, recommendations will be developed, and a feasibility study will be conducted at a national mental health agency in The Netherlands. Main analyses comprise inter-rater reliability of checklist items, correlations to examine the relationship between checklist items and author survey (convergent validity) as well as checklist items and trial outcomes and multivariate meta-regression techniques to assess potential mechanisms of how allegiance affects trial outcomes (publication bias and RoB). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Scientific and Ethical Review Board (VCWE) at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Study result and advancements will also be published on the Open Science Framework. Furthermore, main findings will be disseminated through articles in international peer-reviewed open access journals. Results and recommendations will be communicated to the Cochrane Collaboration, the Campbell Collaboration and other funding agencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6377509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63775092019-03-05 Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study Yoder, Whitney Rose Karyotaki, Eirini Cristea, Ioana-Alina van Duin, Daniëlle Cuijpers, Pim BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: One potential source of bias in randomised clinical trials of psychological interventions is researcher allegiance (RA). The operationalisation of RA differs strongly across studies, and there is not a generally accepted method of operationalising or measuring it. Furthermore, it remains unclear as to how RA affects the outcomes of trials and if it results in better outcomes for a preferred intervention. The aim of this project is to develop and validate a scale that accurately identifies RA, contribute to the understanding of the impact that RA has in a research setting and to make recommendations for addressing RA in practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scale will first be developed and validated to measure RA in psychotherapy trials. The scale will be validated by surveying authors of psychotherapy trials to assess their opinions, beliefs and preferences of psychotherapy interventions. Furthermore, the scale will be validated for use outside the field of psychotherapy. The validated checklist will then be used to examine two potential mechanisms of how RA may affect outcomes of interventions: publication bias (by assessing grants) and risk of bias (RoB). Finally, recommendations will be developed, and a feasibility study will be conducted at a national mental health agency in The Netherlands. Main analyses comprise inter-rater reliability of checklist items, correlations to examine the relationship between checklist items and author survey (convergent validity) as well as checklist items and trial outcomes and multivariate meta-regression techniques to assess potential mechanisms of how allegiance affects trial outcomes (publication bias and RoB). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Scientific and Ethical Review Board (VCWE) at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Study result and advancements will also be published on the Open Science Framework. Furthermore, main findings will be disseminated through articles in international peer-reviewed open access journals. Results and recommendations will be communicated to the Cochrane Collaboration, the Campbell Collaboration and other funding agencies. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6377509/ /pubmed/30782912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024622 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Yoder, Whitney Rose
Karyotaki, Eirini
Cristea, Ioana-Alina
van Duin, Daniëlle
Cuijpers, Pim
Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study
title Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study
title_full Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study
title_fullStr Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study
title_short Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study
title_sort researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024622
work_keys_str_mv AT yoderwhitneyrose researcherallegianceinresearchonpsychosocialinterventionsmetaresearchstudyprotocolandpilotstudy
AT karyotakieirini researcherallegianceinresearchonpsychosocialinterventionsmetaresearchstudyprotocolandpilotstudy
AT cristeaioanaalina researcherallegianceinresearchonpsychosocialinterventionsmetaresearchstudyprotocolandpilotstudy
AT vanduindanielle researcherallegianceinresearchonpsychosocialinterventionsmetaresearchstudyprotocolandpilotstudy
AT cuijperspim researcherallegianceinresearchonpsychosocialinterventionsmetaresearchstudyprotocolandpilotstudy