Cargando…

Computed tomography volumetry of esophageal cancer - the role of semiautomatic assessment

BACKGROUND: The clinical and research value of Computed Tomography (CT) volumetry of esophageal cancer tumor size remains controversial. Development in CT technique and image analysis has made CT volumetry less cumbersome and it has gained renewed attention. The aim of this study was to assess esoph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yi-Hua, Fischer, Michael A., Lehmann, Henrik, Johnsson, Åse, Rouvelas, Ioannis, Herlin, Gunnar, Lundell, Lars, Brismar, Torkel B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30767773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0317-5
_version_ 1783395798714679296
author Zhang, Yi-Hua
Fischer, Michael A.
Lehmann, Henrik
Johnsson, Åse
Rouvelas, Ioannis
Herlin, Gunnar
Lundell, Lars
Brismar, Torkel B.
author_facet Zhang, Yi-Hua
Fischer, Michael A.
Lehmann, Henrik
Johnsson, Åse
Rouvelas, Ioannis
Herlin, Gunnar
Lundell, Lars
Brismar, Torkel B.
author_sort Zhang, Yi-Hua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical and research value of Computed Tomography (CT) volumetry of esophageal cancer tumor size remains controversial. Development in CT technique and image analysis has made CT volumetry less cumbersome and it has gained renewed attention. The aim of this study was to assess esophageal tumor volume by semi-automatic measurements as compared to manual. METHODS: A total of 23 esophageal cancer patients (median age 65, range 51–71), undergoing CT in the portal-venous phase for tumor staging, were retrospectively included between 2007 and 2012. One radiology resident and one consultant radiologist measured the tumor volume by semiautomatic segmentation and manual segmentation. Reproducibility of the respective measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and by average deviation from mean. RESULTS: Mean tumor volume was 46 ml (range 5-137 ml) using manual segmentation and 42 ml (range 3-111 ml) using semiautomatic segmentation. Semiautomatic measurement provided better inter-observer agreement than traditional manual segmentation. The ICC was significantly higher for semiautomatic segmentation in comparison to manual segmentation (0.86, 0.56, p < 0.01). The average absolute percentage difference from mean was reduced from 24 to 14% (p < 0.001) when using semiautomatic segmentation. CONCLUSIONS: Semiautomatic analysis outperforms manual analysis for assessment of esophageal tumor volume, improving reproducibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6377716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63777162019-02-27 Computed tomography volumetry of esophageal cancer - the role of semiautomatic assessment Zhang, Yi-Hua Fischer, Michael A. Lehmann, Henrik Johnsson, Åse Rouvelas, Ioannis Herlin, Gunnar Lundell, Lars Brismar, Torkel B. BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: The clinical and research value of Computed Tomography (CT) volumetry of esophageal cancer tumor size remains controversial. Development in CT technique and image analysis has made CT volumetry less cumbersome and it has gained renewed attention. The aim of this study was to assess esophageal tumor volume by semi-automatic measurements as compared to manual. METHODS: A total of 23 esophageal cancer patients (median age 65, range 51–71), undergoing CT in the portal-venous phase for tumor staging, were retrospectively included between 2007 and 2012. One radiology resident and one consultant radiologist measured the tumor volume by semiautomatic segmentation and manual segmentation. Reproducibility of the respective measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and by average deviation from mean. RESULTS: Mean tumor volume was 46 ml (range 5-137 ml) using manual segmentation and 42 ml (range 3-111 ml) using semiautomatic segmentation. Semiautomatic measurement provided better inter-observer agreement than traditional manual segmentation. The ICC was significantly higher for semiautomatic segmentation in comparison to manual segmentation (0.86, 0.56, p < 0.01). The average absolute percentage difference from mean was reduced from 24 to 14% (p < 0.001) when using semiautomatic segmentation. CONCLUSIONS: Semiautomatic analysis outperforms manual analysis for assessment of esophageal tumor volume, improving reproducibility. BioMed Central 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6377716/ /pubmed/30767773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0317-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Yi-Hua
Fischer, Michael A.
Lehmann, Henrik
Johnsson, Åse
Rouvelas, Ioannis
Herlin, Gunnar
Lundell, Lars
Brismar, Torkel B.
Computed tomography volumetry of esophageal cancer - the role of semiautomatic assessment
title Computed tomography volumetry of esophageal cancer - the role of semiautomatic assessment
title_full Computed tomography volumetry of esophageal cancer - the role of semiautomatic assessment
title_fullStr Computed tomography volumetry of esophageal cancer - the role of semiautomatic assessment
title_full_unstemmed Computed tomography volumetry of esophageal cancer - the role of semiautomatic assessment
title_short Computed tomography volumetry of esophageal cancer - the role of semiautomatic assessment
title_sort computed tomography volumetry of esophageal cancer - the role of semiautomatic assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30767773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0317-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyihua computedtomographyvolumetryofesophagealcancertheroleofsemiautomaticassessment
AT fischermichaela computedtomographyvolumetryofesophagealcancertheroleofsemiautomaticassessment
AT lehmannhenrik computedtomographyvolumetryofesophagealcancertheroleofsemiautomaticassessment
AT johnssonase computedtomographyvolumetryofesophagealcancertheroleofsemiautomaticassessment
AT rouvelasioannis computedtomographyvolumetryofesophagealcancertheroleofsemiautomaticassessment
AT herlingunnar computedtomographyvolumetryofesophagealcancertheroleofsemiautomaticassessment
AT lundelllars computedtomographyvolumetryofesophagealcancertheroleofsemiautomaticassessment
AT brismartorkelb computedtomographyvolumetryofesophagealcancertheroleofsemiautomaticassessment