Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren– a DEDIPAC case study

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to explore the implementation of school based diet and physical activity interventions with respect to the barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainability; supportive actions required for implementation and recommendations to overcome ide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayes, C. B., O’Shea, M. P., Foley-Nolan, C., McCarthy, M., Harrington, J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30767770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6368-7
_version_ 1783395809982676992
author Hayes, C. B.
O’Shea, M. P.
Foley-Nolan, C.
McCarthy, M.
Harrington, J. M.
author_facet Hayes, C. B.
O’Shea, M. P.
Foley-Nolan, C.
McCarthy, M.
Harrington, J. M.
author_sort Hayes, C. B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to explore the implementation of school based diet and physical activity interventions with respect to the barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainability; supportive actions required for implementation and recommendations to overcome identified barriers. Two interventions rolled out nationally in Ireland were chosen; Food Dudes, a programme to encourage primary school children to consume more fruit and vegetables and Green Schools Travel (GST), an active travel to school programme in primary and secondary schools. Trained school coordinators (teachers) cascade the programmes to other teaching staff. METHODS: Multiple case study design using qualitative semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders: primary and secondary school teachers, school coordinators, project coordinators/managers, funders and intermediaries. Fifteen interviews were conducted. Data were coded using a common categorization matrix. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance elements of the RE-AIM implementation framework. RESULTS: Good working relationships within and across government departments, intermediaries and schools were critical for intervention adoption, successful implementation and sustainability. Organisational and leadership ability of coordinators were essential. Provision of participation incentives acted as motivators to engage children’s interest. A deep understanding of the lives of the target children was an important contextual factor. The importance of adaptation without compromising core components in enhancing intervention sustainability emerged. Successful implementation was hindered by: funding insecurity, school timetable constraints, broad rather than specific intervention core components, and lack of agreement on conduct of programme evaluation. Supportive actions for maintenance included ongoing political support, secure funding and pre-existing healthy lifestyle policies. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation and scale up of public health anti-obesity interventions in schools is dependent on good contextual fit, engagement and leadership at multiple levels and secure funding. Recommendations to overcome barriers include: capacity to deliver within an already overcrowded curriculum and clear specification of intervention components within a conceptual framework to facilitate evaluation. Our findings are generalisable across different contexts and are highly relevant to those involved in the development or adaptation, organisation or execution of national public health interventions: policy makers, guidelines developers, and staff involved in local organisation and delivery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6368-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6377757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63777572019-02-27 Barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren– a DEDIPAC case study Hayes, C. B. O’Shea, M. P. Foley-Nolan, C. McCarthy, M. Harrington, J. M. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to explore the implementation of school based diet and physical activity interventions with respect to the barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainability; supportive actions required for implementation and recommendations to overcome identified barriers. Two interventions rolled out nationally in Ireland were chosen; Food Dudes, a programme to encourage primary school children to consume more fruit and vegetables and Green Schools Travel (GST), an active travel to school programme in primary and secondary schools. Trained school coordinators (teachers) cascade the programmes to other teaching staff. METHODS: Multiple case study design using qualitative semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders: primary and secondary school teachers, school coordinators, project coordinators/managers, funders and intermediaries. Fifteen interviews were conducted. Data were coded using a common categorization matrix. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance elements of the RE-AIM implementation framework. RESULTS: Good working relationships within and across government departments, intermediaries and schools were critical for intervention adoption, successful implementation and sustainability. Organisational and leadership ability of coordinators were essential. Provision of participation incentives acted as motivators to engage children’s interest. A deep understanding of the lives of the target children was an important contextual factor. The importance of adaptation without compromising core components in enhancing intervention sustainability emerged. Successful implementation was hindered by: funding insecurity, school timetable constraints, broad rather than specific intervention core components, and lack of agreement on conduct of programme evaluation. Supportive actions for maintenance included ongoing political support, secure funding and pre-existing healthy lifestyle policies. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation and scale up of public health anti-obesity interventions in schools is dependent on good contextual fit, engagement and leadership at multiple levels and secure funding. Recommendations to overcome barriers include: capacity to deliver within an already overcrowded curriculum and clear specification of intervention components within a conceptual framework to facilitate evaluation. Our findings are generalisable across different contexts and are highly relevant to those involved in the development or adaptation, organisation or execution of national public health interventions: policy makers, guidelines developers, and staff involved in local organisation and delivery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6368-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6377757/ /pubmed/30767770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6368-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hayes, C. B.
O’Shea, M. P.
Foley-Nolan, C.
McCarthy, M.
Harrington, J. M.
Barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren– a DEDIPAC case study
title Barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren– a DEDIPAC case study
title_full Barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren– a DEDIPAC case study
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren– a DEDIPAC case study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren– a DEDIPAC case study
title_short Barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren– a DEDIPAC case study
title_sort barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren– a dedipac case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30767770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6368-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hayescb barriersandfacilitatorstoadoptionimplementationandsustainmentofobesitypreventioninterventionsinschoolchildrenadedipaccasestudy
AT osheamp barriersandfacilitatorstoadoptionimplementationandsustainmentofobesitypreventioninterventionsinschoolchildrenadedipaccasestudy
AT foleynolanc barriersandfacilitatorstoadoptionimplementationandsustainmentofobesitypreventioninterventionsinschoolchildrenadedipaccasestudy
AT mccarthym barriersandfacilitatorstoadoptionimplementationandsustainmentofobesitypreventioninterventionsinschoolchildrenadedipaccasestudy
AT harringtonjm barriersandfacilitatorstoadoptionimplementationandsustainmentofobesitypreventioninterventionsinschoolchildrenadedipaccasestudy