Cargando…

A WAIST-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF 0.54 IS A GOOD PREDICTOR OF METABOLIC SYNDROME IN 16-YEAR-OLD MALE AND FEMALE ADOLESCENTS

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of selected anthropometric indicators as predictors of cardiovascular risk in adolescents. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 678 adolescents (16.8y ± 0.3) from an infancy cohort. Weight, height, waist circumference (WC) and hip circum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasquez, Fabian, Correa-Burrows, Paulina, Blanco, Estela, Gahagan, Sheila, Burrows, Raquel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0257-8
_version_ 1783395820278644736
author Vasquez, Fabian
Correa-Burrows, Paulina
Blanco, Estela
Gahagan, Sheila
Burrows, Raquel
author_facet Vasquez, Fabian
Correa-Burrows, Paulina
Blanco, Estela
Gahagan, Sheila
Burrows, Raquel
author_sort Vasquez, Fabian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of selected anthropometric indicators as predictors of cardiovascular risk in adolescents. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 678 adolescents (16.8y ± 0.3) from an infancy cohort. Weight, height, waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference were measured. Body-Mass Index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were estimated. MetS was diagnosed with IDF/AHA/NHLBI. Optimal cutoffs of BMI, WC, WHR and WHtR for diagnosing MetS were determined using ROC analysis. RESULTS: In males, WHtR (0.96) had the greatest area under the ROC curve, followed by WC (0.95) and BMI (0.93). In females, BMI (0.84) had the greatest area under the ROC curve (0.84), followed by WHtR (0.83) and WC (0.83). In both sexes, the optimal WHtR cutoff for MetS diagnosis was 0.54. A BMI of 26.9 in males and 26.3 in females were the optimal cutoffs for diagnosing MetS. Finally, WC values of 92 and 81.6 cm in males and females, respectively, were the optimal cutoffs for MetS diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In both sexes, a WHtR value of 0.54 was a good predictor of MetS. In males and females, the optimal cutoff of BMI for Mets diagnosis was below the values for diagnosing obesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6377811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63778112019-06-17 A WAIST-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF 0.54 IS A GOOD PREDICTOR OF METABOLIC SYNDROME IN 16-YEAR-OLD MALE AND FEMALE ADOLESCENTS Vasquez, Fabian Correa-Burrows, Paulina Blanco, Estela Gahagan, Sheila Burrows, Raquel Pediatr Res Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of selected anthropometric indicators as predictors of cardiovascular risk in adolescents. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 678 adolescents (16.8y ± 0.3) from an infancy cohort. Weight, height, waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference were measured. Body-Mass Index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were estimated. MetS was diagnosed with IDF/AHA/NHLBI. Optimal cutoffs of BMI, WC, WHR and WHtR for diagnosing MetS were determined using ROC analysis. RESULTS: In males, WHtR (0.96) had the greatest area under the ROC curve, followed by WC (0.95) and BMI (0.93). In females, BMI (0.84) had the greatest area under the ROC curve (0.84), followed by WHtR (0.83) and WC (0.83). In both sexes, the optimal WHtR cutoff for MetS diagnosis was 0.54. A BMI of 26.9 in males and 26.3 in females were the optimal cutoffs for diagnosing MetS. Finally, WC values of 92 and 81.6 cm in males and females, respectively, were the optimal cutoffs for MetS diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In both sexes, a WHtR value of 0.54 was a good predictor of MetS. In males and females, the optimal cutoff of BMI for Mets diagnosis was below the values for diagnosing obesity. 2018-12-17 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6377811/ /pubmed/30631139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0257-8 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Vasquez, Fabian
Correa-Burrows, Paulina
Blanco, Estela
Gahagan, Sheila
Burrows, Raquel
A WAIST-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF 0.54 IS A GOOD PREDICTOR OF METABOLIC SYNDROME IN 16-YEAR-OLD MALE AND FEMALE ADOLESCENTS
title A WAIST-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF 0.54 IS A GOOD PREDICTOR OF METABOLIC SYNDROME IN 16-YEAR-OLD MALE AND FEMALE ADOLESCENTS
title_full A WAIST-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF 0.54 IS A GOOD PREDICTOR OF METABOLIC SYNDROME IN 16-YEAR-OLD MALE AND FEMALE ADOLESCENTS
title_fullStr A WAIST-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF 0.54 IS A GOOD PREDICTOR OF METABOLIC SYNDROME IN 16-YEAR-OLD MALE AND FEMALE ADOLESCENTS
title_full_unstemmed A WAIST-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF 0.54 IS A GOOD PREDICTOR OF METABOLIC SYNDROME IN 16-YEAR-OLD MALE AND FEMALE ADOLESCENTS
title_short A WAIST-TO-HEIGHT RATIO OF 0.54 IS A GOOD PREDICTOR OF METABOLIC SYNDROME IN 16-YEAR-OLD MALE AND FEMALE ADOLESCENTS
title_sort waist-to-height ratio of 0.54 is a good predictor of metabolic syndrome in 16-year-old male and female adolescents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0257-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vasquezfabian awaisttoheightratioof054isagoodpredictorofmetabolicsyndromein16yearoldmaleandfemaleadolescents
AT correaburrowspaulina awaisttoheightratioof054isagoodpredictorofmetabolicsyndromein16yearoldmaleandfemaleadolescents
AT blancoestela awaisttoheightratioof054isagoodpredictorofmetabolicsyndromein16yearoldmaleandfemaleadolescents
AT gahagansheila awaisttoheightratioof054isagoodpredictorofmetabolicsyndromein16yearoldmaleandfemaleadolescents
AT burrowsraquel awaisttoheightratioof054isagoodpredictorofmetabolicsyndromein16yearoldmaleandfemaleadolescents
AT vasquezfabian waisttoheightratioof054isagoodpredictorofmetabolicsyndromein16yearoldmaleandfemaleadolescents
AT correaburrowspaulina waisttoheightratioof054isagoodpredictorofmetabolicsyndromein16yearoldmaleandfemaleadolescents
AT blancoestela waisttoheightratioof054isagoodpredictorofmetabolicsyndromein16yearoldmaleandfemaleadolescents
AT gahagansheila waisttoheightratioof054isagoodpredictorofmetabolicsyndromein16yearoldmaleandfemaleadolescents
AT burrowsraquel waisttoheightratioof054isagoodpredictorofmetabolicsyndromein16yearoldmaleandfemaleadolescents