Cargando…

Differentiating False Loss of Resistance from True Loss of Resistance While Performing the Epidural Block with the CompuFlo® Epidural Instrument

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of false losses of resistance may be one of the reasons for inadequate or failed epidural block. A CompuFlo® epidural instrument has been introduced to measure the pressure of human tissues in real time at the orifice of a needle and has been used as a tool to identify the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaira, Pasquale, Camorcia, Michela, Palladino, Tiziana, Velardo, Matteo, Capogna, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5185901
_version_ 1783395861440495616
author Vaira, Pasquale
Camorcia, Michela
Palladino, Tiziana
Velardo, Matteo
Capogna, Giorgio
author_facet Vaira, Pasquale
Camorcia, Michela
Palladino, Tiziana
Velardo, Matteo
Capogna, Giorgio
author_sort Vaira, Pasquale
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The occurrence of false losses of resistance may be one of the reasons for inadequate or failed epidural block. A CompuFlo® epidural instrument has been introduced to measure the pressure of human tissues in real time at the orifice of a needle and has been used as a tool to identify the epidural space. The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity and the specificity of the ability of CompuFlo® to differentiate the false loss of resistance from the true loss of resistance encountered during the epidural space identification procedure. METHOD: We performed epidural block with the CompuFlo® epidural instrument in 120 healthy women who requested labor epidural analgesia. The epidural needle was considered to have reached the epidural space when an increase in pressure (accompanied by an increase in the pitch of the audible tone) was followed by a sudden and sustained drop in pressure for more than 5 seconds accompanied by a sudden decrease in the pitch of the audible tone, resulting in the formation of a low and stable pressure plateau. We evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the ability of CompuFlo® recordings to correctly identify the true LOR from the false LOR. RESULTS: The drop in pressure associated with the epidural space identification was significantly greater than that recorded after the false loss of resistance (73% vs 33%) (P=0.000001). The sensitivity was 0.83, and the AUC was 0.82. DISCUSSION: We have confirmed the ability of CompuFlo® to differentiate the false loss of resistance from the true loss of resistance and established its specificity and sensitivity. CONCLUSION: An easier identification of dubious losses of resistance during the epidural procedure is essential to reduce the number of epidural attempts and/or needle reinsertions with the potential of a reduced risk of accidental dural puncture especially in difficult cases or when the procedure is performed by trainees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6378074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63780742019-03-12 Differentiating False Loss of Resistance from True Loss of Resistance While Performing the Epidural Block with the CompuFlo® Epidural Instrument Vaira, Pasquale Camorcia, Michela Palladino, Tiziana Velardo, Matteo Capogna, Giorgio Anesthesiol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The occurrence of false losses of resistance may be one of the reasons for inadequate or failed epidural block. A CompuFlo® epidural instrument has been introduced to measure the pressure of human tissues in real time at the orifice of a needle and has been used as a tool to identify the epidural space. The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity and the specificity of the ability of CompuFlo® to differentiate the false loss of resistance from the true loss of resistance encountered during the epidural space identification procedure. METHOD: We performed epidural block with the CompuFlo® epidural instrument in 120 healthy women who requested labor epidural analgesia. The epidural needle was considered to have reached the epidural space when an increase in pressure (accompanied by an increase in the pitch of the audible tone) was followed by a sudden and sustained drop in pressure for more than 5 seconds accompanied by a sudden decrease in the pitch of the audible tone, resulting in the formation of a low and stable pressure plateau. We evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the ability of CompuFlo® recordings to correctly identify the true LOR from the false LOR. RESULTS: The drop in pressure associated with the epidural space identification was significantly greater than that recorded after the false loss of resistance (73% vs 33%) (P=0.000001). The sensitivity was 0.83, and the AUC was 0.82. DISCUSSION: We have confirmed the ability of CompuFlo® to differentiate the false loss of resistance from the true loss of resistance and established its specificity and sensitivity. CONCLUSION: An easier identification of dubious losses of resistance during the epidural procedure is essential to reduce the number of epidural attempts and/or needle reinsertions with the potential of a reduced risk of accidental dural puncture especially in difficult cases or when the procedure is performed by trainees. Hindawi 2019-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6378074/ /pubmed/30863447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5185901 Text en Copyright © 2019 Pasquale Vaira et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vaira, Pasquale
Camorcia, Michela
Palladino, Tiziana
Velardo, Matteo
Capogna, Giorgio
Differentiating False Loss of Resistance from True Loss of Resistance While Performing the Epidural Block with the CompuFlo® Epidural Instrument
title Differentiating False Loss of Resistance from True Loss of Resistance While Performing the Epidural Block with the CompuFlo® Epidural Instrument
title_full Differentiating False Loss of Resistance from True Loss of Resistance While Performing the Epidural Block with the CompuFlo® Epidural Instrument
title_fullStr Differentiating False Loss of Resistance from True Loss of Resistance While Performing the Epidural Block with the CompuFlo® Epidural Instrument
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating False Loss of Resistance from True Loss of Resistance While Performing the Epidural Block with the CompuFlo® Epidural Instrument
title_short Differentiating False Loss of Resistance from True Loss of Resistance While Performing the Epidural Block with the CompuFlo® Epidural Instrument
title_sort differentiating false loss of resistance from true loss of resistance while performing the epidural block with the compuflo® epidural instrument
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5185901
work_keys_str_mv AT vairapasquale differentiatingfalselossofresistancefromtruelossofresistancewhileperformingtheepiduralblockwiththecompufloepiduralinstrument
AT camorciamichela differentiatingfalselossofresistancefromtruelossofresistancewhileperformingtheepiduralblockwiththecompufloepiduralinstrument
AT palladinotiziana differentiatingfalselossofresistancefromtruelossofresistancewhileperformingtheepiduralblockwiththecompufloepiduralinstrument
AT velardomatteo differentiatingfalselossofresistancefromtruelossofresistancewhileperformingtheepiduralblockwiththecompufloepiduralinstrument
AT capognagiorgio differentiatingfalselossofresistancefromtruelossofresistancewhileperformingtheepiduralblockwiththecompufloepiduralinstrument